Case law

State v. Thompson

57 Or. App. 281 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 12, 1982

In Brown v. Multnomah County Dist. … Iannelli v. United States, 420 U.S. 770 , 785 n. 17 [ 95 S.Ct. 1284 , 43 L.Ed.2d 616 ] (1975)." Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161, 166 , 97 S.Ct. 2221 , 53 L.Ed.2d 187 (1977).

Walker v. State

256 Or. App. 697 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 22, 2013

Brown, 310 Or 347, 355-56 , 800 P2d 259 (1990), and Ailes . The parties’ mutual, threshold assumption in that regard is incorrect. … Until the post-conviction court issued its judgment, petitioner had no reason to know that it would not include findings comporting with ORS 138.640(1). 1 Thus, the issue on appeal, uncomplicated by reference to Brown or

In Re Brown

198 Or. App. 533 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 16, 2005

App. 533 IN RE BROWN STATE v. BROWN Court of Appeals of Oregon March 16, 2005 Affirmed without opinion.

SAIF Corp. v. Owens

247 Or. App. 402 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 29, 2011

In Hicks v. … Libbett v.

Kroner v. City of Portland

116 Or. 141 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 14, 1925

Residen *148 tial District: For single and two family dwellings, fiats, apartment houses, boarding-houses, hotels, multiple dwellings and the like. Class II. … Bean, Brown, Coshow and Belt, JJ., concur.

State v. Walters

105 Or. 662 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 26, 1922

Finding this place “locked up,” Palmer suggested that he and Thorpe board a street-car “and go around on the street-ear.” Thorpe and Palmer entered a street-car, and the patrol-wagon “went back.” … Brown, J., not sitting.

Evans v. Schrunk

4 Or. App. 437 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 28, 1971

The circuit court correctly tried the Writ on the record made by and brought from the Board. See Wing v. City of Eugene, 249 Or 367, 371 , 437 P2d 836 (1968). … Schrunk, 242 Or 196 , 409 P2d 177 (1965); Hicks v. Schrunk, 238 Or 181 , 393 P2d 771 (1964); Miller v. Schrunk et al, 232 Or 383 , 375 P2d 823 (1962); City of Portland v.

No Special Rights Committee v. Keisling

312 Or. 459 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 12, 1991

ORS 250.085(2). 2 Brown v. Roberts, 309 Or 667, 669 , 791 P2d 488 (1990). We, therefore, dismiss the petition as to the committee. We also dismiss the petition as to Mabon. … Brown v. Roberts, supra, 309 Or at 669 . *462 Petition to review ballot title dismissed.

Delaney v. Taco Time International, Inc.

297 Or. 10 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 24, 1984

In Brown v. Transcon Lines, 284 Or 597 , 588 P2d 1087 (1978), the plaintiff filed a workers’ compensation claim and was discharged for so doing. … In Brown , plaintiff was entitled to a wrongful discharge remedy and in Campbell , plaintiff was not. What is the difference? The statutory right pursued in Brown related directly to the plaintiffs role as an employee.

Hogg v. Davis

22 Or. 428 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 18, 1892

It is alleged that said lots 1, 2, and 8 were filed upon and claimed June 16, 1869, by one Daniel Brown, under the homestead laws of the United States; that a final homestead certificate was issued to Brown on April 1, 1875 … , and that a patent was issued on such certificate to Brown on the first day of the following June; that whatever right Brown acquired under these proceedings and patents, passed by mesne conveyances to the defendant; that

Godinez v. SAIF Corp.

269 Or. App. 578 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 11, 2015

See Gienger v. … Gafur v. Legacy Good Samaritan Hospital, 344 Or 525, 533 , 185 P3d 446 (2008).

Johnson v. Underwood

102 Or. 680 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 24, 1922

BROWN, J. 1. Appellant’s assignments numbered 1, 2 and 3, involving a motion for nonsuit, for a directed verdict, and a requested instruction, cover the same ground, thus presenting but one question. … On redirect examination of Irvin, he was asked: “ * * I will ask you to look at this picture, for instance; here is the running-board, which appears to be stove in, in a way; would that necessarily indicate that that running-board

Re Determination of Water Rights of Hood River.

114 Or. 112 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 6, 1923

At the hearing before the Water Board Mr. … Burnett, Brown and McCourt, JJ., dissent in special opinions.

State v. Hauskins

251 Or. App. 34 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 5, 2012

See Rondeau v. Board of Parole, 232 Or App 488, 491 , 222 P3d 753 (2009); see also State v. Gibbens, 25 Or App 185, 187-88 , 548 P2d 523 (1976). … ORS 33.105(2); see also Brown v. Multnomah County Dist. Ct., 280 Or 95, 103 , 570 P2d 52 (1977) (punitive confinement for an act indicates the act is a crime).

Simi v. LTI Inc. - Lynden Inc.

300 Or. App. 258 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 30, 2019

Hunter v. … See Smirnoff v.

Cascade Bargaining Council v. Jefferson County School District No. 509-J

83 Or. App. 418 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 28, 1987

Petitioner seeks judicial review of a decision of the Employment Relations Board (ERB) that found that petitioner had committed an unfair labor practice by failing to sign a collective bargaining agreement incorporating the … Whatever else that provision may mean, see, e.g., Brown v.

State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. Maddox

295 Or. 448 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 2, 1983

“February 19,1980: Court of Appeals affirms (without opinion) the Board’s order in compensability case. Maddox v. SAIF, 44 Or App 520 , 605 P2d 1391 (1980). … “March 9,1981: Court of Appeals remands compensability case to Board. Maddox v. SAIF, 51 Or App 2 , 624 P2d 643 (1981). *451 “December 7,1981: Board on remand holds claim not compensable.

SAIF Corp. v. Sprague

346 Or. 661 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 27, 2009

Sprague v. … SAIF v. Sprague, 221 Or App 413 , 190 P3d 443 (2008) (Sprague III). The majority concluded that the board had complied with the remand instructions and affirmed the board’s decision.

Johnston v. Leach

197 Or. 430 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 26, 1953

We accept, and will apply the general views as to the nature of gross negligence expressed in Bauch v. Stecklein; Boss v. Hayes; Callander and Stone v. Brown; and Baird v. Boyer, all supra. … Herzog v. Mittleman, supra.

Burnett v. Lampert

173 Or. App. 577 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 25, 2001

As we noted in Weidner v. Armenakis, 154 Or App 12, 18 , 959 P2d 623 (1998), withdrawn by order July 13, 1998, reasoning reaffirmed and readopted in Merrill v. … See Bagby v.