Case law

Ruben F. Lima v. National Labor Relations Board, Keco Industries, Inc., Intervenor

819 F.2d 300 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 19, 1987

The ALJ concluded that Lima’s conduct did not constitute “serious misconduct” disqualifying him from reinstatement under the standards set forth in NLRB v. … See, e.g., Darr v. NLRB, 801 F.2d 1404, 1408-09 (D.C.Cir.1986) (remanding where Board did not clearly explain the basis for its decision); cf. Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers Int’l Union v.

Burwell v. United States

901 A.2d 763 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 22, 2006

See Brown v. United States, 546 A.2d 390, 397-98 (D.C.1988). 783 A.2d at 129 . … Counsel was appointed for Brown, and Brown invoked his privilege against self-incrimination. The prosecutor then “debriefed” Brown in conformity with Carter v.

D'Amico Ex Rel. National Labor Relations Board v. United States Service Industries, Inc.

867 F. Supp. 1075 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 3, 1994

The Board petitioned for injunctive relief just eleven weeks after the final complaint was issued. See Pascarelli v. Vibra Screw Inc., 904 F.2d 874, 881 (3d Cir.1990); Blyer v. … Brown v. Artery Org., Inc., 654 F.Supp. 1106, 1119 (D.D.C.1987). The public interest will most readily be served by a return to the status quo in order to permit violations of the NLRA to be effectively remedied. B.

Recording Industry Ass'n of America, Inc. v. Librarian of Congress

608 F.3d 861 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 22, 2010

See FCC v. Fox Television Stations, 129 S. Ct. 1800, 1810 (2009); Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Ass’n v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 463 U.S. 29, 43 (1983). … Sys., Inc. v. Copyright Royalty Bd., 574 F.3d 748, 760-61 (D.C.

Drivers, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union No. 639 v. National Labor Relations Board

274 F.2d 551 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 26, 1958

B. v. International Rice Milling Co., 1951, 341 U.S. 665 , 71 S.Ct. 961 , 95 L.Ed. 1277 , for a discussion of § 13. The use of “strike” in § 13 has been construed to apply to picketing as well. … L. v. N. L. R.

Local 1351, Steamship Clerks & Checkers, International Longshoremen's Ass'n v. National Labor Relations Board

329 F.2d 259 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 13, 1964

Local 60, United Broth. of Carpenters and Joiners of America, AFL-CIO v. N. L. R. B., 365 U.S. 651, 655 , 81 S.Ct. 875, 877 , 6 L.Ed.2d 1 (1961), citing Consolidated Edison Co. of New York v. N. L. R. … B. v. General Motors, 373 U.S. 734 , 83 S.Ct. 1453 , 10 L.Ed.2d 670 (1963). However, whether or not this should be done in the present situation is a matter for the Board itself to decide initially. .

Association of American Railroads v. United States Department of Transportation

721 F.3d 666 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 2, 2013

We nevertheless believe Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Co. Accounting Oversight Board, 130 S. Ct. 3138 (2010), offers guidance. … Gaming Opposition v. Kempthorne, 525 F.3d 23, 34 (D.C. Cir. 2008) (Brown, J., dissenting in part).

Belcon Inc. v. District of Columbia Water & Sewer Authority

826 A.2d 380 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 12, 2003

Ross v. Fierro, 659 A.2d 234 , 239 n. 5 (D.C.1995) (quoting Brown v. United States, 590 A.2d 1008 , 1021 n. 19 (D.C.1991)). … Co. v.

City of Philadelphia v. Civil Aeronautics Board, the Flying Tiger Line, Inc., Intervenor

289 F.2d 770 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 23, 1961

The Flying Tiger Line, Inc., operates a transcontinental air freight service under the authority of a certificate issued by the Civil Aeronautics Board in 1949, 10 C.A.B. 572, 635, and renewed from time to time with alterations … We conclude that the new service pattern permitted by the Board’s order is consistent with, and within the meaning of, Tiger’s certificate of convenience and necessity.

Guy v. United States

107 F.2d 288 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 9, 1939

It was like a board * * * hit pn a person.” She saw Guy in the window. Lucy Simpson lived at 224 Canal Street. She had known Guy for three or four years, and Edna for one year. … Brown whether Edna told him, in her daughter’s presence, on May 27, that she fell downstairs. He answered yes.

Frederick C. Zangardi v. Walter N. Tobriner, President, Board of D. C. Commissioners

348 F.2d 370 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 22, 1965

On appeal from the District Court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of appel-lees, Board of Commissioners, he urges that he should have been retired at the higher annuity specified by Section 4-527 (D.C.Code, 1961) since

Plumbers and Pipe Fitters Local Union No. 32 v. National Labor Relations Board

50 F.3d 29 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 7, 1995

As early as 1967, in Truck Drivers, Local Union 568 v. … See, e.g., International Union of Elec., Elec., Salaried, Mach. and Furniture Workers v. NLRB, 41 F.3d 1532, 1537 (D.C.Cir.1994); see also NLRB v. Gen.

Stephens v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.

755 F.3d 959 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 24, 2014

Airways Retirement Board, which rejected Stephens’s claim in 1999. Neither Mahoney nor any other U.S. Airways pilot filed a similar claim with the airline or Retirement Board. … Id. at 440 (Brown, J., for the court).

Fraternal Order of Police v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

391 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 27, 2005

See, e.g., Bishop v. Wood, 426 U.S. 341, 343 , 96 S.Ct. 2074 , 48 L.Ed.2d 684 (1976), overruled in part on other grounds by Cleveland Board of Educ. v. … .”); Babbitt v.

Bayer v. Rice

75 F.2d 238 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 24, 1934

Pyzel v. Black, 58 App. D. C. 16, 24 F.(2d) 281 ; Rolfe v. Kaisling, 32 App. D. C. 582; Gaisman v. Gillette, 36 App. D. C. 440; Hubbard v. Berg, 40 App. D. C. 577; Aufiero v. Monnot, 46 App. D. C. 297; Kotaro Honda v. … Prindle v. Brown, 24 App. D. C. 114; Marx v. Brown, 57 App. D. C. 177, 18 F.(2d) 827, 828 .

Reilly v. Secretary of the Navy

12 F. Supp. 3d 125 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 29, 2014

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). Under Rule 12(b)(1), the plaintiff bears the burden of establishing jurisdiction by a preponderance of the evidence. See Lujan v. … DATE: January 29, 2014 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

Cox v. McCulloch

315 F.2d 48 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 24, 1963

See Leedom v. … Union v. Brown, 9 Cir., 284 F.2d 619 (1960), cert. denied, 366 U.S. 934 , 81 S.Ct. 1659 , 6 L.Ed.2d 846 (1961); Atlas Life Insurance Company v. Leedom, 109 U.S.App.D.C. 97 , 284 F.2d 231 (1960); Leedom v.

Fashion Valley Mall, LLC. v. National Labor Relations Board

524 F.3d 1378 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 9, 2008

Ryan v. Bentsen, 12 F.3d 245, 247 (D.C.Cir.1993). The Board has never said it lacks jurisdiction to decide whether a state law is constitutional, cf. … See Arizonans for Official English v.

M.M. & G., Inc. v. Jackson

612 A.2d 186 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 2, 1992

See Bennerson v. … Co. v.

Fashion Valley Mall, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board

451 F.3d 241 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 9, 2008

Ryan v. Bentsen, 12 F.3d 245, 247 (D.C. Cir. 1993). The Board has never said it lacks jurisdiction to decide whether a state law is constitutional, cf. … See Arizonans for Official English v.