Case law

Chapman v. Board of County Commissioners of Oklahoma County

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Oct 12, 2021

Comm'rs of Bryan Cty., Okl. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 (1997). Instead, a plaintiff must show that “through its deliberate conduct, the municipality was the ‘moving force’ behind the injury alleged.” Id. … See Brown, 520 U.S. at 409. In Waller v.

Hoyt v. Cordell

197 Okla. 386 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 19, 1946

Latting, Petitioner, v. J. Wm. Cordell, Secretary of the State Election Board, et al., 197 Okla. 369 , 172 P. 2d 397 , the only difference being that the above cases involve offices in Oklahoma county. … Cordell, Secretary of the State Election Board of Oklahoma, et al., respondents, to require respondents to cause the name of each petitioner to be printed upon the official ballot-s for the general election to be held in

Bd. of Regents, Etc. v. Natl. Collegiate Athletic Ass'n

561 P.2d 499 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 1, 1977

In State Board of Public Affairs v. … See United States v. National Association of Real Estate Boards, 339 U.S. 485, 489 , 70 S.Ct. 711 , 94 L.Ed. 1007 (1950); United States v.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Ackerman, Hood & McQueen, Inc.

758 F. Supp. 1440 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Feb 20, 1991

See, e.g., Brown v. Parker-Hannifin Corp., 746 F.2d 1407, 1409 (10th Cir.1984) (claim of discharge based upon national origin). 8 . … Loeb v. Textron, Inc., 600 F.2d 1003, 1014 (1st Cir.1979). 12 . Brown, 746 F.2d at 1409 -10 (citing Crawford v. Northeastern Okla. State Univ., 713 F.2d 586, 588 (10th Cir.1983)).

Fehring v. State Insurance Fund

72 O.B.A.J. 545 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 6, 2001

Manley v. Brown, 1999 OK 79 , ¶ 22 f.n. 30, 989 P.2d 448 . Here, de novo review shows no material disputed facts precluding summary judgment in favor of SIF. PART II. … Houston v.

Chapman v. Board of County Commissioners of Oklahoma County

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jul 30, 2021

United States v. Kordel, 397 U.S. 1, 12 n. 27 (1970). … Berreth v. Frazee, No. 19-CV- 00027-PAB-KMT, 2019 WL 10250759, at *2 (D. Colo. Apr. 1, 2019); Hilda M. v. Brown, No. 10-CV-02495-PAB-KMT, 2010 WL 5313755, at *3 (D. Colo.

Benadum v. Armstrong

44 Okla. 637 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 26, 1915

Goat et al. v. United States, supra [ 224 U. S. 458 , 32 Sup. Ct. 544, 56 L. Ed. 841 ]; Godfrey v. Iowa Land & Trust Co., 21 Okla. 293 , 95 Pac. 792 ; McWilliams Inv. Co. v. … Also in the case of Thraves v.

Page v. Atkins

86 Okla. 290 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 25, 1922

Hutchinson v. Pratt, 11 Vt. 402 ; People v. Zeyst, 23 N. Y. 140 ; Gaither v. Tax Collector, 40 La. Ann. 362 . … In Vary v.

Kelly v. Watkins

135 Okla. 276 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 16, 1928

In the case of Cravens v. … Walker v. Brown, 43 Okla. 144 , 141 Pac. 681 .” The case of Wrigley v. McCoy, 73 Okla. 161 , 175 Pac. 259 , was an action in ejectment, for cancellation of instruments and for rents and profits.

State v. M.A.L.

765 P.2d 787 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 23, 1988

Sonnier v. State, 597 P.2d 771 (Okla.Crim.App.1979). This assignment of error is without merit. … Lee v. State, 561 P.2d 566, 569 (Okla.Crim.App.1977). This is true because confessions by juveniles are more suspect than those of adults. J.D. and D.R.D. v. State, 558 P.2d 402, 405 (Okla.Crim.App.1976).

Frazier v. State

654 P.2d 639 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 16, 1982

Brown, failed to investigate and explore all avenues leading to facts relevant to guilt and degree of guilt, as would a reasonably competent attorney. In our recent decision of Smith v. … Brown acted in a reasonably competent manner, under the peculiar circumstances presented in this case, sufficient to meet our standards in Johnson v. State, 620 P.2d 1311 (Okl.Cr.1980), or in Eide v.

IN THE MATTER OF J.J.P.

408 P.3d 218 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 1, 2017

Ryan Brown, examined him. When Dr. Brown asked J.L.P. how he got the scratch, J.L.P. again disclosed that Mother hit him with her cell phone and used Dr. Brown’s cell phone to demonstrate. Dr. … Drouillard v. Jensen Const.

STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. NACHIMSON

2017 OK 4 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 17, 2017

OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. … Brown Grievance Hester Brown alleges that Respondent failed to earn attorney fees entrusted to him, failed to timely file an appeal in Ms. Brown's legal matter, and that Respondent wrote Ms.

STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. AUER

376 P.3d 243 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 28, 2016

OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. … Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v.

SHADID v. K 9 UNIVERSITY LLC

2017 OK CIV APP 45 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 1, 2017

See Fanning v. Brown , 2004 OK 7, ¶ 4 , 85 P.3d 841 . The court must take as true all of the challenged pleading's allegations together with all reasonable inferences which may be drawn from them. Id. … Discussed 1997 OK 101 , 943 P.2d 625 , 68 OBJ 2542, NICKELL v. SUMNER Discussed 2004 OK 7 , 85 P.3d 841 , FANNING v. BROWN Discussed 2009 OK 20 , 206 P.3d 599 , WELCH v.

Taylor v. State

14 Okla. Crim. 400 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 30, 1918

Cr. 389 , 119 Pac, 136 ; Penn v. State, 13 Okla. Cr. 367 , 164 Pac. 992 , L. R. A. 1917E, 668; Morris v. State, 9 Okla. Cr. 241 , 131 Pac. 731 . … Brown had known the prosecuting witness from the time-of her birth, and testified that when the prosecuting witness was one month old, her mother brought the child to Mrs. Brown’s house on a visit.

Liberty National Bank & Trust Company of Oklahoma City v. Kaibab Industries, Inc.

591 P.2d 692 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 19, 1978

American-First Title & Trust Company v. Ewing, Okl, 403 P.2d 488 (1965). See also Thompson v. Smith, Okl, 420 P.2d 526 (1966). … Brown, d/b/a Brown Plumbing Company, W & W Painting & Drywall, Inc., Stanley R. Meuller, and Ed Herbert, d/b/a Adventurer Manufacturing Co. 2 . Antrim Lumber Co. v. Claremore Federal S. & L.

Short v. State

70 O.B.A.J. 1223 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 14, 1999

Testifying in the State’s case-in-chief, Brown testified that Appellant said he thought he knew Brown, a fact which Brown denied, and proceeded to tell Brown that he was in jail for firebombing an apartment complex. … Substantial evidence, other than Brown’s testimony, placed Appellant at the scene of the crime. Cf. Smith v.

City of Oklahoma City v. Hill

4 Okla. 521 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 4, 1896

(Campbell v. Coonradt, 22 Kan. 704 ; Conaway v. Gore, 27 Kan. 127 ; Burdette v. Corgan, 18 Kan. 275 ; Buettinger v. Hurley, ante, 197, just decided; Emsley v. Bennett, 35 Iowa 15 .”) … This doctrine obtains in the state of Nebraska, under a statute similar to ours. ' There, in the case of Brown v.

Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Dempsey

105 Okla. 221 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 30, 1924

Co. v. Duran, 38 Okla. 719 , 134 Pac. 876 , and cases therein cited; Dakey v. North McAlester Coal Co., 98 Okla. 130 , 224 Pac. 309 . … Smith v. Acme Milling Co., 34 Okla. 439 , 126 Pac. 191 .