Case law

Opinion No. (1989)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 18, 1989

The Court in a more recent opinion in Brown-Forman Distillers Corp. v. … The Healy predecessor, Brown-Forman and its holding. ¶ 11 In Brown-Forman Distiller Corp. v.

Boling v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.

173 Okla. 160 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 28, 1935

Broadwell v. Board Co. Com’rs, Bryan Co., 88 Okla. 147 , 211 P. 1040 ; Cornelius et al. v. Standard Royalties Co., 131 Okla. 112 , 267 P. 838 ; Jeffers & Hackett v. Johnson, 21 N. J. Law, 73. … See, also, Tiger River Pine Co. v. Maryland Cas. Co., 163 S. C. 229; 161 S. E. 491 ; Boling v. Ashbridge, 111 Okla. 66 , 238 P. 421 ; Brown & McCabe Stevedores, Inc., v. London Guarantee & Acc.

Campbell v. State Ex Rel. Brett

23 Okla. 109 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 19, 1909

et al. v. … In Newell v. People, 7 N.

State v. Claborn

65 O.B.A.J. 668 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 8, 1994

See also Mitchell v. … We also note that this Court overruled Brown in the recent case Fite v.

State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. Combs

175 P.3d 340 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 11, 2007

Brown, requested an accounting of the trust account funds. … Brown at the urging of the Bangladesh community.

Bowens v. Board of County Commissioners of Custer County

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Sep 1, 2020

In Purvey v. … See Bd. of County Comm’rs of Bryant County, Okla. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997). Rather, there must be proof of a policy or custom that is the cause of the constitutional violation.

Bisanar v. State

93 Okla. Crim. 7 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 19, 1950

The officers drove on across the bridge and found two broken boards on the approach on the west end of the bridge on the north side, and the witness stated: *10 “ * * * -a continual skid mark from those broken boards back … See Woodruff v. State, 56 Okla. Cr. 409 , 41 P. 2d 129 , Parker v. State, supra, and Chessar v. State, 63 Okla.

Bowens v. Board of County Commissioners of Custer County

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jun 2, 2020

Defendant Board argues this claim should be dismissed based on the law set forth by the Oklahoma Supreme Court in Bosh v. Cherokee Building Authority, 2013 OK 9, 305 P.3d 994. … Defendant Board argues that Bosh stands for the proposition that the only permissible claim under § 30 is one for excessive force. Defendant Board also references Barrios v.

Munson v. State

758 P.2d 324 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 29, 1988

Brown and her daughter. … Crawford v. State, 254 Ga. 435 , 330 S.E.2d 567 , 571 n. 5 (1985). See Harris v. Oklahoma, 433 U.S. 682, 683 , 97 S.Ct. 2912, 2913 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1054 (1977); Brown v.

CRAWFORD v. OSU MEDICAL TRUST

510 P.3d 824 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 22, 2022

See Fanning v. Brown , 2004 OK 7 85 P.3d 841 Id. III. ANALYSIS A. … Brown v. Jimerson , 1993 OK CIV APP 158 862 P.2d 91 12 O.S. Supp. 1979 §940 A.

Clapp v. Miller

56 Okla. 29 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 29, 1916

See State National Bank v. Mee, 39 Okla. 775 , 136 Pac. 758 . … See Wilson v. Wheeler, 28 Okla. 726 , 115 Pac. 1117 ; Myer v. Church, 11 Okla. 544 , 69 Pac. 874 ; Hatchett v. Hebeisen, 16 Okla. 223 , 82 Pac. 826 ; Anthony Inv. Co. v. Law, 62 Kan. 193 , 61 Pac. 745 ; Knox v.

Opinion No. (2008)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 23, 2008

Laws ch. 2 , § 9; see also part V, below. 3 The term "trade name" has not been defined by the Board of Dentistry in its Administrative Rules. See OAC 195:1-1-1 — 35-1-5. … The Board should consider the promulgation of such rules to provide guidance to the Board and practitioners as to what factors the Board would take into account in determining whether a sign is an advertisement and, if so

Mathews v. State

19 Okla. Crim. 153 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 7, 1921

Brown and indorsed by him to G. C. … Brown, under a power of attorney issued in 1914; and no showing was made that he had ever had an accounting or settlement with Brown; that Brown was a man of upwards of 70 years of age, occupying a rented farm in Texas; that

Gens v. Casady School

177 P.3d 565 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 29, 2008

Washington v. State ex rel. Dept. of Corrections, see note 4, supra. 12 . Fanning v. Brown, 2004 OK 7, ¶ 4 , 85 P.3d 841 ; Indiana Nat’l Bank v. State of Oklahoma Dept. of Human Services, see note 9, supra. 13 . … Fanning v. Brown , see note 12, supra; Frazier v. Bryan Memorial Hosp., 1989 OK 73 , ¶ 13, 775 P.2d 281 .

In re Brown

432 P.2d 358 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 27, 1967

Brown in the State Penitentiary. … See Anderson v. State, Okl.Cr.App., 386 P.2d 320 , citing with approval Ex parte Drake, Cal.App., 233 P.2d 931 .

Cox v. Board of County Commissioners of Kingfisher County

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jul 2, 2020

CIV-20-104-SLP ) BOARD OF COUNTY ) COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY ) … See, e.g., Allen v. Town of Colcord, Okla., 874 F. Supp. 2d 1276, 1290-91 (N.D. Okla. 2012) (setting forth elements).

Fox v. Bynum

432 P.2d 137 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 20, 1967

Petitioner was arrested in Tucson, Arizona by the federal authorities, and was thereafter tried and convicted for said charge. .⅞ He seeks an order of this Court directing the Pardon and Parole Board of Oklahoma to dismiss

YERTON v. CITY OF TULSA

530 P.3d 891 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 14, 2023

YERTON v. … Fanning v. Brown , 2004 OK 7 85 P.3d 841 Id .

Doughty v. State

46 Okla. Crim. 83 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 17, 1930

The defendant next contends that the evidence was inadmissible, for the reason that it was obtained by an illegal search of defendant Brown’s car. … Washington v. State, 37 Okla. Cr. 415 , 259 Pac. 150 ; Callahan v. State, 42 Okla. Cr. 425 , 276 Pac. 494 .

Shephard v. Compsource Oklahoma

209 P.3d 288 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 28, 2009

Manley v. Brown, 1999 OK 79, ¶¶ 23-33 , 989 P.2d 448, 456-58 . … Shephard's claim was examined thereunder, rather than Tate v. Browning-Ferris, Inc., 1992 OK 72 , 833 P.2d 1218 , as argued by the parties below. 7 .