Case law

Tektronix, Inc. v. Nazari

117 Or. App. 409 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 30, 1992

See Olson v. State Ind. Acc. Com., 222 Or 407 , 352 P2d 1096 (1960); Destael v. Nicolai Co., 80 Or App 596 , 723 P2d 348 (1986). … Albany General Hospital v. Gasperino, 113 Or App 411 , 833 P2d 1292 (1992).

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Geurts

290 Or. 241 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 16, 1980

It is enough if the Board of Governors takes responsibility for the composition of a trial board in *245 fact and not only in law, that is to say, if the proposed membership is reported to the Board of Governors and the board … U S Const, amend V: "No person shall ... be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, . . .” 8 Cf. Megdal v. Oregon State Board of Dental Examiners, 288 Or 293 , 605 P2d 273 (1980).

Hibbs v. Sedgwick CMS (A180280)

340 Or. App. 421 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 14, 2025

Weyerhaeuser Co. v. … In Icenhower v.

Long v. SAIF Corp.

278 Or. App. 88 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 4, 2016

SAIF responds that the board’s order is supported by substantial evidence and reason, and we agree. Agency orders, including orders of the board, must be supported by substantial evidence and reason. Jenkins v. … Board of Parole, 356 Or 186, 195-96 , 335 P3d 828 (2014); Walker v. Providence Health System Oregon, 254 Or App 676, 686 , 298 P3d 38 , rev den, 353 Or 714 (2013).

Wasco County v. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Local No. 2752

46 Or. App. 859 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 30, 1980

The rationale of the rule was explained by the Supreme Court in Labor Board v. … , e.g., Marbet v.

Wemett v. Mount

134 Or. 305 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 11, 1930

Brown, 52 Or. 33 ( 95 P. 1114 ). … J., Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

SAIF Corp. v. Kurcin

334 Or. 399 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 25, 2002

SAIF v. Kurcin, 160 Or App 489, 494 , 981 P2d 1277 (1999). We allowed claimant’s petition for review. We reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals and affirm the Board’s order. … The Court of Appeals concluded that “[w]hether to grant a continuance is a matter committed to the discretion of the Board.” SAIF v. Kurcin, 160 Or App at 492 .

Maddox v. Clackamas County School District No. 25

293 Or. 27 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 27, 1982

Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 US at 570-571. … Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 US at 573. Plaintiff has not pointed to any charge by the school board which reflects adversely on these qualities.

McCabe-Duprey Tanning Co. v. Eubanks

57 Or. 44 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 3, 1910

Brown, contra. Opinion by Mr. Chief Justice Moore. 1. This is a motion to dismiss an appeal on the ground that the transcript was not filed within the prescribed time. … Brown. For respondent there was a brief over the name of Mr. Marcus W. Robbins. The motion will therefore be denied. Denied.

Miller v. Grants Pass Irrigation District

297 Or. 312 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 26, 1984

Stevenson v. State of Oregon, supra, 290 Or at 9-10 . … See Bradford v. Davis, 290 Or 855, 864-65 , 626 P2d 1376 (1981).

Livesley v. Johnston

45 Or. 30 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 16, 1904

Its terms unmistakably import a sale of the hops to the amount of 20,000 pounds, to be grown by Johnston in each of the five years designated, and an agreement upon his part *42 to deliver them at Woodburn, on board the cars … Co. v. Town of Chico, (C. C.) 24 Fed. 893 ; Zaleski v. Clark, 44 Conn. 218 ( 26 Am. Rep. 446 ); McCarren v. McNulty, 7 Gray, 139 ; Brown v. Foster, 113 Mass. 136 ( 18 Am. Rep. 463 ); Gibson v.

SAIF Corp. v. Wart

192 Or. App. 505 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 24, 2004

See Schuler v. … See Schoch v.

Reynolds v. USF Reddaway, Inc.

283 Or. App. 21 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 21, 2016

Corp. v. … See also Yi v.

Chase v. Schleuning

83 Or. App. 149 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 17, 1986

We decided that question adversely to plaintiffs position in Brown v. Portland School Dist. # 1, 48 Or App 571 , 617 P2d 665 (1980), rev’d on other grounds 291 Or 77 , 628 P2d 1183 (1981). … In addition to the equal privileges argument, Brown also involved the question of whether the plaintiffs notice complied with the statute. We held that it did not.

SAIF Corp. v. January

166 Or. App. 620 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 19, 2000

In addition to the requirement that findings be supported by substantial evidence, the Board must provide a “sufficient explanation to allow a reviewing court to examine the agency’s action.” Schoch v. … Leupold & Stevens, 325 Or 112, 118 , 934 P2d 410 (1997); see also Drew v.

Hofer v. Carson

102 Or. 545 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 10, 1922

Wakefield, 133 Mass. 240 ; Julienne v. Jackson, 69 Miss. 34 ( 10 South. 43 , 30 Am. St. Rep. 526 ); Morey v. Brown, 42 N. H. 373; Fox v. Mohawk & H. River Humeme Soc., 165 N. Y. 517 ( 59 N. E. 353 , 80 Am. St. … Rep. 459 ), the legislation was upheld as an exercise of the police power as distinguished from the taxing power and in Cooley v. Board of Wardens, 12 How. 299 ( 13 L.

Zandbergen v. Johnson

24 Or. App. 151 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 19, 1976

SAIF, 261 Or 117 , 492 P2d 472 (1972); Nollen v. SAIF, 23 Or App 420 , 542 P2d 932 (1975); Schneider v. Emanuel Hospital, 20 Or App 599 , 532 P2d 1146 , Sup Ct review denied (1975); Stevens v. … SAIF, 20 Or App 412 , 531 P2d 921 (1975); Murphy v. SAIF, 13 Or App 105 , 508 P2d 227 (1973); and Burkholder v. SAIF, 11 Or App 334 , 502 P2d 1394 (1972).

Volk v. America West Airlines

135 Or. App. 565 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 26, 1995

The Board went on to conclude, relying on our decisions in Johnson v. Capitol Car Wash, 127 Or App 49 , 871 P2d 473 (1994), and Lebanon Plywood v. … Claimant argues that the Board’s reliance on Lebanon Plywood v. Seiber and Johnson v. Capitol Car Wash was misplaced and that the Board abused its discretion in failing to apply the provisions of OAR 438-15-085(2).

Frady v. Morrow

169 Or. App. 250 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 2, 2000

See State v. … See Godleske v.

Employer Solutions Staffing Group v. SAIF

343 Or. App. 206 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 4, 2025

Montez v. … Keenon v.