Case law

Brackett v. Brewer

71 Me. 478 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 3, 1880

Anderson v. Brock, Maine, 243. … Noyes v. Loring, 55 Maine, 408, and cases there cited. Bartlett v. Tucker, 104 Mass. 336 , and cases.

Newton v. Newbegin

43 Me. 293 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1857

In the case of Call v. … Howard v. Brown and al., 21 Maine R., 385. Exceptions overruled.

Crafts v. Quinn

482 A.2d 825 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 28, 1984

White, 415 U.S. 767, 783 , 94 S.Ct. 1296, 1307 , 39 L.Ed.2d 744 (1974); see Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. 724, 738-746 , 94 S.Ct. 1274, 1283-1287 , 39 L.Ed.2d 714 (1974). … See Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. at 730, 94 S.Ct. at 1279 . The key issue is “the degree to which the challenged restrictions operate as a mechanism to exclude certain classes of candidates from the electoral process.

Williams v. Individual Justices of the Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

245 F. Supp. 2d 221 · District Court, D. Maine · Feb 10, 2003

In Patmon v. … In Stern v.

Murdock v. Bridges

91 Me. 124 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 27, 1897

Morice v. The Bishop of Durham, 10 Ves. 522; James v. Allen , 3 Merivale, 17; Ellis v. Selby, 1 Myl. & Cr. 286; Williams v. Kershaw, 1 Keen, 227, note; Kendall v. Grange, 5 Beav. 300; Vesey v. … . & S. 69; Brown v. Yeall, 7 Ves. 50, note; Ommanny v. Butcher, Turn. & Russ. 260; Adye v. Smith, 44 Conn. 60 . .

Cole v. Maine School Administrative District No. 1

350 F. Supp. 2d 143 · District Court, D. Maine · Dec 3, 2004

In Ray v. … Glass v.

Vose v. Manly

19 Me. 331 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 15, 1841

It has, however, been already under our consideration, and according to our conviction we have previously decided, in the case, Rawson v. Brown, 18 Maine R. 216, in favor of the constitutionality of the provision. … Howard v. Folger, 15 Maine R. 447. By article 8th, no resignation of any officer shall be approved, if offered between the 1st of May and the 1st of November, unless the reasons be very urgent.

State v. Mehuren

594 A.2d 1073 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 10, 1991

When the door was opened, the officer saw an open kit that contained several brown vials, a straw, and a mirror resting on the seat between the passenger and the car door. … See *1076 Arkansas v. Sanders, 442 U.S. 753 , 99 S.Ct. 2586 , 61 L.Ed.2d 235 (1979); State v. Tarantino, 587 A.2d at 1097-98 ; State v. Blais, 416 A.2d 1253, 1257 (Me.1980). See also California v.

United States v. Petraia Maritime Ltd.

489 F. Supp. 2d 90 · District Court, D. Maine · May 22, 2007

All four crew-members testified regarding their actions and role in bypassing the OWS, discharging oily bilge and sludge waste overboard and in ultimately creating the false records maintained on board the M/V Kent Navigator … Comm’n v.

Weed v. Clark

118 Me. 466 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 21, 1920

Heath v. Jaquith, 68 Maine, 433; Jewell v. Gagne, 82 Maine, 430; Royal v. Power Company, 114 Maine, 220. … Gerding v. Walter, 29 Mo., 426 ; Morrow v. Frankish, (Del. Sup.), 89 Atl., 740 ; Nay v. Curley, 113 N. Y., 575 ; Masser v. Brown, 29 Pa. St., 128; Huntzinger v. Jones, 60 Pa., St. 170. Prof.

MMG Insurance Co. v. Podiatry Insurance Co. of America

263 F. Supp. 3d 327 · District Court, D. Maine · Apr 18, 2017

Brown, 384 A.2d at 453 . In American National Fire Insurance Company v. York County, 582 F.Supp.2d 69 (D. … See, e.g., Brown Dev. Corp. v. Hemond, 2008 ME 146 , 956 A.2d 104 ; Burrowes Corp. v. Read, 151 Me. 92 , 116 A.2d 127, 129-30 (1955).

Neubeck v. Lundquist

186 F.R.D. 249 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 14, 1999

Similarly, the Indiana Court of Appeals in Becker v. … Accord, Petrillo v. Syntex Labs., Inc., 148 Ill.App.3d 581 , 102 Ill.Dec. 172 , 499 N.E.2d 952, 962-63 (1986), superceded by statute, Kunkel v.

Benjamin v. Aroostook Medical Center

937 F. Supp. 957 · District Court, D. Maine · Aug 8, 1996

Plan v. … See Bolt v.

State v. Cefalo

396 A.2d 233 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 12, 1979

Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443, 506 , 73 S.Ct. 397 , 97 L.Ed. 469 (1963) (Opinion of Mr. Justice Frankfurter). Second, he must draw legal conclusions from these facts. … Brown v. Allen, supra 344 U.S. at 507 , 73 S.Ct. 397, 446 .

Percival v. Maine M. M. Ins.

33 Me. 242 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1851

In the conversion of logs into boards, it is probably never expected that the boards should be seasoned or planed, to make the manufacture complete. … Morton v. Fairbanks, 11 Pick. 368 . Exceptions sustained — Note. — Shepeey, C. J., did not attend at the argument, and took no part in the decision. New trial granted.

Town of Kittery v. Hoyt

291 A.2d 512 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 8, 1972

Maurer v. Snyder, 199 Md. 551 , 87 A.2d 612 (1952); Piper v. Moore, 163 Kan. 565 , 183 P.2d 965 (1947); Lemp v. Township of Millburn, 129 N.J.L. 221 , 28 A.2d 767 (1942); Hancock v. City of Concord, N. … H., 285 A.2d 791 (1971); Boreth v. Philadelphia Zoning Board of Adjustment, 396 Pa. 82 , 151 A.2d 474 (1959), 73 A.L.R.2d 436 (1960).

State v. Barrows

76 Me. 401 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 26, 1884

The Queen v. Thompson, L. R. 1 C. C. 378; The Queen v. Winsor, L. R. 1 Q. B. 390; The Queen v. Payne, L. R. 1 C. C. 349; The Queen v. Deeley, 11 Cox. C. C. 607. … Com. v. Brown, 130 Mass. 279 . If the argument for the defendant is sound, then the common law rule has become reversed.

Stevens v. Parsons

80 Me. 351 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 5, 1888

Little v. Rogers, 1 Met. 108 ; Masters v. Barretto, 8 C. B. 433; Brown v. De Winton, 6 C. B. 336 ; Gay v. Lander, 6 C. B. 336 ; Hooper v. Williams, 2 Ex. 13 ; Absalon v. Marks, 11 Q. B. 19. … Bigelow v. Colton, Clapp v. Rice , and Dubois v.

Inhabitants of Georgetown v. Hanscome

108 Me. 131 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 11, 1911

As was said in Grower v. … Ellsworth v. Brown, 53 Maine, 519; Farmingdale v. Berlin Mills Co., 93 Maine, 333.

United States v. Allen

344 F. Supp. 2d 767 · District Court, D. Maine · Nov 16, 2004

It will not, therefore, cause a violation of the Apprendi v. New Jersey 1 principle even if the fact-finding rhetoric of the Blakely v. … See United States v. Brown, 335 F.Supp.2d 146, 149 (D.Me.2004)(Hornby, D.J.). The Motion is hereby DENIED.