Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.89s
Heartland Plymouth Court MI, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board
650 F. App'x 11 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 3, 2016
Ctr. v. NLRB, 433 F.3d 834, 835 (2005). … Nuclear Operating Co. v. NLRB, 524 F.3d 1350, 1358 (D.C. Cir. *13 2008); NLRB v. U.S. Postal Serv., 8 F.3d 832, 836 (D.C. Cir. 1993).
Cited 0 timesPublishedNational Council of American-Soviet Friendship, Inc. v. Subversive Activities Control Board
301 F.2d 518 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 10, 1962
Counsel having appeared before this court for a prehearing conference, and it appearing that counsel for petitioner asserts that numerous alleged findings of fact included in the Report and Order of the Board here under review … are without the support of substantial evidence in the record as a whole; and it further appearing that the Board in response insists that all its findings are fully supported by substantial evidence in the record; and it
Cited 2 timesPublished335 F.2d 709 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 25, 1964
See Labor Board v. Mexia Textile Mills, 339 U. S. 563, 567 , 70 S.Ct. 833 , 94 L.Ed. 1067 (1950), and cases there cited. To the extent that the Board decree is so designed, it will be enforced. V. … Member Brown of the Board, who relied on Retail Clerks Union Local 770 v. N.L.R.B., supra Note 8, dissented from the Board’s decision that the provision here involved violated § 8(e).
Cited 4 timesPublishedWeldon, Williams & Lick, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
255 F. App'x 535 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 21, 2007
The petition for review and cross-application for enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board was considered on the briefs and oral arguments of counsel. … Conair Corp. v. NLRB, 721 F.2d 1355, 1368 (D.C.Cir.1983) (internal quotation marks omitted).
Cited 0 timesPublished235 F.2d 845 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 19, 1956
TRANS WORLD AIRLINES, Inc., Petitioner, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Respondent. EASTERN AIR LINES, Inc., Petitioner, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Respondent. PAN AMERICAN WORLD AIRWAYS, Inc., Petitioner, v. … CONTINENTAL AIR LINES, Inc., Petitioner, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Respondent. NORTHWEST AIR LINES, Inc., Petitioner, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Respondent. ALLEGHENY AIRLINES, Inc., et al., Petitioners, v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedEmbassy of the People's Republic of Benin v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment
534 A.2d 310 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 30, 1987
See Kopff v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, 381 A.2d 1372, 1384 (D.C.1977). 9 . … Board of Zoning Appeals, 126 Conn. 648, 650-54 , 13 A.2d 675, 676-77 (1940); Scott v. Minnix, 95 Ga.App. 589, 590 , 98 S.E.2d 196, 197 (1957); Balsam v. Jagger, 231 N.Y.S.2d 450 , 452 (Sup.Ct.1962); Scott v.
Cited 11 timesPublished559 F. Supp. 1337 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 28, 1983
The resolution did not result from any philosophical divergence but, rather, was adopted primarily as a countermeasure to “massive resistance” to their efforts to enforce compliance with Brown v. … Board of Educ., 611 F.2d 624 , 637 (6th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 911 , 100 S.Ct. 2999 , 64 L.Ed.2d 862 (1980); NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. v. Campbell, 504 F.Supp. 1365, 1368 (D.D.C.1981).
Reversed on other grounds by National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, AKA Naacp v. N.A.A.C.P. Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc., 753 F.2d 131 (1985)Cited 8 timesPublishedRetail Store Employees Union Local 954 v. Rothman
298 F.2d 330 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 11, 1962
Brown, Jr., National Labor Relations Board, with whom Messrs. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Boad, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. … Natinal Labor Relations Board, 91 U.S.App.D.C. 316 , 201 F.2d 187 (1952), and in Bandlow v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedUnited Electrical Contractors Ass'n v. National Labor Relations Board
258 F. App'x 331 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 27, 2007
Agents’ Int’l Union, 361 U.S. 477, 488 , 80 S.Ct. 419 , 4 L.Ed.2d 454 (1960), and this court gives deference to the Board’s determination, which is “largely a matter for the Board’s expertise.” NLRB v. … Scepter, Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedPhyllis F. Borrell v. United States International Communications Agency
682 F.2d 981 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 22, 1982
See also Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281 , 99 S.Ct. 1705 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979); Santa Clara Pueblo v. Martinez, 436 U.S. 49 , 98 S.Ct. 1670 , 56 L.Ed.2d 106 (1978); Piper v. … See Wren v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 618 F.2d 867, at 873 (D.C.Cir.1982) (hereinafter Wren).
Declined to follow by Pinar v. Dole, 747 F.2d 899 (1984)Cited 79 timesPublished363 F.2d 702 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 15, 1966
V. The Board ordered the Company to reinstate four employees it found to have been discharged to discourage union membership. The Company disputes the findings as to each. … See Local 152 v. NLRB, 120 U.S.App.D.C. 25, 27 , 343 F.2d 307 , 309 (1965); NLRB v. Delight Bakery, Inc., 353 F.2d 344, 347 (6th Cir. 1965).
Cited 20 timesPublishedUnited States Postal Service v. National Labor Relations Board
969 F.2d 1064 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 30, 1992
In ruling on the cross-application, we have authority to consider the responding party's objections to the Board's decision. 4 See Ford Motor Co. v. … We have no warrant on the facts before us to declare the Board's relief order excessive. See Virginia Elec. & Power Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublished466 F.2d 345 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 6, 1972
466 F.2d 345 151 U.S.App.D.C. 174 BANERCRAFT CLOTHING COMPANY, Inc. v. The RENEGOTIATION BOARD, Appellant. ASTRO COMMUNICATION LABORATORY, A Division of Aiken Industries, Inc. v. The RENEGOTIATION BOARD, Appellant. … Renegotiation Board, the District Judge ordered production of the documents for in camera inspection so he could evaluate the force of the Board's arguments. Cf. Soucie v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedGreater Washington Board of Trade v. District of Columbia and Sharon Pratt Dixon
948 F.2d 1317 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 10, 1992
WALD, Circuit Judge: Appellant Greater Washington Board of Trade (“Board”) is a nonprofit corporation that provides health insurance to its employees. … On March 27, 1991, the district court granted appellees’ motion to dismiss and denied the Board’s motion for a preliminary injunction. See Greater Wash. Bd. of Trade v. District of Columbia, No. 91-00511 (D.D.C.
Cited 11 timesPublishedAmerican Association of Marriage and Family Counselors Inc. v. Harold Brown, Secretary of Defense
593 F.2d 1365 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 21, 1979
American Association of Marriage and Family Counselors, Inc. v. Brown, 440 F.Supp. 1114 (D.D.C.1977). This appeal followed. B. … In NTEU v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedGo Leasing, Inc. v. National Transportation Safety Board, Engen (Donald D.)
839 F.2d 824 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 22, 1988
839 F.2d 824 268 U.S.App.D.C. 145 Go Leasing, Inc. v. National Transportation Safety Board, Engen (Donald D.) NO. 87-1284 United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Cited 0 timesPublishedShinabargar v. Board of Trustees of the University of the District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 4, 2015
a motion to dismiss (“Motion”) filed by Defendants Board of 16 Trustees of The University of The District of Columbia (“UDC”), Katherine S. … See Goldlawr, Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedAir Alliance Houston v. U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board
District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 4, 2019
Circuit’s decision in Friends of Animals v. Jewell also contradicts the Board’s excessively narrow view of informational standing. See 824 F.3d 1033 (D.C. Cir. 2016). … In AARP v. U.S.
Cited 0 timesPublishedInternational Union of Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers v. National Labor Relations Board
426 F.2d 1243 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 3, 1970
There is a presumption that favors the Board, with its expertise, in its selection of remedies. Fibreboard Paper Prods. Corp. v. N.L.R.B., supra. See also Consolo v. … Corp. v. N.L.R.B., supra,; N.L.R.B. v. Mooney Aircraft, Inc., supra. The Union has asked for remand to the Board for further consideration of the make-whole claim (while the remainder of the Board’s order is enforced).
Cited 7 timesPublishedThomas Carswell v. J.J. Parker, Warden, U.S. Penitentiary and U.S. Parole Board
385 F.2d 645 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 24, 1967
It is conceded that the Board’s warrant was issued and executed promptly after the facts constituting the violation came to the Board’s attention and at a time when the Board had statutory power to act. Birch v. … Citing such cases as Anderson v. Corall, 263 U.S. 193 , 44 S.Ct. 43 , 68 L.Ed. 247 (1923), and Zerbst v.
Cited 4 timesPublished
Ask Donna