Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.22s
Gilchrist v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF BOROUGH OF HADDONFIELD
155 N.J. Super. 358 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 17, 1978
GILCHRIST, COMPLAINANT-RESPONDENT, v. THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE BOROUGH OF HADDONFIELD, CAMDEN COUNTY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued November 21, 1977. … The Board's contention that the Division on Civil Rights was without jurisdiction in this matter cannot be dismissed in a cavalier fashion. In New York Bd. of Higher Ed. v.
Cited 12 timesPublishedRahway Valley Railroad v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners
127 N.J.L. 164 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 25, 1941
West Jersey and Seashore Railroad Co. v. Public Utility Board, 87 N. J. L. 170; Erie Railroad Co. v. Public Utility Board, 89 Id. 57; affirmed, 90 Id. 672; Fornarotto v. … Perth Amboy v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners, 98 N. J. L. 106.
Cited 5 timesPublishedImpey v. Board of Educ. of Borough of Shrewsbury
142 N.J. 388 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 14, 1995
In Dennery v. … Viemeister v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedAtlantic & Suburban Railway Co. v. Board of Chosen Freeholders
84 N.J. Eq. 618 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 16, 1915
Leaming, V. C. … In Ross v. Union Pacific Railway Co., 1 Woolw. 26 , 36, Mr.
Cited 2 timesPublishedDarrell v. Governing Body of Township of Clark
169 N.J. Super. 127 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 25, 1979
Authority upon which Brown Boveri, Inc. depends is dictum, appearing in cases of questionable current authority. Compare Ranney v. … Istituto Pontificio Delle Maestre Filippini, 20 N.J. 189, 198-199 (1955), and Moriarty v. Pozner, 21 N.J. 199, 211 (1956), relied upon in Brown v. Boveri, Inc., supra at 186, with Black v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedBorg v. Board of State Canvassers of N.J.
131 N.J.L. 105 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 8, 1944
This is an application for a writ of certiorari to review the statement of the Board of State Canvassers provided for by chapter 217 of the laws of 1943' (Pamph. … Reed v. Board, 119 N. J. L. 115, 118. The gravamen *107 of the argument for prosecutors is that the constitution cannot be amended or revised in any such manner as proposed.
Cited 1 timesPublishedTide Water Pipe Co. v. State Board of Assessors
57 N.J.L. 516 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1895
Liverpool Insurance Co. v. … Tide Water Pipe Co. v. Berry, 23 Vroom 308 .
Cited 7 timesPublishedBoard of Education of Jefferson v. National Union Bank
121 N.J.L. 177 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 16, 1938
Harter v. Mechanics Bank, 63 N. J. L. 578; Pratt v. Union National Bank, 79 Id. 117; Pannonia Building and Loan v. West Side Trust Co., 93 Id. 377. … That the frauds by the board’s officers cannot be constructively imputed to the board is clear from the law as laid down in Pannonia Building and Loan Association v. West Side Trust Co., 93 N. J. L. 377; Tomlin v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedTyehimba v. New Jersey State Parole Board
214 N.J. Super. 62 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 20, 1986
Parole Bd. v. Byrne, supra, 93 TV./, at 196-197. … It is quite clear that the procedure followed by the parole board was exactly that set forth by the Supreme Court in N.J. Parole Bd. v. Byrne, supra, 93 N.J. at 210 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedYardville Supply Co. v. Board of Review
111 N.J. 583 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 24, 1988
Cited 0 timesPublishedDingleberry v. Board of Review, Department of Labor & Industry
154 N.J. Super. 415 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 9, 1977
The opinion of the court v/as delivered by Milmed, J. A, D. … The Board of Review affirmed the decision of the Appeal Tribunal. This appeal followed.
Cited 1 timesPublishedSouth Orange-Maplewood Education Ass'n v. Board of Education
146 N.J. Super. 457 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 18, 1977
A. 34:13A-5.3; Englewood Bd. of Ed. v. Englewood Teachers Ass’n, 64 N. J. 1 (1973). … Red Bank Bd. of Ed. v. Warrington, 138 N. J. Super. 564, 571-573 (App. Div. 1976'); but consider the jurisdiction of the New Jersey State Board of Mediation, N. J. S.
Cited 4 timesPublishedTownship of Washington v. Mercer County Board of Taxation
85 N.J.L. 547 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 4, 1914
Having made such changes as in their judgment may be necessary for the purpose aforesaid, the act provides: “The county board of taxation (4 Comp. … Their powers are entirely statutory, and their acts necessarily must consist with, the powers thus delegated, or with such powers as, e-v necessitate, arise out of and from the express provisions of the act prescribing their
Cited 6 timesPublishedTaxpayers Association v. City of Cape May
2 N.J. Super. 27 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 16, 1949
State Board of Assessors, 80 N.J.L. 516 (Sup.Ct. 1910) where an application to inspect railroad returns filed with the State Board of Assessors was likewise granted. See Lum v. McCarty, 39 N.J.L. 287 , 289 (E. … See Pressman v.
Cited 23 timesPublishedLocal 866 v. Lodi Board of Education
149 N.J. Super. 147 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 11, 1977
See United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp., 363 U. S. 564, 570 , 80 S. Ct. 1358 , 4 L. Ed. 2d 1424 (1960); Held v. Comfort Bus Line, Inc., 136 N. J. L. 640, 642 (Sup. Ct. 1948). Igoe Bros., Inc. v. … J. 583 (1973) ; Harsen v. West Milford Tp. Bd. of Ed., 132 N. J. Super. 365, 372 (Law Div. 1975); Held v. Comfort Bus Line, Inc., supra at 641-642; Schencks Adm’r v. Cuttrell, 2 N. J. Eq. 297, 301 (Ch. 1840).
Cited 0 timesPublishedState Board of Child Welfare v. P. G. F.
57 N.J. Super. 370 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 29, 1959
Applying the reasoning of Splitdorf v. … Albanese v. Richter, 67 Fed. Supp. 771 (D. C. N. J. 1946).
Cited 2 timesPublishedHall v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners
112 N.J. Super. 206 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 16, 1970
Close v. Kordulak Bros., 44 N. J. 589 (1965). The Board’s adoption of Regulations 14:403-5 (a) and (b) and its interpretation of those regulations must be accorded a presumption of reasonableness. … The petitioner and amicus curiae did not sustain their burden of showing that the regulations and the Board’s interpretation of them was unreasonable. Consolidated Coal Co. v. Kandle, 105 N. J. Super. 104, 118-119 (App.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBerman v. Valley Hospital & Board of Trustees
99 N.J. 229 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 22, 1985
Cited 0 timesPublishedBueno v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, TEACHERS'PENSION AND ANNUITY FUND
199 N.J. 540 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 3, 2009
973 A.2d 944 (2009) 199 N.J. 540 BUENO v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, TEACHERS' PENSION & ANNUITY FUND, DIVISION OF PENSIONS AND BENEFITS. C-711 September Term 2008, 63,646 Supreme Court of New Jersey. June 3, 2009.
Cited 1 timesPublishedBOARD OF EDUCATION OF TOWNSHIP OF MIDDLETOWN v. Witmer
200 N.J. 547 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 16, 2009
985 A.2d 646 (2009) 200 N.J. 547 BOARD OF EDUCATION OF TOWNSHIP OF MIDDLETOWN v. WITMER. No. C-450 September Term 2009, 064827 Supreme Court of New Jersey. December 16, 2009. Petition for Certification Denied.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna