Case law

Attorney Grievance Commission v. O'Leary

433 Md. 2 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jul 10, 2013

The Amended Petition clearly established that all issues, including legal and physical custody, visitation, child support, ownership of personal property, value of marital property, expenses of health insurance and attorney … Cosgrove, without establishing any nex *32 us to her misconduct.

Chester Haven Beach Partnership v. Board of Appeals

103 Md. App. 324 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Feb 9, 1995

Ordinance clearly intended] that the character of the existing neighborhood was to be preserved____ Clearly, the Applicant envisions an apartment complex in an area where apartments do not exist. *337 The Board then noted … It recommended favorably that, which, if granted, would have been clearly illegal and arbitrary.

Hickey v. Peck

180 Md. 289 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jan 13, 1942

The general rule as to the effect of ratification of sales by a court of equity was established in Maryland as far back as 1855, when the court, in Brown v. … Under their general powers they clearly have the right to protect the recovery of overdue taxes by purchasing the property even without a specific statute.

Howard v. Hobbs

125 Md. 636 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Apr 9, 1915

under consideration, and all similar cases, are placed upon the ground that *647 the transaction is exclusively between the creditor and debtor, and in view of all the circumstances that the intention of the creditor is clearly … It was attempted to be shown that in the year 1911 they did not treat her kindly, but that is not established and hence need not be discussed. The testimony of Mrs.

Schisler v. State

394 Md. 519 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Sep 14, 2006

Established; purpose. (a) Established. — There is a Public Service Commission. (b) Independent unit. — The Commission is an independent unit in the Executive Branch of State government. … for the rest of the term and until a successor qualifies.” .

Doe v. Community College of Baltimore County

District Court, D. Maryland · Jan 13, 2022

In my view, Count II is clearly the more appropriate vehicle to address plaintiffs’ negligence claim. … Ohio Oct. 7, 2020) (“The law is clearly established that colleges and universities do not stand in loco parentis.”); Ginsburg v. City of Ithaca, 839 F.

Molter v. State

201 Md. App. 155 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Sep 7, 2011

State, 225 Md. at 475-76 , 171 A.2d 244 (“Clearly these established facts were sufficient to support a credible inference that the possessor was the burglar as well as the thief.”); Ponder v. … Having been taken between seven and nine days earlier, the goods clearly qualified as having been recently stolen. From all of this, the permitted inference arose that the appellant was the thief.

LeRoux

District Court, D. Maryland · Oct 24, 2025

To establish a violation of either discrimination statute, a plaintiff must show that he: (1) “is a qualified individual with a disability,” (2) “was discriminated against, excluded from participation in, or denied the … Seventeen officers were on the scene, most without any clearly assigned roles. ECF No. 134-21, at 18.

Northeast Community Organization, Inc. v. Weinberger

378 F. Supp. 1287 · District Court, D. Maryland · Jun 24, 1974

But the availability of review under the Administrative Procedure Act is necessarily limited to those administrative decisions which are “made without a rational explanation, inexplicably [depart] . . . from established policies … and was properly denied by HEW through the Commissioner of Education for Region III. *1293 First, the previously quoted language of § 1607(b) clearly provides that assistance is only given to NPOs for “programs or projects

Mascaro v. Snelling & Snelling of Baltimore, Inc.

250 Md. 215 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jun 26, 1968

It was further stated “This was clearly not intended by any one.” With great respect, this appears to me to-beg the question. … franchisee’s “market,” •as it were, and Philadelphia Snelling was obliged to give Baltimore Snelling a licensing agreement most beneficial to the franchisee and at a small license payment in order to obtain a •competent and qualified

Hawkins v. Department of Public Safety & Correctional Services

325 Md. 621 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Mar 10, 1992

Our responsibility is to insure that citizens are not deprived of fundamental rights by virtue of working for the government; this does not require a grant of immunity for employee grievances not afforded by the First Amendment … Clearly, Hawkins was not attempting to stimulate a dialogue on the Holocaust.

Baltimore Teachers Union v. Maryland State Board of Education

379 Md. 192 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jan 16, 2004

The General Assembly has clearly ratified the reconstitution regulations. *205 IV. … General Assembly to establish system of free public schools.

Chambers v. State

337 Md. 44 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Dec 19, 1994

Of course this is entirely different from a qualified verdict in a murder or rape case. … It *63 simply is not the office of rule construction to invalidate a properly promulgated and clearly worded rule.

Street v. Wormuth

District Court, D. Maryland · Mar 31, 2025

A facial challenge asserts “that the allegations pleaded in the complaint are insufficient to establish subject matter jurisdiction.” Id. … Department of the Army is clearly a suit against the sovereign. A declaratory judgment invalidating the Settlement Agreement would ultimately expose the employer—that is, the federal government— to civil liability.

Blumenthal v. Clerk of the Circuit Court

278 Md. 398 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Oct 22, 1976

The result is that (q), by its own terms, qualifies the mandatory effect of those prior subsections. … Here, the counties properly utilized the time before July 1 to establish appropriate tax rates.

Gebhardt & Smith LLP v. Maryland Port Administration

188 Md. App. 532 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Oct 29, 2009

Second, the MPA argued that it was entitled to summary judgment based on sovereign immunity. … The MDOT auditors followed established audit procedures that were for the purpose of documenting the allowable “operating expenses in accordance with the standard lease agreement.” Mr.

Murphy v. Fishman

207 Md. App. 269 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Sep 4, 2012

Had the 2007 Deed been found void ab initio, and even had the Lender qualified as a bona fide purchaser, appellees would not have prevailed. … As to the establishment of the constructive trust, we observe that, in cases where a constructive trust was established as a result of finding a confidential relationship, Maryland appellate courts have not held that the

Midway Enterprises, Inc. v. Petroleum Marketing Corp.

375 F. Supp. 1339 · District Court, D. Maryland · May 16, 1974

Nor does it immunize the outlawed acts because they are done by any of these.’ ” [ 360 F.2d at 419 ] [quoting Mandeville Island Farms, Inc. v. … Then, too, establishing a high price at the retail market would support any raise at the wholesale level.

Hamilton v. Mayor of Baltimore

807 F. Supp. 2d 331 · District Court, D. Maryland · Aug 3, 2011

any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities … Thus, they assert that it does not qualify as a statement made “in conjunction with” plaintiffs termination. Id.

Skinner v. Liller

District Court, D. Maryland · Mar 4, 2020

They also argue that the record evidence does not support a finding of violations of Skinner’s constitutional rights or of the ADA, and that they are entitled to qualified immunity. … Because Defendants provide no argument or analysis on qualified immunity other than to state the general legal standard, that argument has not been properly asserted and will not be considered. A.