Case law

Palmer v. BD. OF COM'RS FOR PAYNE COUNTY OKLAHOMA

765 F. Supp. 2d 1289 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jan 18, 2011

See, Sealock v. … The Board of Comity Commissioners for Payne County was named as a Defendant in the amended complaint but was subsequently dismissed at Plaintiff’s request [Doc. Nos. 33 and 34]. 2 .

State Ex Rel. Haskell v. Huston

21 Okla. 782 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 29, 1908

In Hanning v. … Bulkley v. Treadway, 11 Root (Conn.) 552; West v. Tolland, 25 Conn. 133 ; Anderson v. Gregory, 43 Conn. 61, 63 ; Moriarty v. Mason, 47 Conn. 436; Main v. Main, 48 Conn. 301”—and ordered the writ to issue.

State Ex Rel. Dabney v. Ledbetter

156 Okla. 23 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 22, 1932

Ledbetter, as a regularly licensed attorney at law, or refer the matter to the Board of Governors of the Oklahoma State Bar for its consideration. On March 7, 1932, the respondent, H. A. … Pearson et al. v. John Yewdall et al., 95 U. S. 295 , 24 L. Ed. 436 ; and in the case of James K. Brown v. State of New Jersey, 44 L. Ed. 119 , Mr.

Ferrell v. State of Oklahoma Ex Rel. Hall

339 F. Supp. 73 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · May 22, 1972

Oklahoma was the first State in the Nation to abolish dual school systems after the Supreme Court decided Brown v. Board of Education and same was done by popular vote. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. … Reynolds v. State Election Board, 233 F.Supp. 323 (W.D.Okl.1964). *82 7.

POLK v. STATE

2022 OK CR 24 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 29, 2022

POLK v. STATE 2022 OK CR 24 Case Number: F-2021-343 Decided: 09/29/2022 JESSICA MARIE POLK, Appellant v. … State v. Ceasar , 2010 OK CR 15 237 P.3d 792 Id. , 2010 OK CR 15 Id. , 2010 OK CR 15 See Lime v.

KENKEL v. PARKER

2015 OK 81 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 24, 2015

Co-op , Inc . v. Oklahoma Gas & Elec . Co ., 1973 OK 3, ¶13, 505 P.2d 1324. 10 Sneed v. Tippett , 1925 OK 336, ¶12, 245 P. 40. 11 F anning v. Brown , 2004 OK 7, ¶16, 85 P.3d 841 Sautbine v. … Brown , see note 11, supra; Sautbine v. Keller , see note 11, supra; State ex rel . Okla . Employment Sec . Com'n v. Tulsa Flower Exchange , see note 11, supra. 21 Fanning v.

Sullins v. State Ex Rel. Barnard

33 Okla. 526 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 20, 1912

Taylor v. … As in Board of Commissioners, etc., v. State ex rel.

Putnam v. The United States Army Review Board Agency

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Sep 29, 2023

Davis v. United States, 343 F.3d 1282, 1295 (10th Cir. 2003); see Def.’s Mot. at 8; Holt v. … v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322 (1986).

IN THE MATTER OF I.T.S.

490 P.3d 127 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 22, 2021

Fanning v. Brown , 2004 OK 7, ¶ 10 , 85 P.3d 841, 845 . … CICIO Discussed 2003 OK 90 , 89 P.3d 1022 , HOLLAWAY v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE CO. OF AMERICA Discussed 2004 OK 7 , 85 P.3d 841 , FANNING v. BROWN Discussed 2005 OK 13 , 109 P.3d 345 , CASEY v.

Parks v. Board of County Commissioners of Oklahoma County

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Aug 31, 2023

Frank v. Crawley Petroleum Corp., 992 F.3d 987, 998 (10th Cir. 2021) (internal quotation omitted). “Absent ‘legal prejudice’ to the defendant, the district court normally should grant such a dismissal.” Ohlander v. … Cnty. of Santa Fe v. Pub. Serv. Co., 311 F.3d 1031, 1049 (10th Cir. 2002).

HAMILTON v. STATE

2016 OK CR 13 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 1, 2016

v. … STATE Discussed 2008 OK CR 3, 177 P.3d 577, BROWN v. STATE Discussed at Length 1977 OK CR 41, 560 P.2d 207, HANF v. STATE Discussed Title 21.

Dunham v. Marine Midland Trust Co.

175 Okla. 461 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 21, 1935

Erns-berger & Co., Inc., was conducted and carried on by boards of directors at Oklahoma City. … Denison v. Phipps, 87 Okla. 299 , 211 P. 83 . We see nothing in this fact to warrant the inference that the defendant was present and doing business in Oklahoma. Rosenberg Bros. & Co. v. Curtis Brown Co., 260 U.

Bell v. State

502 P.2d 342 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 11, 1972

Brown. She testified that at approximately 10:30 a. m. on the 16th day of June, 1971, she drove in her driveway and noticed a car backed into Mrs. Brown’s driveway. … Jones v. State, Okl.Cr., 468 P.2d 805 . The final proposition contends that the punishment is excessive.

Keiser v. Kile

166 Okla. 41 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 24, 1933

A man by the name of Brown was the original owner of the land. Brown executed two mortgages to defendant, Keiser, one for $1,500 and a second mortgage for $112.50. … In the case of Ward v.

Grayson v. Stith

192 Okla. 340 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 20, 1943

Stith v. P. E. … Grayson v. Stith, 181 Okla. 131 , 72 P. 2d 820 .

St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Royal Insurance Co.

100 Okla. 11 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 1, 1924

Co. v. Brown, 76 Okla. 84 , 183 Pac. 889 . … Co. v. Brown, supra. The defendant undertakes to'distinguish between this cause and the Brown Case, because of certain claimed differences between the two records.

Altstatt v. Board Of County Commissioners for Oklahoma County

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Sep 19, 2023

Lugar v. … See Brereton v.

Wright v. State

552 P.2d 1157 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 26, 1976

In Guthrey v. … In United States v.

Altstatt v. Board Of County Commissioners for Oklahoma County

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Sep 26, 2023

CIV-22-811-D ) BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ) FOR OKLAHOMA COUNTY; et al., ) … Plaintiff asserts claims under § 1983 and Bosh v.

Altstatt v. Board Of County Commissioners for Oklahoma County

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Sep 25, 2023

at 998 (quoting Brown v. Montoya, 662 F.3d 1152, 1164 (10th Cir. 2011)). Plaintiff must also show “a causal relationship between the policy or custom and the underlying (10th Cir. 2006). … Brown v. Flowers, 974 F.3d 1178, 1184 (10th Cir. 2020) (quoting Perry v. Durborow, 892 F.3d 1116, 1123 (10th Cir. 2018)).