Case law

State of Missouri v. Jeffrey c. McCarty

500 S.W.3d 876 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 4, 2016

See State v. … See United States v.

SUBSCRIBERS AT AUTO. CLUB, ETC. v. Kennison

549 S.W.2d 587 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 22, 1977

Murphy v. Carron, supra, p. 32 . … Prior v. Hager, 440 S.W.2d 167, 172 [1] (Mo.App. 1969). Brown did not appear or testify in the proceedings, but a long hand statement signed by him was introduced into evidence.

Sandusky v. Courtney

168 Mo. App. 325 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 17, 1913

the renting and repairing of her real estate, bought and sold real* estate for her, examined titles, drew deeds and wills, had plat vacated and plat drawn and filed, gave in her property to the assessor, appeared before board … [State ex rel. v. Sullivan County Court, 51 Mo. 522 ; State ex rel. v. Webster, 53 Mo. 135 ; Knox County v. Brown, 103 Mo. l. c. 228; Bank v. Leyser, 116 Mo. l. c. 73; Duff v. Fire Assn., 56 Mo.

EMERALD POINTE, LLC v. TANEY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION and TANEY COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, Defendants-Respondents

Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 8, 2021

Antioch Community Church v. Board of Zoning Adjustment of the City of Kansas City, 543 S.W.3d 28, 33 (Mo. banc 2018); State ex rel. Teefey v. … Cushman Properties, LLC v. Board of Adjustment of City of Branson, 453 S.W.3d 815, 818 (Mo.App. S.D. 2014) (quoting Rice v. Board of Adjustment of Village of Bel-Ridge, 804 S.W.2d 821, 823 (Mo.App. E.D. 1991)).

Frenchie-Westbrook v. Bd. Educ. St. Louis

307 S.W.3d 185 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 23, 2010

Louis City dismissing her petition for judicial review of the Board of Education’s termination decision. The trial court based its dismissal on Ms. … The Board's motion for damages for filing frivolous appeal is denied. The Board also argues that we should dismiss Ms.

Sherman v. Shaughnessy

148 Mo. App. 679 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 31, 1910

Hoge, secretary, and those three persons were named as the first board of directors. ' At a meeting of the company held February 20, 3904, the stockholders voted to increase the board of directors to five, and Jean P. … Co. v. Jefferson, 57 Minn. 456 ; Clark v. Improvement Co., 57 Ind. 135 ; Thrasher v. Railroad, 25 Ill. 393 ; Gettysberg Nat’l Bank v. Brown, 95 Md. 367 .]

Knight v. Mo. Bd. of Prob. & Parole

542 S.W.3d 330 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 21, 2017

State v. Carter , 202 S.W.3d 700 , 706 (Mo. App. W.D. 2006) (quoting State ex rel. Blackwell v. Elrod , 604 S.W.2d 768 , 769 (Mo. App. E.D. 1980) ). … See Frankoviglia v. Centerre Bank of Branson , 791 S.W.2d 7 , 9 (Mo. App.

Bell v. Neukirch

376 F. Supp. 3d 989 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Mar 21, 2019

Winslow v. Smith , 696 F.3d 716 , 730 (8th Cir. 2012) (citing Brown v. City of Golden Valley , 574 F.3d 491 , 495 (8th Cir. 2009) ). … Count III alleges a negligent training claim against the Board, Chief Smith, and Sergeant Ortiz; Count IV alleges a negligent supervision claim against the Board, Chief Smith, and Sergeant Ortiz; and Count V alleges a deprivation

Ronald Luellen v. Special Administrative Board of the Transitional School District of the City of St. Louis

455 S.W.3d 477 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 24, 2015

Loeffelman v. Board of Educ. of Crystal City School Dist., 134 S.W.3d 637, 643 (Mo. App. E.D. 2004). … Williams v. State, Dept. of Social Services, Children’s Div., 440 S.W.3d 425, 435 (Mo. banc 2014).

State v. Littleton

649 S.W.2d 225 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 26, 1983

Neil v. Biggers, 409 U.S. 188, 199 , 93 S.Ct. 375, 382 , 34 L.Ed.2d 401 (1972); State v. Higgins, 592 S.W.2d 151, 160 (Mo. banc 1979). Brown had ample opportunity to view his assailant. … Defendant cites Foster v.

State v. Bartlett

59 L.R.A. 756 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 16, 1902

[State v. Evans, 124 Mo. 397 ; see, also, State v. Hudspeth, 150 Mo. loc. cit. 33, and cas. cited.] … J., in State v. Talmage, 107 Mo. loc. cit. 572, and State v. Hagan, 164 Mo. 654 .]

Mason v. City of Breckenridge Hills

100 S.W.3d 153 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 18, 2003

Brown v. City of O’Fallon, 728 S.W.2d 595, 596 (Mo.App. E.D.1987). On appeal, we review the agency’s decision and not the decision of the circuit court. State ex rel. Hall v. Wolf, 710 S.W.2d 302, 304 (Mo.App. … We presume the correctness of the decision of a city council sitting as a board of impeachment and uphold that decision if it is supported by competent and substantial evidence upon the record as a whole. Fitzgerald v.

Peoples Bank v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

225 Mo. App. 1113 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 5, 1930

[Carroll v. Young, 267 S.W. 436 , 439; Berkshire v. Holcker, 202 Mo. App. 433 , 442, 216 S.W. 556 ; Hart v. Brown, 216 S.W. 552 , 554.] … [Exchange Bank v. Turner, 14 S.W.2d 425 , *Page 1125 432; Luthy v. Ins. Co., 20 S.W.2d 299 ; State ex rel. v. Trimble, 20 S.W.2d 46 ; Carroll v. Ins. Co., 249 S.W. 691 .]

Gill Construction, Inc. v. 18th & Vine Authority

157 S.W.3d 699 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 1, 2005

authority granted to the mayor by the board of aldermen was of record. … In support of its argument that its pleadings against the City were sufficient, Gill cites Browning v. Salem Memorial District Hospital, 808 S.W.2d 943 (Mo.App. S.D.1991).

Ianke v. Ianke (In Re Ianke)

185 B.R. 297 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 12, 1995

The Debtor agreed to “pay to John Brown, Attorney for Petitioner, the sum of $1,375.00 ...” Separation Agreement, para. I. … Brown, Plaintiff, in Count I and Count II of this Adversary Complaint, to determine that the Defendant’s obligation to pay to John P.

Cavallaro v. Denney

350 S.W.3d 839 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 13, 2011

Vincent Cavallaro appeals the trial court’s summary judgment in favor of the Missouri Board of Probation and Parole, denying his claim that he was entitled to parole or conditional release from prison.

City of Lee's Summit v. Browning

722 S.W.2d 114 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 23, 1986

Rosenblum v. Gibbons, 685 S.W.2d 924, 927 (Mo.App.1984); Oldham’s Farm Sausage Co. v. Salco, Inc., 633 S.W.2d 177,182 (Mo.App.1982). … The Brownings’ failure to argue the nuisance issue leaves that issue as' an independent basis for affirmance. May Dept. Stores Co. v. County of St. Louis, 607 S.W.2d 857, 868-69 (Mo.App.1980).

Atlantic National Bank v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.

357 Mo. 770 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 12, 1948

Sims- v. Brown, 252 Mo. 58 , - 158 S. W. 624 . … Brown, supra; defendant relies on such cases as Wimpey v. Ledford, (Mo.) 177 S. W. 302 , Thorp v. Daniel, 339 Mo. 763 , 99 S. W. (2d) 42 ; Davis v. Rossi, 326 Mo. 911 , 34 S. W. (2d) 8 , Trautz v.

In re Kansas City Stone, etc., Co.

14 F. Cas. 128 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jul 1, 1873

Chouquette v. Barada, 33 Mo. 249 ; Koehler v. Black River Falls Iron Co., 2 Black [67 U. S.] 715. … The doctrine here stated is fully discussed in Bird v. Brown, 4 Welsb. H. & G. 786.

Byers Bros. Real Estate & Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Campbell

353 S.W.2d 102 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 4, 1961

Shaltupsky v. Brown Shoe Co., 350 Mo. 831 , 168 S.W.2d 1083 ; Seegers v. Marx & Haas Clothing Co., 334 Mo. 632 , 66 S.W.2d 526 . … Shaltupsky v. Brown Shoe Co., supra; Medich v. Stippec, 335 Mo. 796 , 73 S.W.2d 998 ; Seegers v. Marx & Haas Clothing Co., supra; Kansas City v. Rathford, 353 Mo. 1130 , 186 S.W.2d 570 .