Case law

Campbell v. Town of MacHias

661 A.2d 1133 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 19, 1995

In the seminal case, NLRB v. … until completion of the Board’s hearing. 437 U.S. at 236 , 98 S.Ct. at 2324 ...Similarly, in Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v.

Van Horn v. Town of Castine

167 F. Supp. 2d 103 · District Court, D. Maine · Oct 18, 2001

Van Horn appealed the decision to the Board of Appeals, but the Board found that it lacked jurisdiction. On July 13, 2001, Mr. … Starlight Sugar, Inc. v. Soto, 253 F.3d 137, 145 (1st Cir.2001); see also City of Cleburne v.

State v. Uffelman

626 A.2d 340 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 2, 1993

State v. Reynoso, 604 A.2d 441, 442 (Me.1992) (citing State v. Mitchell, 593 A.2d 1047, 1050 (Me.1991)). … State v. Estes, 418 A.2d at 1116 .

Simpson v. Simpson

119 Me. 14 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 11, 1920

State v. Hill, 48 Maine, 24; Brown v. Moore, 79 Maine, 216. But our Law Court is not a court of common law jurisdiction, and therefore has no inherent power to grant new trials. … Referring to Holmes v. Holmes and Lord v.

United States v. McCray

230 F. Supp. 2d 89 · District Court, D. Maine · Sep 26, 2002

See, e.g., United States v. … See, e.g., United States v.

Castle v. Belfast Foundry Co.

72 Me. 167 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 11, 1881

In Whitney v. … The principle decided in this case is to be found in Abbott v. Shawmut Ins. Co. 3 Allen, 215 , and in Atkins v. Brown, 59 Maine, 90.

Town of Pownal v. Emerson

639 A.2d 619 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 25, 1994

Waterville Hotel Corp. v. Board of Zoning Appeals, 241 A.2d 50, 53 (Me.1968). … See Chandler v.

Wilson v. Condon

153 A.3d 98 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 29, 2016

See Reardon v. Larkin, 2010 ME 86, ¶¶ 16-17 , 3 A.3d 376 ; Pelletier v. Fort Kent Golf Club, 662 A.2d 220, 224-25 (Me. 1995); Westlake v. Morton, 655 A.2d 334, 336 (Me. 1995); Stubbs v. … Brown, 288 A.2d 713, 715 (Me. 1972) (“The degree of credibility to which witnesses are entitled is for the jury and not the court to decide.”). [¶ 9] Wilson also contends, based on Questions 3 and 4 of the verdict form, 1

Express Scripts Inc. et al.

304 A.3d 239 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 7, 2023

Franchise Tax Board, 463 U.S. 159, 169-70 (1983). … Dyer v.

Moriarty Water Works, Inc. v. Portland Water Dist.

Superior Court of Maine · Nov 3, 2003

Lyons v. Board of Directors of School Administrative District NO. 43, 503 A.2d 233, 235 (Me. 1986) (citations omitted). … Rogers v. Brown, 135 Me. 117, 119, 190 A. 632, 633 (1937). “The writ is one requiring the doing of some specific duty, imposed by law, which the applicant, otherwise without remedy, is entitled to have performed.

State v. Barrows

76 Me. 401 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 26, 1884

The Queen v. Thompson, L. R. 1 C. C. 378; The Queen v. Winsor, L. R. 1 Q. B. 390; The Queen v. Payne, L. R. 1 C. C. 349; The Queen v. Deeley, 11 Cox. C. C. 607. … Com. v. Brown, 130 Mass. 279 . If the argument for the defendant is sound, then the common law rule has become reversed.

Dudley v. Wyler

647 A.2d 90 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 25, 1994

See Niner v. … See Kleinschmidt v. Morrow, 642 A.2d 161, 165-66 (Me.1994); Bartner v.

Consumers for Affordable Health Care, Inc. v. Superintendent of Insurance

809 A.2d 1233 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 16, 2002

Green v. … V.

Low v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.

72 Me. 313 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 6, 1881

Smith v. London & St. Catherine’s Docks Co. 3 L. R. C. P. 326. In Stratton v. … Wendell v. Baxter, 12 Gray, 494 , citing: Collett v. London & N. W.

Estate of O'Connor

615 A.2d 1179 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 12, 1992

Browne v. Dubey, 251 A.2d 424, 425 (Me.1969) (citing Morrill v. Morrill, 116 Me. 154, 155 , 100 A. 756 (1917)). … Hamm v. Hamm, 584 A.2d 59, 62 (Me.1990).

Smith v. Treat

22 F. Cas. 687 · District Court, D. Maine · Nov 4, 1845

At this moment, the captain came on board and put an end to the affray. The blows given to Hadley proved mortal, and he died the following night. … Thorne v. White [Case No. 13,989); Black v. The Louisiana [Id. 1,461]; Drysdale v. The Ranger [Id. 4,097]; Sprague v. Kain [Id. 13,250]; Orne v. Townsend [Id. 10,583]; The Lady Campbell, 2 Hagg.

Knight v. Portland, Saco & Portsmouth Railroad

56 Me. 234 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1868

The defendants introduced evidence tending to show that, at the entrance to the steamboat wharf was a guide-board, or sign, indicating the way to the steamboat. … Railroad Co. v.

Pejepscot Industrial Park, Inc. v. Maine Central Railroad

297 F. Supp. 2d 326 · District Court, D. Maine · Dec 22, 2003

Bailey Co. v. … Counts V and VI The ICCTA reserves jurisdiction over transportation by rail carrier to the STB as follows: (b) The jurisdiction of the Board over- (1) transportation by rail carriers, and the remedies provided in this part

Inhabitants of Fort Fairfield v. Inhabitants of Millinocket

136 Me. 426 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 1, 1940

Carter v. Augusta, 84 Me., 418, 24 A., 892 ; Fairfield v. Oldtown, 73 Me., 577; Linneus v. Sidney, 70 Me., 114; Smithfield v. Waterville, 64 Me., 412; Fayette v. Livermore, 62 Me., 229; Windsor v. … It has never been held here or elsewhere, so far as research discloses, that overseers of the poor can delegate the exercise of their discretionary powers to persons not on the board.

Johnson v. Gerrish

518 A.2d 721 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 10, 1986

Isaacson v. Husson College, 332 A.2d 757, 762 (Me.1975) (quoting State v. Knight, 43 Me. 11, 141 (1857)). … Unlike our recent case of Rowe v.