Case law

Nicklaus v. Goodspeed

56 Or. 184 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 19, 1910

There is no power granted to the district boundary board to abolish or destroy a district, and where such power is not granted it does not exist. School District v. Palmer, 41 Or. 485 ( 69 Pac. 453 .) … Taylor v. Robertson, 16 Utah, 330 ( 52 Pac. 1 .)

Employment Division v. Scott MacHinery Co.

48 Or. App. 61 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 2, 1980

"McPherson v. … Oliver v. Employment Division, 40 Or App 487 , 595 P2d 1252 (1979).

Compensation of Harris v. SAIF Corp.

292 Or. 683 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 23, 1982

See Gettman v. SAIF, 289 Or 609, 614 , 616 P2d 473 (1980); Bentley v. SAIF, supra, 38 Or App at 478 ; 3 Larson, supra at §§ 81.20-81.33. … See also Hoffmeister v. State Indus. Acc.

State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. Maddox

295 Or. 448 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 2, 1983

“February 19,1980: Court of Appeals affirms (without opinion) the Board’s order in compensability case. Maddox v. SAIF, 44 Or App 520 , 605 P2d 1391 (1980). … “March 9,1981: Court of Appeals remands compensability case to Board. Maddox v. SAIF, 51 Or App 2 , 624 P2d 643 (1981). *451 “December 7,1981: Board on remand holds claim not compensable.

Terry v. Title & Trust Co.

207 Or. 356 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 21, 1956

Brown is insolvent. … See opinion in the case of Gower v. State Tax Commission, this day written. Reversed.

State v. Miglavs

Oregon Supreme Court · May 20, 2004

State v. Miglavs , 186 Or App 420 , 63 P3d 1202 (2003). We allowed defendant's petition for review. … See State v.

Delgado v. Souders

146 Or. App. 580 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 5, 1997

First, he asserts that, although denominated a “civil” proceeding, an action under ORS 30.866 is “criminal in nature” under the rationale of Brown v. Multnomah County Dist. Ct., 280 Or 95 , 570 P2d 52 (1977). … But see Megdal v. Board of Dental Examiners, 288 Or 293 , 605 P2d 273 (1980).

Case v. Chambers

210 Or. 680 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 3, 1957

Justice Brown’s specially concurring opinion in Smith Securities Co. v. Multnomah County, 98 Or 418, 427-431 , 192 P 654 , 194 P 428 , with Appeal of Kliks, 158 Or 669, 686 , 76 P2d 974 , and Tax Com *696 mission v. … Off v. Morehead, 235 *700 Ill 40, 85 NE 264 ; Frederick v. Dettary, 318 Mich 252 , 28 NW2d 94 ; Swift v. Tempelos, 178 NC 487, 101 SE 8 ; Axtell v. Word (Tex Civ App) 29 SW2d 421 ; Tomforde v.

Westfall v. Westfall

100 Or. 224 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 19, 1921

BROWN, J. We have set down the facts at some length in the statement for the reason that this case is out of the ordinary. The contradictory statements of plaintiff and defendant raise questions of veracity. … Eq. 412 ( 2 Atl. 376 ); States v. States, 37 N. J. Eq. 195; Foss v. Foss, 12 Allen, 26 ; Crehore v. Crehore, 97 Mass. 330 ( 93 Am. Dec. 98 ); Carris v. Carris, 24 N. J. Eq. 516.”

School District v. Palmer

41 Or. 485 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 7, 1902

court, or the board of commissioners in counties where this board is a separate body, shall constitute a board for laying off his county in convenient school districts, such board to be styled the District Boundary Board … W. 871 ); State v. Partlow, 91 N. C. 550 ( 49 Am. Rep. 652 ); Ward v. Ward, 37 Tex. 389 .

Fox v. Zenon

106 Or. App. 37 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 20, 1991

In Penrod/Brown v. … In Moore v.

Stover v. Oregon Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision

District Court, D. Oregon · Oct 25, 2021

Hibbler v. Benedetti, 693 F.3d 1140, 1146 (9th Cir. 2012). … Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 340 (2003).

Beaudry v. Winchester Plywood Company

255 Or. 503 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 13, 1970

Co. v. Cooper, 3 Storey 168 , 53 Del 168, 166 A2d 723 (1960); Giambattista v. Thomas A. Edison, 32 NJ Super 103, 107 A2d 801 (1954); and National Zinc Company v. Hainline, 360 P2d 236 (Okla 1961). … See Matter of Detenbeck v. General Motors Corp., 309 NY 558 , 132 NE2d 840 (1956); Matter of Dorman v. New York State Dept. of Public Works, 22 App Div 2d 725, 253 NYS2d 243 (1964); and Matter of Conroy v.

Oregon Coal Co. v. Coos Co.

30 Or. 308 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 23, 1897

In *310 Smith v. … v.

Splonskofsky v. Minto

62 Or. 560 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 13, 1912

In Hamilton v. … People, 75 Ill. 561 ; Munson v. Miner, 22 Ill. 594 ; Samuels v. Drainage Com’n, 125 Ill. 536 ( 17 N. E. 829 ) ; People v. Knopf, 183 Ill. 410 ( 56 N. E. 155 ) ; Rosell v. Board of Education, 68 N. J.

Niccum v. Southcoast Lumber Co.

320 Or. 189 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 29, 1994

On judicial review, the Court of Appeals reversed, holding that the Board is authorized to resolve a claim for proposed medical treatment and remanded the case for reconsideration. Niccum v. … This court held in Martin v. City of Albany, 320 Or 175 , 880 P2d 926 (1994), that ORS 656.327(l)(a) does not authorize the director to review a dispute over proposed medical treatment.

Harwell v. Argonaut Insurance

296 Or. 505 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 6, 1984

We allowed review because the “Court of Appeals may have affirmed the Board as the result of an erroneous interpretation of the law.” Gettman v. … On the other hand, the referee, the Board, or the Court of Appeals could not be faulted if they read our cases of Walker v. Compensation Department, supra, and Wilson v. State Ind. Acc.

Partlow v. Clark

295 Or. 778 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 25, 1983

Temple v. Osburn, supra, was a suit to remove a cloud on 163 acres in Lane County. On January 19,1905, the patent from the United States Government to Texana Brown conveying that land was recorded in the deed records. … Texana Brown was the former wife of S. W. Brown, one of the defendants. On October 7,1905, Texana Brown for a valuable consideration conveyed the land to Minnie B. Temple, the plaintiff.

Mobley v. State Accident Insurance Fund

58 Or. App. 394 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 4, 1982

In Bentley v. … It is clear from our review of the record that claimant’s attorney expended time in the Board review. Cf. Bentley v.

State v. Fogle

254 Or. 268 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1969

Jones v. *275 City of Forrest City, 239 Ark 211 , 388 SW2d 386 (1965); State v. Fox, 177 Neb 238, 128 NW2d 576 (1964); and State v. … In Kyhl v.