Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersDC

10,000+ results

2.13s

  • Food Store Employees Union, Local No. 347 v. National Labor Relations Board

    433 F.2d 541 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 4, 1970

    The Board’s opinion in this case made findings which meet the requirements subsequently set forth in N.L.R.B. v. … International Union of Electrical Radio and Machine Workers v. NLRB [Tiidee Products, Inc.], 138 U.S.App.D.C. 249 , 426 F.2d 1243 , cert. denied, Tidee Products, Inc. v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Greenhouse v. Geren

    574 F. Supp. 2d 57 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 2, 2008

    Accordingly, an employee seeking to challenge a retaliatory evaluation would be required to go through the OSC before appealing to the Board. See Cruz v. … Hubbard v. EPA, 809 F.2d 1 (D.C.Cir.1986) (citing Clarkson v. IRS, 678 F.2d 1368 ).

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Seaboard & Western Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board (Pan American Airways, Inc., Intervenors)

    181 F.2d 777 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 5, 1949

    Ashbacker Radio Corp. v. Federal Communications Comm., 1945, 326 U.S. 327 , 66 S.Ct. 148 . 90 L.Ed. 108 . 6 . Mallory Coal Co. v. … C., 1943, 319 U.S. 239 , 63 S.Ct. 1035 , 87 D.Ed. 1374; Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Baltimore & O. R. Co., 1947, 331 U.S. 519 , 67 S.Ct. 1387 , 91 L.Ed. 1646 ; Republic Natural Gas Co. v.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Embassy of the People's Republic of Benin v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

    534 A.2d 310 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 30, 1987

    See Kopff v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, 381 A.2d 1372, 1384 (D.C.1977). 9 . … Board of Zoning Appeals, 126 Conn. 648, 650-54 , 13 A.2d 675, 676-77 (1940); Scott v. Minnix, 95 Ga.App. 589, 590 , 98 S.E.2d 196, 197 (1957); Balsam v. Jagger, 231 N.Y.S.2d 450 , 452 (Sup.Ct.1962); Scott v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Huggett v. Burnet

    64 F.2d 705 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 3, 1933

    In the ease of Brewster v. Gage, 280 U. S. 327 , 50 S. Ct. 115, 117 , 74 L. … Griscom, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 22 B. T. A. 979, in which the Board of Tax Appeals reached the conclusion as in this ease that March 1,1913, should be taken as the date of the basic valuation.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Geiger Ready-Mix Company of Kansas City, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    87 F.3d 1363 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 5, 1996

    Road Sprinkler Fitters Local Union v. … See NLRB v. Special Mine Servs., Inc., 11 F.3d 88, 90 (7th Cir.1993) (“When the Board defers decision, it ought to defer the application for enforcement as well.”).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Passaic Daily News, T/a the Herald News v. National Labor Relations Board

    736 F.2d 1543 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 15, 1984

    Healthy City Board of Ed. v. … V.

    Cited 33 timesPublished
  • Great Lakes Chemical Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board

    967 F.2d 624 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 19, 1992

    NLRB, 863 F.2d 946 , 955 (D.C.Cir.1988), and the Board may rely upon both direct and circumstantial evidence in determining the employer's motive. See NLRB v. … Fairness to the Board and our own concern to avoid making an ill-informed decision counsel as much, as circuit practice attests. See, e.g., Town of Norwood v. FERC, 962 F.2d 20, 25 (D.C.Cir.1992); McBride v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Neighbors United for a Safer Community v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

    647 A.2d 793 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 26, 1994

    Davidson v. Board of Zoning Adjustment, 617 A.2d 977, 981 (D.C.1992). … In Kopff v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • United States Postal Service v. National Labor Relations Board

    969 F.2d 1064 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 30, 1992

    In ruling on the cross-application, we have authority to consider the responding party's objections to the Board's decision. 4 See Ford Motor Co. v. … We have no warrant on the facts before us to declare the Board's relief order excessive. See Virginia Elec. & Power Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Jones v. U.S. Department of Justice

    111 F. Supp. 3d 25 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 1, 2015

    Brown v. Marsh, 777 F.2d 8, 14 (D.C. Cir. 1985). 6 Failure to exhaust is not a jurisdictional bar to bringing suit under Title VII. 4 See Bowden v. … Cir. 1997); Brown v. Marsh, 777 F.2d 8, 14 (D.C.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Greater Washington Board of Trade v. District of Columbia and Sharon Pratt Dixon

    948 F.2d 1317 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 10, 1992

    WALD, Circuit Judge: Appellant Greater Washington Board of Trade (“Board”) is a nonprofit corporation that provides health insurance to its employees. … On March 27, 1991, the district court granted appellees’ motion to dismiss and denied the Board’s motion for a preliminary injunction. See Greater Wash. Bd. of Trade v. District of Columbia, No. 91-00511 (D.D.C.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Stewart, Howard P. v. Ashcroft, John

    352 F.3d 422 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 23, 2003

    Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 453 (D.C.Cir.1999). … Stewart v. Ashcroft, 211 F.Supp.2d at 173 (citing Brown, 199 F.3d at 452 ). The District Court also correctly noted that “a bruised ego” will not suffice to make an employment action adverse. Id. (quoting Flaherty v.

    Cited 304 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Schwartz Brothers, Inc., and District Records, Inc.

    475 F.2d 926 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 23, 1973

    As is always the case, the challenging party has the burden of showing that the election was not fairly conducted, for it is not up to the Board to establish the validity of the election. NLRB v. … Camera Corp. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Allen v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission

    538 A.2d 752 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 9, 1988

    Brown v. … E.g., Simmons v. Police & Firefighters’ Retirement & Relief Board, 478 A.2d 1093, 1095 (D.C. 1984); Jadallah v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Vaughn v. United States

    598 A.2d 425 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 29, 1991

    REPORT OF THE COUNCIL OF THE DistRict of Columbia, Committee on the Judiciary, On Bill 6-47, “The Youth Rehabilitation Act of 1985,” (Report) at 2 (June 19, 1985); see also Brown v. … See Rhema Christian Center v. Board of Zoning Adjustment, 515 A.2d 189, 192-93 (D.C.1986) (giving preclusive effect to a finding by the Board of Zoning Adjustment); Foster v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Bledsoe v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

    544 A.2d 723 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 25, 1988

    See Gaskins v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, 315 A.2d 567, 568 (D.C.1974). The agency claims that Ms. … Arthur v. District of Columbia Nurses’ Examining Board, 459 A.2d 141, 146 (D.C.1983).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Singletary v. District of Columbia

    685 F. Supp. 2d 81 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 18, 2010

    Commissioners of Bryan Co. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 407 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997). … Brown, 520 U.S. at 404 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 ; cf. City of Canton v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Retail Store Employees Union Local 954 v. Rothman

    298 F.2d 330 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 11, 1962

    Brown, Jr., National Labor Relations Board, with whom Messrs. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Boad, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. … Natinal Labor Relations Board, 91 U.S.App.D.C. 316 , 201 F.2d 187 (1952), and in Bandlow v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Carl C. Smuck, a Member of the Board of Education of the District of Columbia v. Julius W. Hobson, Carl F. Hansen, Superintendent of Schools of the District of Columbia v. Julius W. Hobson

    408 F.2d 175 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 21, 1969

    Rogers v. Paul, 382 U.S. 198 , 86 S.Ct. 358 (1965); Bradley v. School Board, 382 U.S. 103 , 86 S.Ct. 224 (1965); Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954); Sweatt v. … essential in light of Brown v.

    Cited 121 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.