Case law

EF International Language Schools, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

673 F. App'x 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 10, 2017

Bay Hosps. v. NLRB, 687 F.3d 424, 437 (D.C. Cir. 2012); Titanium Metals Corp. v. NLRB, 392 F.3d 439, 446 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … We review the decision of the Board, not that of the ALJ. See Kiewit Power Constructors Co. v. NLRB, 652 F.3d 22, 25-26 (D.C.

Anthony R. Martin-Trigona v. Federal Reserve Board, Bank America Corporation, Intervenor

509 F.2d 363 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 24, 1975

Org. v. Camp, 397 U.S. 150, 152 , 90 S.Ct. 827, 829 , 25 L.Ed.2d 184 (1970). 8 . Id. at 153 , 90 S.Ct. at 830 , 25 L.Ed.2d 184 . 9 . Sierra Club v. … Org. v. Camp, 397 U.S. 150 , 90 S.Ct. 827 , 25 L.Ed.2d 184 (1970); National Ass’n of Securities Dealers, Inc. v.

In Re: Navy Chaplaincy

170 F. Supp. 3d 21 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 16, 2016

Brown, the current President of AGC ("Brown Deel.") , Dkt. No. 227- 16, who identifies several individuals that AGC endorsed but were rejected by CHC. See e.g., Brown Deel. … Larsen v. U.S. Navy, 525 F.3d 1, 4 (D.C. Cir. 2008) (quoting Los Angeles County v. Davis, 440 U.S. 625, 631 (1979)).

Duvall v. Postmaster General, United States Postal Service

585 F. Supp. 1374 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 1, 1984

See Ezell v. Mobile Housing Board, 709 F.2d 1376 , 1380 n. 8 (11th Cir.1983); Backus v. Baptist Medical Center, 671 F.2d 1100 (8th Cir.1982); *1378 Marentette v. … Brown v. General Services Administration, 425 U.S. 820 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976); Kizas v. Webster, 707 F.2d 524 (D.C. Cir.1983).

Connecticut Bankers Ass'n v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

627 F.2d 245 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 7, 1980

See Investment Company Institute v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 179 U.S.App.D.C. 311 , 314 n.2, 551 F.2d 1270 , 1273 n.2 (1977); Independent Bankers Ass’n of Georgia v. … Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 591 F.2d 334, 335 (5th Cir. 1979); Citicorp v.

Henry C. Field, Jr. v. Harold Brown, Secretary of Defense Henry C. Field, Jr. v. Harold Brown Joseph E. Hoker v. Harold Brown. James G. Little v. W. Graham Claytor, Jr.

610 F.2d 981 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 2, 1980

FIELD, Jr., Appellant, v. Harold BROWN, Secretary of Defense, et al. Henry C. FIELD, Jr., Appellant, v. Harold BROWN et al. Joseph E. HOKER et al., Appellants, v. Harold BROWN. James G. LITTLE, Appellant, v. W. … Communist Party v. Subversive Activities Control Board, 367 U.S. at 71 , 81 S.Ct. at 1397 .

Julius Bayken v. United States Board of Parole

322 F.2d 430 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 25, 1963

Combined with Hyser were the following cases: Jatoft v. Chappell, No. 16806; Whitting v. Reed, No. 16811; Thompson r. United States Board of Parole, No. 16873; Neiswenter v. Chappell, No. 17041; Fitzpatrick v. … Chappell, No. 17042; Williamson v. Chappell, No. 17043; and Jamison v. Chappell, No. 17059.

George J. Reed, Chairman, U. S. Board of Parole v. Lloyd D. Butterworth

297 F.2d 776 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 9, 1961

And in Fleming v. … See also Robbins v. Reed, 106 U.S.App.D.C. 51 at 52 , 269 F.2d 242 at 243 (1959). 2 It may be, as the Government says, that the Board lacks subpoena power.

Jadallah v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

476 A.2d 671 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 8, 1984

Hawkins v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, 381 A.2d 619, 622 (D.C.1977) (per curiam). … Kopff v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, 381 A.2d 1372, 1385-86 (D.C.1977); General Railway Signal Co. v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, 354 A.2d 529, 531 (D.C.1976); Wallace v.

Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

228 F.2d 17 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 24, 1955

228 F.2d 17 97 U.S.App.D.C. 46 , 12 P.U.R.3d 286 DELTA AIR LINES, Inc., Petitioner, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Respondent. … Federal Communications Comm., 326 U.S. 327 , 66 S.Ct. 148 , 90 L.Ed. 108 (1945) 6 Northwest Airlines v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 90 U.S.App.D.C. 158 , 194 F.2d 339 (D.C.Cir.1952); Western Air Lines v.

Boone v. MOUNTAINMADE FOUNDATION

684 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 15, 2010

Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64, 67 (D.C.Cir.2003); Holy Land Found, for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . … Warren v. District of Columbia, 353 F.3d 36, 40 (D.C.Cir.2004); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . “Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements, do not suffice.”

Aircoach Transport Association, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

255 F.2d 185 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 8, 1958

See Eccles v. Peoples Bank, 1948, 333 U.S. 426 , 68 S.Ct. 641 , 92 L.Ed. 784 ; Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United States, 1939, 307 U.S. 125, 130 , 59 S.Ct. 754 , 83 L.Ed. 1147 . … See California Oregon Power Co. v. F.P.C., 1956, 99 U.S.App.D.C. 263, 270 , 239 F.2d 426, 433 .

Textile Workers Union of America, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board

420 F.2d 635 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 14, 1969

after the Supreme Court decided NLRB v. … had virtually abandoned the Joy Silk Mills, Inc. v.

Jackson v. Spencer

313 F. Supp. 3d 302 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 15, 2018

See, e.g., Fisher v. Peters, 249 F.3d 433 , 438 (6th Cir. 2001) ; Brown v. United States, 227 F.3d 295 , 298 (5th Cir. 2000) ; Hodge v. Dalton , 107 F.3d 705 , 707-12 (9th Cir. 1997) ; Randall v. … Kendall v. Army Bd. for Corr. of Military Records , 996 F.2d 362 , 365 (D.C. Cir. 1993). Thus, a challenge to military board of corrections decision must be filed within six years of an adverse review board decision.

Navajo Tribe, a Treaty Tribe of Indians v. National Labor Relations Board

288 F.2d 162 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 2, 1961

The decision in Elk v. … Since the suit was one which challenged the Board’s determination as being in excess of the Board’s powers, and a justiciable question of statutory construction was raised, jurisdiction clearly existed. See Leedom v.

Great Lakes Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

293 F.2d 153 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 8, 1961

Great Lakes Airlines v. C. A. B., supra at note 1 . … We find no abuse of the Board’s discretion. The order of the Board is Affirmed. 1 . Great Lakes Airlines v. C. A. B., 111 U.S.App.D.C.-, 294 F.2d 217 ; United Air Lines v. C. A. B., 1960, 108 U.S.

National Mediation Board, Leverett Edwards, Individually, Etc. v. Air Line Pilots Association, International

323 F.2d 305 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 12, 1963

On June 18, 1963, the District Court entered a temporary restraining order enjoining the National Mediation Board from taking steps to conduct a representation election in a labor dispute between competing unions and American … Pan American World Airways v. Flight Eng. Intern. Assoc., 306 F.2d 840 (2nd Cir., 1962); Sims v. Greene, 160 F.2d 512 (3rd Cir., 1947). We thus have jurisdiction under 28 *306 U.S.C. § 1292(a) (1).

Local 808, Building Maintenance, Service & Railroad Workers v. National Mediation Board

888 F.2d 1428 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 3, 1989

R.R. v. … Ry. v.

Western Presbyterian Church v. Board of Zoning Adjustment of the District of Columbia

849 F. Supp. 77 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 15, 1994

District of Columbia Zoning Administrator (“Zoning Administrator”), acting in his capacity as agent of the District of Columbia Department of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs, 2) the March 2,1994 decision on appeal of the Board … Area Transit Auth. v. Holiday Tours, Inc., 559 F.2d 841, 844 (D.C.Cir.1977). This Court finds that the plaintiffs have borne that burden, therefore, the preliminary injunction will issue.

In Re Herndon

596 A.2d 592 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 11, 1991

Board Rule 3.1. … See Brown v. United States, 567 A.2d 426, 427 (D.C.1989) (rule 17(c) not intended to provide additional means of discovery), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 110 S.Ct. 1497 , 108 L.Ed.2d 632 (1990); see also United States v.