Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.13s
Food Store Employees Union, Local No. 347 v. National Labor Relations Board
433 F.2d 541 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 4, 1970
The Board’s opinion in this case made findings which meet the requirements subsequently set forth in N.L.R.B. v. … International Union of Electrical Radio and Machine Workers v. NLRB [Tiidee Products, Inc.], 138 U.S.App.D.C. 249 , 426 F.2d 1243 , cert. denied, Tidee Products, Inc. v.
Cited 6 timesPublished574 F. Supp. 2d 57 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 2, 2008
Accordingly, an employee seeking to challenge a retaliatory evaluation would be required to go through the OSC before appealing to the Board. See Cruz v. … Hubbard v. EPA, 809 F.2d 1 (D.C.Cir.1986) (citing Clarkson v. IRS, 678 F.2d 1368 ).
Cited 15 timesPublished181 F.2d 777 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 5, 1949
Ashbacker Radio Corp. v. Federal Communications Comm., 1945, 326 U.S. 327 , 66 S.Ct. 148 . 90 L.Ed. 108 . 6 . Mallory Coal Co. v. … C., 1943, 319 U.S. 239 , 63 S.Ct. 1035 , 87 D.Ed. 1374; Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Baltimore & O. R. Co., 1947, 331 U.S. 519 , 67 S.Ct. 1387 , 91 L.Ed. 1646 ; Republic Natural Gas Co. v.
Cited 23 timesPublishedEmbassy of the People's Republic of Benin v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment
534 A.2d 310 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 30, 1987
See Kopff v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, 381 A.2d 1372, 1384 (D.C.1977). 9 . … Board of Zoning Appeals, 126 Conn. 648, 650-54 , 13 A.2d 675, 676-77 (1940); Scott v. Minnix, 95 Ga.App. 589, 590 , 98 S.E.2d 196, 197 (1957); Balsam v. Jagger, 231 N.Y.S.2d 450 , 452 (Sup.Ct.1962); Scott v.
Cited 11 timesPublished64 F.2d 705 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 3, 1933
In the ease of Brewster v. Gage, 280 U. S. 327 , 50 S. Ct. 115, 117 , 74 L. … Griscom, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 22 B. T. A. 979, in which the Board of Tax Appeals reached the conclusion as in this ease that March 1,1913, should be taken as the date of the basic valuation.
Cited 7 timesPublishedGeiger Ready-Mix Company of Kansas City, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
87 F.3d 1363 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 5, 1996
Road Sprinkler Fitters Local Union v. … See NLRB v. Special Mine Servs., Inc., 11 F.3d 88, 90 (7th Cir.1993) (“When the Board defers decision, it ought to defer the application for enforcement as well.”).
Cited 5 timesPublishedPassaic Daily News, T/a the Herald News v. National Labor Relations Board
736 F.2d 1543 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 15, 1984
Healthy City Board of Ed. v. … V.
Cited 33 timesPublishedGreat Lakes Chemical Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board
967 F.2d 624 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 19, 1992
NLRB, 863 F.2d 946 , 955 (D.C.Cir.1988), and the Board may rely upon both direct and circumstantial evidence in determining the employer's motive. See NLRB v. … Fairness to the Board and our own concern to avoid making an ill-informed decision counsel as much, as circuit practice attests. See, e.g., Town of Norwood v. FERC, 962 F.2d 20, 25 (D.C.Cir.1992); McBride v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNeighbors United for a Safer Community v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment
647 A.2d 793 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 26, 1994
Davidson v. Board of Zoning Adjustment, 617 A.2d 977, 981 (D.C.1992). … In Kopff v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedUnited States Postal Service v. National Labor Relations Board
969 F.2d 1064 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 30, 1992
In ruling on the cross-application, we have authority to consider the responding party's objections to the Board's decision. 4 See Ford Motor Co. v. … We have no warrant on the facts before us to declare the Board's relief order excessive. See Virginia Elec. & Power Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedJones v. U.S. Department of Justice
111 F. Supp. 3d 25 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 1, 2015
Brown v. Marsh, 777 F.2d 8, 14 (D.C. Cir. 1985). 6 Failure to exhaust is not a jurisdictional bar to bringing suit under Title VII. 4 See Bowden v. … Cir. 1997); Brown v. Marsh, 777 F.2d 8, 14 (D.C.
Cited 19 timesPublishedGreater Washington Board of Trade v. District of Columbia and Sharon Pratt Dixon
948 F.2d 1317 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 10, 1992
WALD, Circuit Judge: Appellant Greater Washington Board of Trade (“Board”) is a nonprofit corporation that provides health insurance to its employees. … On March 27, 1991, the district court granted appellees’ motion to dismiss and denied the Board’s motion for a preliminary injunction. See Greater Wash. Bd. of Trade v. District of Columbia, No. 91-00511 (D.D.C.
Cited 11 timesPublishedStewart, Howard P. v. Ashcroft, John
352 F.3d 422 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 23, 2003
Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 453 (D.C.Cir.1999). … Stewart v. Ashcroft, 211 F.Supp.2d at 173 (citing Brown, 199 F.3d at 452 ). The District Court also correctly noted that “a bruised ego” will not suffice to make an employment action adverse. Id. (quoting Flaherty v.
Cited 304 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Schwartz Brothers, Inc., and District Records, Inc.
475 F.2d 926 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 23, 1973
As is always the case, the challenging party has the burden of showing that the election was not fairly conducted, for it is not up to the Board to establish the validity of the election. NLRB v. … Camera Corp. v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedAllen v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission
538 A.2d 752 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 9, 1988
Brown v. … E.g., Simmons v. Police & Firefighters’ Retirement & Relief Board, 478 A.2d 1093, 1095 (D.C. 1984); Jadallah v.
Cited 4 timesPublished598 A.2d 425 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 29, 1991
REPORT OF THE COUNCIL OF THE DistRict of Columbia, Committee on the Judiciary, On Bill 6-47, “The Youth Rehabilitation Act of 1985,” (Report) at 2 (June 19, 1985); see also Brown v. … See Rhema Christian Center v. Board of Zoning Adjustment, 515 A.2d 189, 192-93 (D.C.1986) (giving preclusive effect to a finding by the Board of Zoning Adjustment); Foster v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedBledsoe v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
544 A.2d 723 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 25, 1988
See Gaskins v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, 315 A.2d 567, 568 (D.C.1974). The agency claims that Ms. … Arthur v. District of Columbia Nurses’ Examining Board, 459 A.2d 141, 146 (D.C.1983).
Cited 2 timesPublishedSingletary v. District of Columbia
685 F. Supp. 2d 81 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 18, 2010
Commissioners of Bryan Co. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 407 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997). … Brown, 520 U.S. at 404 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 ; cf. City of Canton v.
Cited 14 timesPublishedRetail Store Employees Union Local 954 v. Rothman
298 F.2d 330 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 11, 1962
Brown, Jr., National Labor Relations Board, with whom Messrs. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Boad, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. … Natinal Labor Relations Board, 91 U.S.App.D.C. 316 , 201 F.2d 187 (1952), and in Bandlow v.
Cited 1 timesPublished408 F.2d 175 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 21, 1969
Rogers v. Paul, 382 U.S. 198 , 86 S.Ct. 358 (1965); Bradley v. School Board, 382 U.S. 103 , 86 S.Ct. 224 (1965); Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954); Sweatt v. … essential in light of Brown v.
Cited 121 timesPublished
Ask Donna