Case law

Phyllis F. Borrell v. United States International Communications Agency

682 F.2d 981 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 22, 1982

See also Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281 , 99 S.Ct. 1705 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979); Santa Clara Pueblo v. Martinez, 436 U.S. 49 , 98 S.Ct. 1670 , 56 L.Ed.2d 106 (1978); Piper v. … See Wren v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 618 F.2d 867, at 873 (D.C.Cir.1982) (hereinafter Wren).

Harkness v. District of Columbia

8 D.C. 121 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 15, 1873

aforesaid; that plaintiffs have not paid said assessment, and that certificates of indebtedness have been prepared by the board and will be issued, and that it is the design of said board to negotiate the same and collect … But an assessment made by a board or body having no power to make it is a nullity and no lien upon property.

Press Liquors, Inc. v. Frank E. Weakley, Chairman, Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

317 F.2d 135 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 14, 1963

The appellees are the members of that Board and the Commissioners of the District of Columbia. … This court stayed the Board’s order of May 16, 1962, “insofar as such action by the Board may prohibit appellant from purchasing and receiving alcoholic beverages for which appellant makes payment in cash.”

Trump Marina Associates, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board

445 F. App'x 362 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 14, 2011

Board factual determinations are conclusive if they are “supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole.” NLRB v. Brown, 380 U.S. 278, 291 , 85 S.Ct. 980 , 13 L.Ed.2d 839 (1965). … We adopt the Board’s witness credibility determinations unless they are “hopelessly incredible” or “self-contradictory.” Teamsters Local Union No. 171 v. NLRB, 863 F.2d 946 , 953 (D.C.Cir.1988) (quoting Conair Corp. v.

George J. Hurley v. George J. Reed, Chairman, United States Board of Parole

288 F.2d 844 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 2, 1961

The later proceeding, of course, would necessarily be in the District of Columbia where jurisdiction of the Board may be had. Robbins v. Reed, 1959, 106 U.S.App.D.C. 51 , 269 F.2d 242 ; Howell v. … Skelly Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 339 U.S. 667, 671 , 70 S.Ct. 876 , 94 L.Ed. 1194 . Reliance is placed by the Parole Board, however, on two decisions of our court. Clark v.

United States v. Hayes

271 A.2d 701 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 16, 1970

The officers followed the men into the boarded-up building and saw appellee with money in his hand and his companion, one Dade, throw something under a pool table. … Brown v. United States, D.C.App., 261 A.2d 834 (1970).

Robinson v. District of Columbia Government

965 F. Supp. 2d 90 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 30, 2013

Robinson’s friends allegedly told Officer Brown about this injury, Officer Brown refused to remove his arm from Mr. Robinson’s neck. After he was arrested, Mr. … The second document is a 2003 report issued by the Citizen Complaint Review Board (“2003 CCRB Report”).

United Food & Commercial Workers Union Local 204 v. National Labor Relations Board

506 F.3d 1078 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 6, 2007

No. 109, at 37, the ALJ recommended that the Board order Smithfield to bargain with the UFCW pursuant to NLRB v. … Co. v. NLRB, 117 F.3d 627, 630 (D.C. Cir. 1997) (quoting Allegheny Ludlum Corp. v. NLRB, 104 F.3d 1354, 1358 (D.C. Cir. 1997)).

District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department v. District of Columbia Employee Appeals and James O'Boyle

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 22, 2014

Brown v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Corr., 993 A.2d 529, 532 (D.C. 2010). “When reviewing an [] OEA decision, we . . . … Brown v.

United Steelworkers Of America, Afl-Cio, Petitioner v. National Labor Relations Board

377 F.2d 140 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 20, 1966

377 F.2d 140 126 U.S.App.D.C. 255 UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, Armco Steel Corporation, Armco Employees Independent Federation, Inc., Intervenors. … 29 U.S.C. 158(b)(1)(a) 2 61 STAT. 140 (1947), 29 U.S.C. 157 3 Armco Steel Corporation v.

American Bakery & Confectionery Workers International Union v. National Labor Relations Board

379 F.2d 160 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 18, 1967

the reports of Board decisions. … Company, in the face of organizing efforts of the Union, violated Sections 8(a) (1), (2), and (3) of the Act are supported by substantial evidence in the record considered as a whole, as required by Universal Camera Corp. v.

New Castle County Airport Commission v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Allegheny Airlines, Inc., Intervenor

371 F.2d 733 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 9, 1967

See Outagamie County, Wis., v. CAB, 355 F.2d 900, 906-908 (7th Cir. 1966). The Board’s findings as to the various factors are amply supported by the record. … Compare City of Lawrence, Mass. v. CAB, 343 F.2d 583 (1st Cir. 1965). The court had under consideration the Board’s order in the New England Regional Airport Investigation.

Meat & Highway Drivers, Dockmen, Helpers & Miscellaneous Truck Terminal Employees, Local Union No. 710 v. National Labor Relations Board

335 F.2d 709 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 25, 1964

See Labor Board v. Mexia Textile Mills, 339 U. S. 563, 567 , 70 S.Ct. 833 , 94 L.Ed. 1067 (1950), and cases there cited. To the extent that the Board decree is so designed, it will be enforced. V. … Member Brown of the Board, who relied on Retail Clerks Union Local 770 v. N.L.R.B., supra Note 8, dissented from the Board’s decision that the provision here involved violated § 8(e).

Local 374, International Brotherhood of Boilermakers v. National Labor Relations Board

331 F.2d 839 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 9, 1964

International Union of Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers, AFL-CIO v. National Labor Relations Board, 110 U.S.App.D.C. 91 , 289 F.2d 757 (1960). … See Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951).

Local 814, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. National Labor Relations Board

512 F.2d 564 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 30, 1975

Because the Board has not explained its reasons for reaching different results, 6 see Greater Boston Television Corp. v. F. C. … If the Board finds the two indistinguishable, it should so inform the court. See N. L. R. B. v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., 380 U.S. 438, 442 , 85 S.Ct. 1061 , 13 L.Ed.2d 951 (1965).

Washington Hospital Center v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

983 A.2d 961 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 12, 2009

Middledorf v. Wash. Hosp. Ctr. (Middledorf IV), No. 06-20, slip. op. at 6 (Compensation Review Board March 23, 2007), available at 2007 WL 1227538 , 2007 D.C. Wrk. Comp. Lexis 157. II. … Cooper Brown who held two pre-hearing conferences on November 15 and December 20, 2004. Judge Brown was then elevated to the CRB and the case was assigned to ALJ Russell. 3 . Dr.

District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department v. District of Columbia Employee Appeals and James O'Boyle

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 10, 2014

Brown v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Corr., 993 A.2d 529, 532 (D.C. 2010). “When reviewing an [] OEA decision, we . . . … Brown v.

AHMED AIT-GHEZALA v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT, and SB-URBAN, LLC, Intervenor.

148 A.3d 1211 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 10, 2016

Homes, Inc. v. District of Columbia Zoning Comm’n, 975 A.2d 186, 190 (D.C. 2009) (quoting 1330 Connecticut Ave., Inc. v. … The Board may . . . conduct further hearings or . . . even reach a different result.” Washington Ethical Soc’y v. District of Columbia Bd. of Zoning Adjustment, 421 A.2d 14, 19 (D.C. 1980) (quoting Salsbery v.

National Geographic Society v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, Lucy Arlene Thomas. National Geographic Society v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, Laura H. Dorsey. National Geographic Society v. District Unemployment Compensation Board

438 F.2d 154 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 8, 1970

438 F.2d 154 NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY, Appellant, v. DISTRICT UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION BOARD, Lucy Arlene Thomas. NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY, Appellant, v. DISTRICT UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION BOARD, Laura H. Dorsey. … Tunget v. State Employment Security Dept., 2 Wash.App. 574 , 468 P.2d 734 (1970); Sciacca v. Unemployment Compensation Bd. of Review, 189 Pa.Super. 334 , 150 A.2d 557 (1959); Szojka v.

Heartland Plymouth Court MI, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board

650 F. App'x 11 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 3, 2016

Ctr. v. NLRB, 433 F.3d 834, 835 (2005). … Nuclear Operating Co. v. NLRB, 524 F.3d 1350, 1358 (D.C. Cir. *13 2008); NLRB v. U.S. Postal Serv., 8 F.3d 832, 836 (D.C. Cir. 1993).