Case law

Central Railroad v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

112 N.J.L. 215 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 26, 1934

Justice Parker, in the case of Atlantic City Railroad v. Pleasantville, 99 N. J. L. 328; affirmed (Court of Errors and Appeals), 100 N. J. … So much of the orders of the state board as passed upon the facts involved in the petitions are approved and confirmed, and the board is directed to issue its orders in accordance therewith. (Dissenting opinion by Mr.

Butterfoss v. State ex rel. Board of Health

40 N.J. Eq. 325 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1885

Hackensack Water Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

100 N.J.L. 177 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 17, 1924

Remington Cash Register Co. v. State Board of Taxes

8 N.J. Misc. 875 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 22, 1930

Upon appeal, the county board of taxation, and the state board of taxes and assessment, affirmed the assesment. … It was urged before such boards, and here, that the sales, being conditional, the title was in the vendee subject to being divested for non-payment of the installments of consideration and that the transactions were analogous

State Board of Medical Examiners v. De Young

4 N.J. Misc. 75 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 1, 1926

This is an appeal from a conviction under the statute relating to the practice of medicine without a license, and the appeal will be dismissed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the per curiam of this court in State Board … v.

Rachel A. Parsons v. Mullica Township Board of Education(075859)

226 N.J. 297 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 17, 2016

Parsons v. Mullica Township Board of Education (A-69-14) (075859) Argued April 12, 2016 -- Decided August 17, 2016 FERNDANDEZ-VINA J., writing for a unanimous Court. … State v.

Titan Sports, Inc. v. State Athletic Control Board

11 N.J. Tax 259 · New Jersey Tax Court · Aug 17, 1990

The board distinguishes cases granting First Amendment protection to other forms of entertainment, e.g., Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. … The board denies that New Jersey lacks substantial nexus with the interstate communications and relies on Goldberg v.

Denise Brown v. State of New Jersey (076656) (Cumberland County and Statewide)

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 25, 2017

In Re Atlantic County Bd. of Elections

117 N.J. Super. 244 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 2, 1971

Brown and Mrs. Haynie met. Dunbar nominated himself for membership on the County Board of Elections and Mrs. Haynie nominated Mrs. Mooney. Thereupon Dunbar voted for himself as did Mrs. Brown. Mrs. Haynie voted for Mrs. … In Wene v.

City of Atlantic City v. Board of Commissioners

138 N.J. Super. 595 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 5, 1976

On December 4, 1969 the board of commissioners enacted Ordinance No. 38 of 1969, providing that the salaries of the mayor and board of commissioners should be $21,000 and $18,500, respectively. … Giles v. Gassert, 23 N. J. 22, 33-34 (1956).

L.W. v. Toms River Regional Schools Board of Education

381 N.J. Super. 465 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 7, 2005

See Frugis v. … See Catalane v.

General Motors Corp. v. State Board of Tax Appeals

125 N.J.L. 574 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 12, 1940

Central Railroad of New Jersey v. Stale Tax Department, 112 N. J. L. 5, 8. The taxpayer had the burden of overcoming this presumption and certain witnesses were called at the hearing before the State Tax Board. … Compare Hurd v. Cook, 60 N. J. L. 70; Gibbs v. State Board, 101 Id. 371. As to the other two items of personalty, namely, new cars on hand and accounts receivable, there is no dispute.

Kadetsky v. Egg Harbor Township Board of Education

164 F. Supp. 2d 425 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 10, 2001

See Kadetsky v. … Co. v.

UNDERWOOD PROPERTIES, LLC VS. PLANNING BOARD OF THE CITY OF HACKENSACK (L-7889-17, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 17, 2020

A-5420-18T3 UNDERWOOD PROPERTIES, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PLANNING BOARD OF THE CITY OF HACKENSACK and 22 W. … In Neu v.

Borough of Emerson v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment

6 N.J. Misc. 326 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 22, 1928

The assessor filed an appeal with the county board of taxation requesting a reinstatement of the $150,000 assessment, struck out by the board against iCbuildings and other improvements.” … Erom this action of the board the water company appealed to the state board of taxes and assessments, and that board canceled the assessment of $150,000.

Borough of Haworth v. State Board of Tax Appeals

132 N.J.L. 306 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 8, 1945

State Board of Tax Appeals, 122 N. J. A. 596. So also assessments for the years 1938 and 1939 in Haworth v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 121 Id. 61. Mr. … Woodcliff Lake v. State Board of Tax Appeals and Hackensack Water Co., 14 N. J. Mis. R. 132; affirmed, 117 N. J. L. 114. The inventory value of automobile parts as evidence of value (General Motors Corp. v.

Mary Richter v. Oakland Board of Education (083273)

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 8, 2021

Mary Richter v. Oakland Board of Education (A-23-19) (083273) Argued September 14, 2020 -- Decided June 8, 2021 LaVECCHIA, J., writing for a unanimous Court. … In Victor v.

City of Newark v. Essex County Board

114 N.J. 301 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 7, 1988

In re Plan for the Abolition of the Council on Affordable Housing

214 N.J. 444 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 10, 2013

The panel recognized that this Court upheld the constitutionality of the Reorganization Act in Brown v. Heymann, 62 N.J. 1 , 297 A.2d 572 (1972). … We therefore have no reason to reassess Brown today. Brown , of course, upheld the constitutionality of the Reorganization Act in 1972. Brown, supra, 62 N.J. at 5 , 297 A.2d 572 .

Darcy J. Kolodziej v. Board of Education of Southern

436 N.J. Super. 546 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 25, 2014

Kletzkin v. Bd. of Educ., 136 N.J. 275, 279 (1994) (quoting Bd. of Educ. v. Wall, 119 N.J.L. 308, 309-10 (Sup. Ct. 1938)). … Ibid.; see also Ward v.