Case law

SAIF Corp. v. DeLeon

241 Or. App. 614 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 23, 2011

We agree with SAIF that ORS 656.382(2), as interpreted by this court in Santos v. Caryall Transport, 171 Or App 467, 469 , 17 P3d 509 (2000), rev den, 332 Or 558 (2001) (Santos II), and SAIF v. … Claimant appealed the ALJ’s order to the Workers’ Compensation Board, and the board reversed the ALJ, reinstating the 11 percent award.

Oregon Newspaper Publishers Ass'n v. Peterson

244 Or. 116 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 3, 1966

To like effect, see American Can Co. v. … Angelos v. Board of Dental Examiners, 244 Or 1 , 414 P2d 335 (1966).

Hughes, Trustee v. Honeyman

186 Or. 616 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 24, 1949

The Home v. Selling, 91 Or. 428, 438 , 179 P. 261 , 21 A. L. R. 403; Brown v. Drake, 103 Or. 607, 609 , 205 P. 1002 . See 34 C. J. S., Executors and Administrators, section 396 and note 70; 24 C. … The idea is put forward that the court’s comment in Brown v.

Short v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

305 Or. 541 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 26, 1988

Like its companion cases of Greenslitt v. City of Lake Oswego, 305 Or 530 , 754 P2d 570 (1988), and Guill v. … Ohlig v.

Rogers v. CorVel Enterprise Comp, Inc.

317 Or. App. 116 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 20, 2022

Coday v. … See Seeley v.

Bergerson v. Salem-Keizer School District

341 Or. 401 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 28, 2006

Norden v. Water Resources Dept., 329 Or 641, 645 , 996 P2d 958 (2000). As part of that first level of analysis, this court considers its prior interpretations of the statute. State v. … See, e.g., State v. Reid, 319 Or 65, 68-69 , 872 P2d 416 (1994) (citing and relying upon pre-PGE case law); State ex rel Huddleston v. Sawyer, 324 Or 597, 608 , 932 P2d 1145 (1997) (same).

State v. Lyon

83 Or. App. 592 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 11, 1987

We decline to do so. 7 See State v. Brown, 297 Or 404 , 445 n 35, 687 P2d 751 (1984); State v. Bennett, 17 Or App 197 , 521 P2d 31 (1974); State v. Bass, 76 Or App 396 , 708 P2d 1207 (1985); State v. … The act is administered by the Board on Police Standards and Training.

T. M. E. v. Strope

307 Or. App. 156 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 7, 2020

E. v. … v.

Liles v. Damon Corp.

210 Or. App. 303 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 27, 2006

v. … Brown, 291 Or at 82-83 .

State v. Paquin

55 Or. App. 676 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 25, 1982

In State v. … However, doubt has been cast on the suggestion in Brown that the joinder requirement is of constitutional origin. See State v.

State v. Hart

309 Or. 646 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 17, 1990

In State v. … Brown, 297 Or 404, 445 , 687 P2d 751 (1984), that polygraph evidence is not admissible, over proper objection, in any civil or criminal trial in this state. In State v.

Dayton v. Multnomah County

34 Or. 239 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1898

This is practically the holding in Smith v. Kelly, 24 Or. 464 ( 33 Pac. 642 ). … And the court is not without precedent for its decision in Dayton v. Board of Equalization. See Orr v. State Board of Equalization, 2 Idaho, 923 ( 28 Pac. 416 ).

Gettman v. State Accident Insurance Fund

289 Or. 609 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 10, 1980

Weller v. Union Carbide, 288 Or 27 , 602 P2d 259 (1979); Sahnow v. Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co., 260 Or 564 , 491 P2d 997 (1971). … The circumstances suggest to us, however, that the Court of Appeals may have affirmed the Board as the result of an erroneous interpretation of the law. In Bowman v.

TriMet v. Wilkinson

257 Or. App. 80 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 12, 2013

In advancing that argument, employer relies on Columbia Forest Products v. … (Citation omitted; emphasis in original.)); SAIF v. Tull, 113 Or App 449, 454 , 832 P2d 1271 (1992) (“[Wjhether an acceptance occurs is an issue of fact.”); Garcia v.

Rivas v. Persson

256 Or. App. 829 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 30, 2013

Citing Hamel v. … The second case that informs our analysis is Janowski/Fleming v. Board of Parole, 349 Or 432 , 245 P3d 1270 (2010).

Wiggins Co. v. McMinnville Motor Car Co.

111 Or. 123 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 29, 1924

A case similar in principle is that of Wood v. Lester, 29 Barb. (N. Y.) 145. See, also, Tedford v. Wilson, 3 Head (Tenn.), 311; Pope v. Foster, 7 Baxt. (Tenn.) 98 . … Bean, Brown and MoCourt, JJ., concur.

Marcum v. Adventist Health System/West

215 Or. App. 166 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 26, 2007

See State v. O’Key, 321 Or 285 , 899 P2d 663 (1995); State v. Brown, 297 Or 404 , 687 P2d 751 (1984). … Brown, 297 Or at 417 . 8 Those factors “are guidelines, not a checklist.” State v. St. Hilaire, 97 Or App 108, 112 , 775 P2d 876 (1989).

State v. Nguyen

293 Or. App. 492 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 22, 2018

See State v. Hobbs , 218 Or. App. 298 , 309, 179 P.3d 682 , rev. den. , 345 Or. 175 , 190 P.3d 1237 (2008). … (citing State v. Davis , 336 Or. 19 , 32, 77 P.3d 1111 (2003) ).

SAIF Corp. v. Owens

247 Or. App. 402 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 29, 2011

In Hicks v. … Libbett v.

SAIF v. Krusenstjerna

346 Or. App. 429 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 7, 2026

Providence Health System v. … On this record then, the board opinion lacks sub- stantial evidence and substantial reason. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp. v.