Case law

Bledsoe v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

544 A.2d 723 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 25, 1988

See Gaskins v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, 315 A.2d 567, 568 (D.C.1974). The agency claims that Ms. … Arthur v. District of Columbia Nurses’ Examining Board, 459 A.2d 141, 146 (D.C.1983).

In re Joseph

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 19, 2023

See, e.g., Joseph v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc., No. B288641, 2019 WL 2498400, at *2 (Cal. Ct. App. June 17, 2019) (declining to review the trial court’s “declar[ation that] Joseph was a vexatious litigant”); Joseph v. … In re Brown, 617 A.2d 194, 197 n.11 (D.C. 1992) (quoting In re Barton, 432 A.2d 1335, 1336 (Md. 1981)). Mr.

Singletary v. District of Columbia

685 F. Supp. 2d 81 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 18, 2010

Commissioners of Bryan Co. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 407 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997). … Brown, 520 U.S. at 404 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 ; cf. City of Canton v.

Meat Cutters U. Local 81 of A.M.C. v. National Labor Relations Board

458 F.2d 794 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 25, 1972

P 12,375 MEAT CUTTERS UNION LOCAL 81 OF the AMALGAMATED MEAT CUTTERS AND BUTCHER WORKMEN OF NORTH AMERICA, AFL-CIO, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, Safeway Stores, Intervenor. No. 24709. … B. v.

Carl C. Smuck, a Member of the Board of Education of the District of Columbia v. Julius W. Hobson, Carl F. Hansen, Superintendent of Schools of the District of Columbia v. Julius W. Hobson

408 F.2d 175 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 21, 1969

Rogers v. Paul, 382 U.S. 198 , 86 S.Ct. 358 (1965); Bradley v. School Board, 382 U.S. 103 , 86 S.Ct. 224 (1965); Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954); Sweatt v. … essential in light of Brown v.

Retail Store Employees Union, Local 1001 v. National Labor Relations Board

627 F.2d 1133 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 7, 1980

limited judicial review.' " Id. at 350 , 98 S.Ct. at 660 , quoting Labor Board v. … NLRB, 105 U.S.App.D.C. 271, 276 , 266 F.2d 675, 680 (1959) (Board erred in failing to consider all material facts) 30 See NLRB v.

Harrington v. Moss

407 A.2d 658 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 17, 1979

O’Rourke v. … O’Leary v. Brown-Pacific-Maxon, Inc., 340 U.S. 504, 507 , 71 S.Ct. 470, 472 , 95 L.Ed. 483 (1951). “Nor is it necessary that the employee be engaged at the time of the injury in activity of benefit to this employer.”

Csicseri v. Bowsher

862 F. Supp. 547 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 16, 1994

Kearns himself admitted that his appraisals were not “exceptional across the board”. PLEx. 66-74. Tr.Vol. II 366; Tr.Vol. IV 739-42; Tr.Vol. V 779-80, 796-97. 50. Mr. … V 909-10. 51. Julius Brown, according to plaintiffs, applied for every ECDP class from 1982 until his retirement. Defendant states that Mr.

LeFande v. District of Columbia

841 F.3d 485 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 8, 2016

Under Pickering v. … See Steel Co. v.

Adams v. District of Columbia

122 A.2d 765 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 18, 1956

Regent Restaurant, 175 Misc. 526 , 25 N.Y.S.2d 181 ; Scates v. Board of Com’rs of Union City, 196 Tenn. 274 , 265 S.W.2d 563 ; and Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. … Brown v. District of Columbia, 29 App.D.C. 273 , 25 L.R.A.,N.S., 98. 8 . Harris v. District of Columbia, 256 U.S. 650 , 41 S.Ct. 610 , 65 L.Ed. 1146 ; District of Columbia v.

Dilley v. Alexander

603 F.2d 914 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 26, 1979

See Harmon v. Brucker, supra; Geiger v. Brown, 136 U.S.App.D.C. 132, 135-37 , 419 F.2d 714, 717-19 (1969); Roberts v. Vance, 119 U.S.App.D.C. 367 , 371, 343 F.2d 236, 240 (1964). … Accord, United States v. Brown, 206 U.S. 240, 244 , 27 S.Ct. 620 , 51 L.Ed. 1046 (1907). We agree with the Army that McClaughry’s jurisdictionally-based analysis is in-apposite here.

Vaughn v. United States

598 A.2d 425 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 29, 1991

REPORT OF THE COUNCIL OF THE DistRict of Columbia, Committee on the Judiciary, On Bill 6-47, “The Youth Rehabilitation Act of 1985,” (Report) at 2 (June 19, 1985); see also Brown v. … See Rhema Christian Center v. Board of Zoning Adjustment, 515 A.2d 189, 192-93 (D.C.1986) (giving preclusive effect to a finding by the Board of Zoning Adjustment); Foster v.

Truck Drivers & Helpers Local No. 728 v. National Labor Relations Board

415 F.2d 986 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 23, 1969

NLRB, 131 U.S.App.D.C. 195 , 403 F.2d 921 , cert. denied, Georgia Highway Express Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, 393 U.S. 935 , 89 S.Ct. 296 , 21 L.Ed.2d 272 (1968). . … Rio Grande Family Radio Fellowship, Inc. v. FCC, 132 U.S.App.D.C. 128 , 406 F.2d 664 (1968). . See NLRB v.

International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 513 v. National Labor Relations Board

635 F.3d 1233 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 5, 2011

Cir. 2002), the Board here does not even purport to rely on an interpretation of the Act’s language. Its brief – although not its opinion – relies for support of the Board’s policy on two Supreme Court cases: NLRB v. … Co., 388 U.S. 175 (1967), and Scofield v.

Shinabargar v. Board of Trustees of the University of the District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 4, 2015

a motion to dismiss (“Motion”) filed by Defendants Board of 16 Trustees of The University of The District of Columbia (“UDC”), Katherine S. … See Goldlawr, Inc. v.

Air Alliance Houston v. U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 4, 2019

Circuit’s decision in Friends of Animals v. Jewell also contradicts the Board’s excessively narrow view of informational standing. See 824 F.3d 1033 (D.C. Cir. 2016). … In AARP v. U.S.

Robert A. Harris v. Walter N. Tobriner

304 F.2d 377 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 3, 1962

Compare Jordan v. American Eagle Fire Ins. Co., 83 U.S.App.D.C. 192 , 169 F.2d 281 (1948); Columbia Auto Loan v. Jordan, 90 U.S.App.D.C. 222 , 196 F.2d 568 (1952). See also Jaffe v. … Co. v. City of Conneaut, 167 Fed. 274 (6th Cir. 1909); Dierks Lumber & Coal Co. v. Brown, 19 F.2d 732 (8th Cir. 1927).

National Labor Relations Board v. Henry Cauthorne, an Individual, T/a Cauthorne Trucking

691 F.2d 1023 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 26, 1982

NLRB, 598 F.2d 267 , 272 (D.C.Cir. 1979), but we have recognized that its resolution is largely a matter for the Board’s expertise, see United Packinghouse, Food & Allied Workers Int’l Union v. … To support a finding of bad faith, in short, the Board must point to evidence that the party’s attitude was inconsistent with its duty to seek an agreement, see Seattle-First Nat’l Bank v.

Hyatt Management Corporation of New York, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

817 F.2d 140 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 1, 1987

In such a situation, the Board is authorized to order the offending party to execute and honor the agreement. In NLRB v. … See Hinson v.

Robert H. Mourning v. National Labor Relations Board, McDonnell Douglas Corporation, Intervenor

559 F.2d 768 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 13, 1977

See Illinois State Journal-Register, Inc. v. N.L.R.B., 412 F.2d 37, 44 (7th Cir. 1969); N.L.R.B. v. Sayers Printing Co., 453 F.2d 810, 815 (8th Cir. 1971); N.L.R.B. v. … Gulf Bottlers, Inc. v. NLRB, 369 U.S. 843 , 82 S.Ct. 875 , 7 L.Ed.2d 847 . .