Case law

Anthony R. Martin-Trigona v. Federal Reserve Board, Bank America Corporation, Intervenor

509 F.2d 363 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 24, 1975

Org. v. Camp, 397 U.S. 150, 152 , 90 S.Ct. 827, 829 , 25 L.Ed.2d 184 (1970). 8 . Id. at 153 , 90 S.Ct. at 830 , 25 L.Ed.2d 184 . 9 . Sierra Club v. … Org. v. Camp, 397 U.S. 150 , 90 S.Ct. 827 , 25 L.Ed.2d 184 (1970); National Ass’n of Securities Dealers, Inc. v.

Navajo Tribe, a Treaty Tribe of Indians v. National Labor Relations Board

288 F.2d 162 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 2, 1961

The decision in Elk v. … Since the suit was one which challenged the Board’s determination as being in excess of the Board’s powers, and a justiciable question of statutory construction was raised, jurisdiction clearly existed. See Leedom v.

National Mediation Board, Leverett Edwards, Individually, Etc. v. Air Line Pilots Association, International

323 F.2d 305 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 12, 1963

On June 18, 1963, the District Court entered a temporary restraining order enjoining the National Mediation Board from taking steps to conduct a representation election in a labor dispute between competing unions and American … Pan American World Airways v. Flight Eng. Intern. Assoc., 306 F.2d 840 (2nd Cir., 1962); Sims v. Greene, 160 F.2d 512 (3rd Cir., 1947). We thus have jurisdiction under 28 *306 U.S.C. § 1292(a) (1).

Western Presbyterian Church v. Board of Zoning Adjustment of the District of Columbia

849 F. Supp. 77 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 15, 1994

District of Columbia Zoning Administrator (“Zoning Administrator”), acting in his capacity as agent of the District of Columbia Department of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs, 2) the March 2,1994 decision on appeal of the Board … Area Transit Auth. v. Holiday Tours, Inc., 559 F.2d 841, 844 (D.C.Cir.1977). This Court finds that the plaintiffs have borne that burden, therefore, the preliminary injunction will issue.

Robinson v. District of Columbia Government

965 F. Supp. 2d 90 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 30, 2013

Robinson’s friends allegedly told Officer Brown about this injury, Officer Brown refused to remove his arm from Mr. Robinson’s neck. After he was arrested, Mr. … The second document is a 2003 report issued by the Citizen Complaint Review Board (“2003 CCRB Report”).

George J. Reed, Chairman, U. S. Board of Parole v. Lloyd D. Butterworth

297 F.2d 776 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 9, 1961

And in Fleming v. … See also Robbins v. Reed, 106 U.S.App.D.C. 51 at 52 , 269 F.2d 242 at 243 (1959). 2 It may be, as the Government says, that the Board lacks subpoena power.

In Re Herndon

596 A.2d 592 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 11, 1991

Board Rule 3.1. … See Brown v. United States, 567 A.2d 426, 427 (D.C.1989) (rule 17(c) not intended to provide additional means of discovery), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 110 S.Ct. 1497 , 108 L.Ed.2d 632 (1990); see also United States v.

Henry C. Field, Jr. v. Harold Brown, Secretary of Defense Henry C. Field, Jr. v. Harold Brown Joseph E. Hoker v. Harold Brown. James G. Little v. W. Graham Claytor, Jr.

610 F.2d 981 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 2, 1980

FIELD, Jr., Appellant, v. Harold BROWN, Secretary of Defense, et al. Henry C. FIELD, Jr., Appellant, v. Harold BROWN et al. Joseph E. HOKER et al., Appellants, v. Harold BROWN. James G. LITTLE, Appellant, v. W. … Communist Party v. Subversive Activities Control Board, 367 U.S. at 71 , 81 S.Ct. at 1397 .

Ezekiel Bates v. Hugh F. Rivers, Executive, District of Columbia Board of Parole

323 F.2d 311 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 15, 1963

This is a declaratory judgment action arising out of revocation of parole by the District of Columbia Board of Parole in which appellant questions the legality of his continued imprisonment. … On May 15, 1959, he was granted parole by the District of Columbia Board of Parole. D.C.Code Ann. § 24r-204.

John A. Pawelczak v. United States of America and Railroad Retirement Board

931 F.2d 108 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 30, 1991

Railroad Retirement Board, 736 F.2d 34, 42 (2d Cir.1984) (“[section 9] does not bind the Board, which can correct the records beyond the four-year period, to ensure their accuracy”); accord Taylor v. … Finch, 418 F.2d 1232, 1234 (8th Cir.1969); Gerend v. Railroad Retirement Board, 248 F.2d 357, 360 (9th Cir.1957).

American Federation of Government Employees, Local 1812 v. Broadcasting Board of Governors

District Court, District of Columbia · May 18, 2010

Goland v. CIA, 607 F.2d 339, 355 (D.C. … Maynard v. C.I.A., 986 F.2d 547, 560 (1st Cir. 1993); Carney v. U.S.

Oakey v. US Airways Pilots Disability Income Plan

723 F.3d 227 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 19, 2013

Judicial review of the board of adjustment’s decision is limited to three categories expressly set out in the RLA. Id. (citing Union Pac. R.R. v. … Cir. 1989) (emphasis in brief)) and (2) “the interpretative issue must be dispositive or conclusive” of the claim, id. at 23 (citing Brown v. Ill. Cent. R.R. Co., 254 F.3d 654, 668 (7th Cir. 2001) (emphasis in brief)).

Vern Mckinley v. Board of Gov. Fed. Reserve Sys

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 3, 2011

Reuss v. Balles, 584 F.2d 461, 462 (D.C. Cir. 1978). Two of the parts are relevant here—the Board and the Federal Reserve Banks (Reserve Banks). … See New York v. EPA, 413 F.3d 3, 20 (D.C.

Harkness v. District of Columbia

8 D.C. 121 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 15, 1873

aforesaid; that plaintiffs have not paid said assessment, and that certificates of indebtedness have been prepared by the board and will be issued, and that it is the design of said board to negotiate the same and collect … But an assessment made by a board or body having no power to make it is a nullity and no lien upon property.

Maghan v. Jerome

88 F.2d 1001 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 18, 1937

Brown v. Selfridge, 224 U.S. 189 , 32 S.Ct. 444 , 56 L.Ed. 727 . … Reversed. 1 Commonwealth v. Carey, 12 Cush. (Mass.) 246, 251.

Local 808, Building Maintenance, Service & Railroad Workers v. National Mediation Board

888 F.2d 1428 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 3, 1989

R.R. v. … Ry. v.

Muhammad v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

34 A.3d 488 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 5, 2012

Board’s mental-mental rule announced in Ramey v. … McCamey, 947 A.2d at 1198 , 1209 (citing Brown v. Dep’t of Employment Servs., 700 A.2d 787, 791-92 (D.C.1997) (other citation omitted)). In Mr.

Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America v. National Labor Relations Board

118 F. Supp. 3d 171 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 29, 2015

Board Mot. at 5–6. In support of this argument, the Board relies on Reno v. … Chamber of Commerce v. Brown, 554 U.S. 60, 67–68 (2008), quoting Letter Carriers v. Austin, 418 U.S. 264, 272–73 (1974).

District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department v. District of Columbia Employee Appeals and James O'Boyle

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 22, 2014

Brown v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Corr., 993 A.2d 529, 532 (D.C. 2010). “When reviewing an [] OEA decision, we . . . … Brown v.

Melvin Brown v. Sandra Hill

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 19, 2023

However, Brown’s allegations regarding the actions of these individuals do not create liability for the District as a defendant. In Monell v. … Triplett v. District of Columbia, 108 F.3d 1450, 1453 (D.C. Cir. 1997) (quoting Jett v. Dallas Indep. Sch. Dist., 491 U.S. 701, 737 (1989)). Brown has not alleged, much less shown, that in the area of mental health Dr.