Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.37s
Municipal Council v. Essex County Board of Elections
259 N.J. Super. 211 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 16, 1992
In opposition, Newark cites the case of Polillo v. … This court finds that the facts of the present case are analogous to those of Precision, supra, where the Appellate Division viewed and interpreted the Supreme Court’s opinion in Polillo v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedErie Railroad v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners
90 N.J.L. 672 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 11, 1917
Cited 3 timesPublishedEI PROPERTIES, INC. VS. THE TOWNSHIP OF NEPTUNE (L-3009-16, MONMOUTH COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 3, 2019
Ten Stary Dom P'ship v. Mauro, 216 N.J. 16, 33 (2013) (citations omitted) (first citing Smart SMR of N.Y., Inc. v. Fair Lawn Bd. of Adjustment, 152 N.J. 309, 327 (1998); then citing Leimann v. … In that regard, the Zoning Board had received the views of its planning expert. The Zoning Board was also free to reject the contrary testimony given by plaintiffs' licensed planners. See Klug v. Bridgewater Twp.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedJames Construction Co. v. Board of Public Utilities
298 N.J. Super. 355 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 6, 1997
V, or a “criminal offense.” N.J. Const, art. I, f 8; see also Baldwin v. New York, 399 U.S. 66 , 90 S.Ct. 1886 , 26 L.Ed.2d 437 (1970); Duncan v. … See David v. Vesta Co., 45 N.J. 301, 326-27 , 212 A.2d 345 (1965). The Board has the authority both to investigate UFPA violations and to assess civil penalties thereof.
Cited 1 timesPublishedBorough of Oradell v. State Board of Tax Appeals
125 N.J.L. 37 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 21, 1940
See, also, Wheeler and Wilson Manufacturing Co. v. Carty, 53 N. J. L. 336. The cases of Shrewsbury v. Merchants' Steamboat Co., 76 N. J. L. 407, relied upon by the Supreme Court, and Mellor v. … Justice Reed dealt thus with the question in Williamson v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedWashington Township v. Burlington County Board of Taxation
7 N.J. Tax 1 · New Jersey Tax Court · Sep 7, 1984
Where a county board has utilized the director’s school aid table and applied it uniformly a presumption of validity attaches to a county board’s determination in its adoption of an equalization table. Kearney v. … In Secaucus v. Taxation Div.
Cited 1 timesPublishedHolden v. Board of Education of City of Elizabeth
46 N.J. 281 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 24, 1966
State Board of Education, 303 U. S. 624 [ 58 S. Ct. 752 , 82 L. Ed. 1087 ] (1938); Gabrielli v. Knickerbocker, et al., 306 U. S. 621 [ 59 S. Ct. 786 , 83 L. Ed. 1026 ] (1939), a summary decision in Johnson, et al. v. … The Supreme Court in West Virginia Board of Education v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedState ex rel. Board of Health v. White
90 N.J. Eq. 621 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 15, 1919
Cited 1 timesPublishedLowrie v. State Board of Registration & Examination in Dentistry
90 N.J.L. 54 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 21, 1917
White v. Neptune City, 56 N. J. L. 222; Board of Health v. Cattell, 73 Id. 516; Tenement House Board v. Gruber, 79 Id. 257. … Freeman v. United States, 217 U. S. 539 . The report of this case in 19 Ann. Cos. 755 has a valuable note collecting the authorities.
Cited 6 timesPublishedCooperman v. BOARD OF EDUC. OF HILLSIDE TP.
577 F. Supp. 52 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jan 21, 1983
That case, while noting that Brown v. … v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedHeintze v. New Jersey State Board of Medical Examiners
107 N.J.L. 420 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 21, 1931
Lowrie v. Board, 90 N. J. L. 54; State Board *422 v. Giedroyc, 91 Id. 61; State Board v. O’Neill, 6 N. J. Mis. R. 1075; 143 Atl. Rep. 814 . … State Board v. Buettel, 102 N. J. L. 74. Reasons 8, 9 and 17 assert that the act is an unreasonable exercise of the police power. Our view, and we think that of courts generally, is to the contrary.
Cited 2 timesPublishedArimex Consolidated Copper Co. v. State Board of Assessors
69 N.J.L. 121 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 24, 1903
In the year 1900 the state board of assessors assessed the franchise tax of the prosecutor, under the Corporation Tax act of April 18th, 1894 (Gen. … While the Corporation Tax act requires each corporation to furnish to the board an annual return of such information as the board may desire to carry out the law, it does not make that return the legal basis of the tax.
Cited 4 timesPublishedSchool District of Wildwood v. State Board of Education
116 N.J.L. 572 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 1, 1936
board of education of Wildwood in dismissing two tenure teachers upon the sole ground that they were married women, and directing their reinstatement. … We agree with the decision of the commissioner and of the board.
Cited 7 timesPublishedCentral Railroad v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners
112 N.J.L. 559 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 26, 1934
Cited 1 timesPublishedButterfoss v. State ex rel. Board of Health
40 N.J. Eq. 325 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1885
Cited 1 timesPublishedErie Railroad v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners
90 N.J.L. 271 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 5, 1917
before the board to support reasonably such order, or that the same was without the jurisdiction of the board." … Public Service Gas Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners, 81 N. J.
Cited 1 timesPublishedDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 28, 2025
□ (“HSBC” or “Defendant”) Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 7) Plaintiff Mary Reinhold Brown’s (“Plaintiff’) Complaint (ECF No. 1-1). Plaintiff opposed (ECF No. 10), and Defendant replied (ECF No. 11). … Four of the possibilities require the “satisfaction” or “approval” of the board of directors. (See id. § 5.2.1(i)-(ii), (v)-(vi).)
Cited 0 timesUnknownHackensack Water Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners
98 N.J.L. 41 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 7, 1922
Public Service Co. v. Public Utility Board, 84 N. J. L. 463; affirmed, 87 Id. 705; Eliza *43 bethtown Gas Light Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commis sioners, 95 Id. 18. … The board relies upon the recent decision of the United States Supreme Court in Galveston Electric Co. v. Galveston, 42 Sup. Ct. Rep. 351, but this view of the effect of that decision seems erroneous. Mr.
Overruled by New Jersey Power & Light Co. v. State of New Jersey Department of Public Utilities, 15 N.J. 82 (1954)Cited 6 timesPublishedBoard of Public Utility Com'rs v. United States
21 F. Supp. 543 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 17, 1937
Co. v. United States], 234 U.S. 342, 351, 354, 355 , 34 S.Ct. 833 , 58 L.Ed. 1341 ; Railroad Commission of Wisconsin v. Chicago, B. & Q. R. … Interstate Commerce Comm. v. Louisville & Nashville R. Co., 227 U.S. 88, 100 , 33 S.Ct. 185 , 57 L.Ed. 431 ; Western Paper Makers’ Chemical Co. v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedErie Railroad v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners
85 N.J.L. 420 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 24, 1914
Public Service Gas Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners, 55 Vroom. 463. … Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Rail *423 road Co. v. Public Utility Commissioners, 54 Vroom 212 .
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna