Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

10,000+ results

4.50s

  • State v. Brown

    2011 La.App. 4 Cir. 0804 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jan 11, 2012

    State v. Williams, 07-648, p. 6 (La.App. 5 Cir. 1/22/08), 977 So.2d 154, 157-158 , citing State v. Gibson, 04-0591 (La.App. 1 Cir. 3/24/05) , 907 So.2d 82, 85, n. 3 . … The State also cites this Court’s decision in State v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    125 Haw. 244 · Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · Mar 21, 2011

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Brown Paper Mill Co.

    133 F.2d 988 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Feb 23, 1943

    National Labor Relations Board v. Brown Paper Mill Co., Inc., 5 Cir., 108 F.2d 867 , certiorari denied 310 U.S. 651 , 60 S.Ct. 1104 , 84 L.Ed. 1416 . … International Ass’n of Machinists v. National Labor Relations Board, 311 U.S. 72 , 61 S.Ct. 83 , 85 L.Ed 50; Solvay Process Company v. National Labor Relations Board, 5 Cir., 117 F.2d 83 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    125 Haw. 247 · Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · Jul 28, 2011

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Hi-Country Estates Homeowners Ass'n v. Bagley & Co.

    269 Utah Adv. Rep. 4 · Utah Supreme Court · Jul 20, 1995

    When a ‘“specific power is conferred by statute upon a tribunal, board, or commission with limited powers, the powers are limited to such as are specifically mentioned.’ ” Union Pac. R.R. v. Public Serv. … See generally Williams v. Public Serv.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    93 So. 3d 1194 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Aug 8, 2012

    Appellant, Dale Brown, appeals the summary denial of his petition for writ of mandamus. We reverse. … Rosado v. State, 1 So.3d 1147, 1148 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    3 Cal. Rptr. 3d 145 · California Supreme Court · Oct 29, 2003

    Brown to death.” We find no error. … (People v. Cunningham (2001) 25 Cal.4th 926, 1030 [ 108 Cal.Rptr.2d 291 , 25 P.3d 519 ], italics added; People v. Brown (1988) 46 Cal.3d 432, 460-461 [ 250 Cal.Rptr. 604 , 758 P.2d 1135 ].)

    Cited 549 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Howson

    129 A.D.3d 570 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 23, 2015

    defendant David Howson’s testimony that he was never informed about cracks or any other defect in the ceiling and plaintiff’s testimony that she never informed building management or Howson of any such cracks (see Figueroa v … However, the court correctly found that in any event the affidavits were insufficiently specific and the alleged notice too far in the past to raise an issue of fact (see Clark v New York City Hous.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    141 N.Y.S.3d 871 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 7, 2021

    People v Brown ( 2021 NY Slip Op 02174 ) People v Brown 2021 NY Slip Op 02174 Decided on April 7, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431 … No. 2025/16) [*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent, v Lashawn Brown, appellant. Paul Skip Laisure, New York, NY (Jenin Younes of counsel; Daniel Chavez on the brief), for appellant.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    342 P.3d 239 · Utah Supreme Court · Oct 24, 2014

    Thus, the issue is not whether L.N. suffered a cognizable injury with a causal nexus to Brown’s misconduct and redressable by an order of the court. See Jenkins v. … JUR. 2D Damages § 444 (2013) (citing cases). 4 See Hughes v. Cafferty, 2004 UT 22, ¶ 21, 89 P.3d 148; Blake v. Blake, 412 P.2d 454, 456 (Utah 1966). 8

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    2020 Ohio 4671 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 30, 2020

    [Cite as State v. Brown, 2020-Ohio-4671.] … Brown appealed, asserting several assignments of error that reached beyond the scope of his resentencing.1 See State v. Brown, 9th Dist.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Chrismon v. Brown

    246 S.W.3d 102 · Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · Jan 10, 2008

    Co. v. … Co. v.

    Cited 65 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Brown

    2006 Pa. Super. 318 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 9, 2006

    Commonwealth v. … Commonwealth v.

    Cited 78 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    2022 Ohio 1917 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 31, 2022

    [Cite as State v. Brown, 2022-Ohio-1917.] … . {¶1} On April 18, 2022, Appellant, Roy Wilton Brown, filed a pro se App.R. 26(B) application to reopen his direct appeal in State v. Brown, 7th Dist. Belmont No. 21 BE 0012, 2022-Ohio-893.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    195 A.D.3d 1577 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 17, 2021

    People v Brown ( 2021 NY Slip Op 03970 ) People v Brown 2021 NY Slip Op 03970 Decided on June 17, 2021 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431 … VLADIMIR BROWN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Janecka

    143 N.M. 214 · New Mexico Supreme Court · Dec 13, 2007

    175 P.3d 308 (2007) 2007-NMCERT-012 BROWN v. JANECKA. No. 30,342 (12-501). Supreme Court of New Mexico. December 13, 2007. Writ Quashed.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    2025 Ohio 5854 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 31, 2025

    [Cite as State v. Brown, 2025-Ohio-5854.] … . {¶40} Therefore, there was sufficient evidence to convict Brown of aggravated burglary. Brown’s third assignment of error is overruled. V. Manifest Weight of the Evidence [Cite as State v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    2025 Ohio 2018 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 4, 2025

    [Cite as State v. Brown, 2025-Ohio-2018.] … State v. Moore, 2012-Ohio-4483 (5th Dist.) ¶ 16. The applicable standard of review in this matter is abuse of discretion. State v. Calderon, 2010-Ohio- 2807, ¶ 6 (9th Dist.).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    205 N.J. 76 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 18, 2011

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • National Labor Relations Board v. E. C. Brown Co.

    184 F.2d 829 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 31, 1950

    Upon this motion the respondents do not dispute the Board’s findings that the Brown Company discharged one employee because he was trying to organize a union, and had refused to promote another for the same reason; that the … They confine themselves to two challenges of the Board’s findings: (1) that Brown Company shut down its factory on November 19th, 1947, to circumvent the union; and (2) that the Production Line was a dummy. of the Brown Company

    Cited 6 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.