Case law

Graf Bros. v. D & E Realty Co.

244 A.2d 806 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 9, 1968

The case, in our opinion, falls within the principle set forth in Brown Transport Corp. v. United Merchants & Mfrs., 21 A. D.2d 303, 250 N.Y.S.2d 440 (1964). … Co. v. Mohawk Dairy Co., 250 Mass. 1, 9 , 144 N.E. 721, 724 [1924]; C. B. & Q. R. Co. v. Evans, etc., 221 Mo.App. 757, 762 , 288 S.W. 73, 75 [1926]; Central of Georgia Rwy. Co. v.

Spenlinhauer v. R.R. Donnelley & Sons Co.

534 F. Supp. 2d 162 · District Court, D. Maine · Feb 19, 2008

See, e.g., Waters v. … such courts”); Snapper Inc. v.

State v. Stack

441 A.2d 673 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 16, 1982

State v. Brown, Me., 321 A.2d 478, 482 (1974). However, “in determining the guilt of an accused, the jury should not consider or be influenced by the punishment that that defendant would receive if he were convicted.” … State v. Brown, supra at 485. The trial justice’s ruling did not deny the defendants their constitutional right of confrontation. V.

Ross v. Gould

5 Me. 204 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 15, 1828

Little v. Megquier 2, Greenl. 276. Robinson v. Swett & al. 3. Greenl. 316, and Proprietors of Kennebec Purchase v. Laboree 2. Greenl. 275, and the cases there cited. … A disseisin cannot be committed by mistake; Gay v. Brown 3.

Lightfoot v. State of Maine Legislature

583 A.2d 694 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 6, 1990

See Supreme Court of Virginia v. Consumers Union of the United States, Inc., 446 U.S. 719, 731-34 , 100 S.Ct. 1967, 1974-76 , 64 L.Ed.2d 641 (1980); see also Board of Ov *695 erseers of the Bar v. … Gurschick v. Clark, 511 A.2d 36 (Me.1986); M.R.Civ.P. 83(3). The entry is: Judgment affirmed.

Ockington v. Law

66 Me. 551 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 25, 1877

Manning v. Brown, 10 Maine, 4-9. II. … Sears v. Wright, 24 Maine, 278. Wilder v. Sprague, 50 Maine, 354. Bradford v. Drew, 5 Met. 188 . Exceptions overruled. Appleton, C. J., DicKErson, Barrows, Virgin and Libbey, JJ., concurred.

Pope v. Cutler

22 Me. 105 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 15, 1842

While in the case of Blanchard v. … A’nd in the case of Berry v.

Calaska Partners, L.P. v. Dahl

676 A.2d 498 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 17, 1996

It is well established that the attorney’s actions are to be regarded as the actions of the client, Moulton v. Brown, 627 A.2d 521, 523 (Me.1993); Mockus v. … Bank v. Brooks, 578 A.2d 1174, 1176 (Me.1990).

Vesanen v. Pohjola

140 Me. 216 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 15, 1944

Coburn v. Palmer, 10 Cush., 273 ; Jones v. Jones, 87 Me., 117, 32 A., 779 . It was a procedure which this court in Jones v. … Jones v. Jones, supra.

Bloom v. Crook

78 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, D. Maine · Dec 10, 1999

He arne v. … Labor Relations Board).

Union Insurance v. Greenleaf

64 Me. 123 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1874

Cabot v. Given, 45 Maine, 144; Baker v. Cotter, 45 Maine, 236; Brown v. Donnell, 49 Maine, 421. The note reads as follows: “Boston, Oct. 17, 1872. $326. … In Taylor v.

State v. Cookson

204 A.3d 125 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 26, 2019

State v. … See Cooper v.

Roberts v. Skolfield

20 F. Cas. 932 · District Court, D. Maine · Sep 15, 1858

Elwell v. Martin [Case No. 4, 425]; Pratt v. Thomas [Id. 11,377]. But another objection is made, which goes to the whole libel, and requires a more detailed and deliberate consideration. … Gibbons v. Ogden, 9 Wheat. [22 U. S.] 194.

High Maine, LLC v. Town of Kittery

2024 ME 76 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 14, 2024

On June 6, 2023, High Maine objected to GTF Kittery 8’s change in the location of the premises to encompass two floors and argued to the Planning Board that the Board should not approve GTF Kittery 8’s change of use and … Paul v.

Online Transp., Inc. v. Forest Mansur

Superior Court of Maine · Oct 14, 2010

'f/ Cl v iJ ONLINE TRANSPORT, INC., Plaintiff v. … Spickler v. Dube, 644 A.2d 465, 468 n.6 (Me. 1994); Land Management, Inc. v. Dept. of Envtl. Prot., 368 A.2d 602, 603 (Me. 1977).

Durham v. McCready

129 Me. 279 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 17, 1930

A similar situation arose in Gould v. Murch, 70 Me., 288. In that case, Mr. Justice Libbey, speaking for the Court and relying upon Thompson v. Gould, 20 Pick., 134 ; Gould v. Thompson, 4 Met., 224 ; and Wells v. … Osborn, 120 Pac., 755 ; Lachance v. Brown, 183 Pac., 216 , by Oregon in Powell et al v. S. & G. R. R., 8 Pac., 544 ; Elmore et al v. Stephens-Russell Co., 171 Pac., 763 , and by New Hampshire in Wilson v. Clarke, 60 N.

State Tax Assessor v. Tracfone Wireless, Inc.

2022 ME 36 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 23, 2022

Goggin v. … See Wawenock, LLC v.

Newbit v. Inhabitants of Appleton

63 Me. 491 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1874

In Perley v. Oldtown, 49 Maine, 31, cited by plaintiff, the same point was involved in the facts, but does not seem to have attracted the attention of either the counsel or court. But in Rogers v. … The case of Underwood v. Scituate, 7 Metc., 214 , is in the same direction, as far as it goes. The case of Ilsley v. Essex Co., 7 Gray, 465 , is not in conflict with it.

Snyder v. Talbot

589 A.2d 443 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 22, 1991

The Superior Court (Browne, A.R.J.) granted the motion to reopen. The motion to alter or amend or for relief from judgment was scheduled for hearing before the trial judge. … See Durgin v. Robertson, 428 A.2d 65, 65 (Me.1981). Both parties filed motions for reconsideration.

Maine Farmer Publishing Co. v. Rowe

108 Me. 194 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 6, 1911

Moody v. Brown, 34 Maine, 107. Judgment for the defendant.