Case law

Local 777, Democratic Union Organizing Committee, Seafarers International Union of North America, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Yellow Cab Company and Checker Taxi Company, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, Local 777, Democratic Union, Etc., Intervenor

603 F.2d 862 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 20, 1979

The Supreme Court recently reaffirmed the rule in Brown in NLRB v. … See, e. g., Associated General Contractors v. NLRB, 564 F.2d 271 (9th Cir. 1977), SIDA of Hawaii, Inc. v. NLRB, 512 F.2d 354 (9th Cir. 1975), Brown v.

Sunworld International Airlines, Inc. v. National Transportation Safety Board

305 F. App'x 663 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 12, 2008

Loss of economic authority is a ground for revocation of a Certificate, see id. § 119.5(i); Casino Airlines, Inc. v. NTSB, 439 F.3d 715, 716 (D.C.Cir.2006), as is termination of operations, see Adm’r v. … Adm'r v. Sun Airlines, Inc., 1 N.T.S.B. 1859 , 1861 (1972).

In Re Lewis

88 A.2d 582 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 21, 1952

In Beausoliel v. … In Brown v. United States, 80 U.S.App.

Allen v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission

538 A.2d 752 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 9, 1988

Brown v. … E.g., Simmons v. Police & Firefighters’ Retirement & Relief Board, 478 A.2d 1093, 1095 (D.C. 1984); Jadallah v.

In re Rodriguez-Quesada

122 A.3d 913 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 13, 2015

Similarly, the Board must defer to the factual findings of the Hearing Committee if those findings are supported by substantial evidence. See, e.g., In re Brown, 112 A.3d 913, 917 (D.C.2015) (per curiam). … In re Kline, 11 A.3d 261, 265 (D.C.2011) (court in disciplinary proceeding did not consider argument that was not briefed and was only raised during oral argument); Bardoff v.

United States v. Jeffrey Brown

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 17, 2021

Jeffrey Scott Brown, Appellant BEFORE: Millett, Wilkins, and Jackson, Circuit Judges JUDGMENT This appeal was considered on the record from the … See United States v. Munchel, 991 F.3d 1273, 1282 (D.C. Cir. 2021).

Maurice P. Foley Co. v. Balderson

569 F.2d 132 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 16, 1977

O’Leary v. Brown-Pacific-Maxon, Inc., 340 U.S. 504, 508 , 71 S.Ct. 470, 472 , 95 L.Ed. 483 (1951); Presley v. … V 1975). If the Board departs from that legal standard in reviewing the decision of the ALJ, we must reverse. Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores, Inc. v.

Bledsoe v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

544 A.2d 723 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 25, 1988

See Gaskins v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, 315 A.2d 567, 568 (D.C.1974). The agency claims that Ms. … Arthur v. District of Columbia Nurses’ Examining Board, 459 A.2d 141, 146 (D.C.1983).

General Teamsters Local Union No. 174 v. National Labor Relations Board

723 F.2d 966 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 20, 1983

Laborers’ District Council of Georgia and South Carolina v. NLRB, 501 F.2d 868 , 873 n. 16 (D.C.Cir.1974). The Board, however, must make clear the basis of its disagreement with the ALJ. … Compare McAx Sign Company, Inc. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Creative Food Design Ltd., T/a the Broker, Hotel & Restaurant Employees Local 25, Afl-Cio, Intervenor

852 F.2d 1295 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 26, 1988

Id.; see also Jerr-Dan Cory., 237 N.L.R.B. 302 , 303 (1978), enf'd, 601 F.2d 575 (3d Cir.1979); NLRB v. Brown and Connolly, 593 F.2d 1373, 1374 (1st Cir.1979); Georgetown Hotel v. … See NLRB v. Brown and Connolly, 593 F.2d at 1374 . However, that is not the law.

Retail Store Employees Union Local No. 400 v. National Labor Relations Board

458 F.2d 792 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 14, 1972

The Union complains that the Board order should have gone further than it did. … The Board’s petition for enforcement, No. 71-1255 will be granted. So ordered. . 188 N.L.R.B. No. 94, Feb. 17, 1971.

Action on Smoking and Health v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Action on Smoking and Health v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Action on Smoking and Health v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Action on Smoking and Health v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Air Transport Association of America, Transamerica Airlines, Inc., Intervenors

699 F.2d 1209 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 28, 1983

699 F.2d 1209 226 U.S.App.D.C. 57 ACTION ON SMOKING AND HEALTH, Petitioner, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Respondent. ACTION ON SMOKING AND HEALTH, Petitioner, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Respondent. … ACTION ON SMOKING AND HEALTH, Petitioner, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Respondent. ACTION ON SMOKING AND HEALTH, Petitioner, v.

Harbor Insurance v. Schnabel Foundation Co.

992 F. Supp. 419 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 4, 1997

See Meek v. Shepard, 484 A.2d at 581 . Mr. Brown clearly presented a standard of care based on how other subcontractors under similar conditions in this area design and install sheeting and shoring systems. 9 . … Brown and Mr.

Intl Brhd Elec 702 v. NLRB

215 F.3d 11 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 9, 2000

American Ship Building Co. v. National Labor Rela- tions Board, supra; National Labor Relations Board v. Brown, 380 U.S. 278, 85 S.Ct. 980, 13 L.Ed.2d 839 (1965); and National Labor Relations Board v. … National Labor Relations Board v. Brown, supra, 380 U.S. at 289, 85 S.Ct. at 987; American Ship Building Co. v.

Garcia v. District of Columbia

56 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 17, 1999

Board of the County Comm’rs of Bryan County, Oklahoma v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397 , 117 S.Ct. 1382, 1388, 1390 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997). … Dixon v. Brown, 38 F.3d 379 (8th Cir. 1994). Accord, Hershberger v. Scaletta, 33 F.3d 955 (8th Cir.1994); see Franco v. Kelly, 854 F.2d 584 (2d Cir.1988)(disciplin-ary charges expunged); Smith v.

R. & G. Orthopedic Appliances & Prosthetics, Inc. v. Curtin

596 A.2d 530 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 27, 1991

Brown as part of her own case. Ms. Brown relies on Morgan v. Commercial Union Assurance Co., 606 F.2d 554 (5th Cir.1979) and Grant v. Brandt, 796 F.2d 351 (10th Cir.1986), but neither case is in point. … As in Niles , the Board of Education sought indemnity from the physician.

Syneeda Lynn Penland v. Raymond Edwin Mabus, Jr.

181 F. Supp. 3d 100 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 20, 2016

The Board of Correction of Naval Records Ms. Penland turned to the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR). … Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 152 (D.C. Cir. 2015); Richardson v. United States, 193 F.3d 545, 548 (D.C. Cir. 1999). Ms.

James William Johnson v. Richard A. Chappell, Chairman U. S. Board of Parole

327 F.2d 888 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 16, 1964

The real point on appeal revolves around the revocation of appellant’s parole on the basis of evidence before the Board which was not the basis upon which the original arrest warrant for violation of parole had been issued … However, appellant had some six or seven months notice, prior to his final revocation hearing, that the Board considered this new evidence to be ground for revocation.

Knop Ex Rel. Avenir Corp. v. MacKall

640 F. Supp. 2d 58 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 6, 2009

Johnson-Brown, 257 F.Supp.2d at 181 (citing Garcia v. Amfels, Inc., 254 F.3d 585, 588 (5th Cir. 2001)). A. … Johnson-Brown, 257 F.Supp.2d at 181 (citing Garcia, 254 F.3d at 588 ); see Garbie v.

Belcon Inc. v. District of Columbia Water & Sewer Authority

826 A.2d 380 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 12, 2003

Ross v. Fierro, 659 A.2d 234 , 239 n. 5 (D.C.1995) (quoting Brown v. United States, 590 A.2d 1008 , 1021 n. 19 (D.C.1991)). … Co. v.