Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersOK

10,000+ results

4.28s

  • HAWORTH BD. OF EDUCATION, ETC. v. Havens

    637 P.2d 902 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 30, 1981

    Graybill v. Oklahoma State Board of Education, Okl., 585 P.2d 1358 (1978). … One purpose of Open Meeting Acts is discussed at 49 O.B.A.J. 1515 (1978), quoting from Board of Public Instruction v. Doran, Fla., 224 So.2d 693 (1969).

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Missouri Gas Energy v. Grant County Assessor

    376 P.3d 923 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · May 13, 2016

    Fanning v. Brown, 2004 OK 7, 8 , 85 P.3d 841, 845 . … Golsen v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Smith v. State

    12 Okla. Crim. 307 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 15, 1916

    Bessie Brown with a lady friend was walking down South Second street to the Midland Valley station, where Mrs. Brown intended to take the 5 :25 P. M. train. … Alberty v. The State, 10th Okla. Cr. 616, 140 Pac. 1025 , 52 E. R. A. (N. S.) 248; Adair v. State, 6th Okla. Cr. 284, 118 Pac. 416 , 44 L. R. A. (N. S.) 119.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Little v. Employer's Casualty Co.

    185 Okla. 481 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 3, 1939

    Swift & Co. v. Walden, 176 Okla. 268 , 55 P.2d 71 . As said in the ease of Osborn v. … To the same effect see Rose v. Singer Bros. Cloak Co., 171 Okla. 245 , 42 P.2d 548 ; Claypool v. Employer’s Casualty Co., 177 Okla. 286 , 58 P.2d 876 ; Mires v. Hogan, 79 Okla. 233 , 192 P. 811 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Jones v. Major

    317 P.2d 190 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 17, 1957

    As further support for such argument defendant relies upon the holding in Thomas & Sons v. Axtell, 97 Okl. 228 , 223 P. 152 . Examination of this case reflects the inapplicability of that decision to this appeal. … The argument is that the language of the Act is clear and unequivocal and was so recognized in National Security Corp. v. Kneeland, Okl., 294 P.2d 310 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Maddox v. State

    54 Okla. Crim. 120 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 14, 1932

    In Jackson v. State, 49 Okla. … .” *122 In the case at bar, the Browns were lawfully in possession of the premises.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Tice v. Pennington

    30 P.3d 1164 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · May 30, 2001

    Brown v. Oklahoma State Bank & Trust Co. of Vinita, 1993 OK 117 , 860 P.2d 230 ; Flowers v. Stanley, 1957 OK 237 , 316 P.2d 840 . … Cruse v. Atoka County Board of Commissioners, 1995 OK 143, ¶ 16 , 910 P.2d 998, 1004 . All inferences and conclusions to be drawn from the materials must be viewed in a llght most favorable to the non-moving party.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • HAMILTON v. STATE

    387 P.3d 903 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 1, 2016

    Appellant’s reliance on Brown v. State, 2008 OK CR 3 , 177 P.3d 577 , is misplaced. Brown was charged with 100 counts of simple possession of child pornography based on images found on several storage devices. … Brown, 2008 OK CR 3, ¶ 5 , 177 P.3d at 579 . As the parties and the district court observed below, the Legislature appears to have enacted the Aggravated Possession statute in direct response to Brown .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • R.R. Tway, Inc. v. Oklahoma Tax Commission

    910 P.2d 972 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 21, 1995

    Board of Tax Roll Corrections of Tulsa County v. Mack Truck Sales, 620 P.2d 388 (1980). … See Board of County Commissioners of Creek County v. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry.

    Cited 37 timesPublished
  • Hoyle v. Glenn E. Breeding Co.

    555 P.2d 1278 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 12, 1976

    Similarly in Spellman v. … In Poley v. Browne, 199 Okl. 416 , 186 P.2d 812 (1947), this Court considered a situation analogous to the case now before us.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Haltom v. Nichols & Shepard Co.

    64 Okla. 184 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 10, 1917

    Haltom sued one Brown, and caused an attachment to be levied upon a certain threshing machine outfit as the property of said Brown. … Clark, 38 Okla. 243 , 132 Pac. 904 ; Brown v. Ohowning, 59 Okla, 278, 159 Pac. 323 .

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • TERRAL TELEPHONE CO. v. OKLAHOMA STATE BD. OF EQUALIZATION

    2023 OK 51 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 2, 2023

    Dowd, ELIAS, BOOKS, BROWN & NELSON, P.C., Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, for Appellant/Complainant Christy D. … Estes v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. State

    175 Okla. 11 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 26, 1935

    In re Assessment of Omitted Property of Prairie Oil & Gas Co., 159 Okla. 181 , 13 P. (2d) 580 ; Board of Equalization of Carter Co. et al. v. … Brown et al., 79 Okla. 170 , 192 P. 417 ; Bruner et al. v. Bearden, 80 Okla. 154 , 195 P. 117 ); and parol evidence may be used to explain an uncertainty (Adams et al. v. State ex rel.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Atlantic Richfield Co. v. State Ex Rel. Wildlife Conservation Commission

    659 P.2d 930 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 8, 1983

    In Shell Oil Co. v. … See, Hargis v. Hargis, 181 Okl. 377 , 73 P.2d 1129 (1937); Benson v. Fore, 136 Okl. 185 , 276 P. 742 , 64 A.L.R. 154 (1929). . See e.g., Hargis v. Hargis, supra, Note 1; Brown v.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Davis v. McCarty

    388 P.2d 480 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 10, 1964

    In Jones v. … See Brown v. State Election Board, Okl., 369 P.2d 140 , and cases referred to therein. A co-ordinate branch of the government may never be permitted to destroy itself.

    Overruled in part by Alexander v. Taylor, 51 P.3d 1204 (2002)Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Atchley v. Hewes

    69 O.B.A.J. 3527 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 31, 1998

    Tate v. Browning-Ferris, Inc., 1992 OK 72 , 833 P.2d 1218 . However, where it defies fundamental logic to do otherwise, the Oklahoma Supreme Court has construed “may” to mean “must.” … Board of Education of City of Tulsa v. Morley, 168 Okl. 259 , 34 P.2d 258 (1934). 2 .

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Wilson v. Oklahoma Horse Racing Commission

    67 O.B.A.J. 203 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 16, 1996

    See also, Lowrey v. … Miller v. Mission, 705 F.2d 368 , 372 (10th Cir.1983). In Staton v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Bartlett v. STERLING CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

    499 P.2d 425 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 25, 1972

    BROWN J. E. Peterschmidt, President L. H. Brown, Vice Pres. Approved: /s/ A. G. BARTLETT A. G. … In Sherbondy et al. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brewer v. State

    44 Okla. Crim. 361 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 18, 1929

    Brewer, engaged in a difficulty with one Hosea Brown, in the *363 course of which Brown was cut several times with a knife. The difficulty, in a measure, was brought on by Brown. … Boutcher v. State, 4 Okla. Cr. 576 , 111 Pac. 1006 ; Mathews v. State, 19 Okla. Cr. 153 , 198 Pac. 112 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • HAMILTON v. STATE

    466 P.3d 587 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 4, 2020

    See Browning v. State , 2006 OK CR 8, ¶ 36, 134 P.3d 816, 839; Alverson v. State , 1999 OK CR 21, ¶¶ 38-40, 983 P.2d 498, 513. … Citationizer: Table of Authority Cite Name Level Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals Cases Cite Name Level 2006 OK CR 8, 134 P.3d 816, BROWNING v. STATE Discussed 2007 OK CR 12, 157 P.3d 143, GLOSSIP v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.