Case law

Burns v. Lovett

104 F. Supp. 312 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 31, 1952

As' stated in the memorandum opinion in the case of Dennis v. Lovett, D. … Hiatt v. Brown, 339 U.S. 103 , 70 S.Ct. 495 , 94 L.Ed. 691 , decided March 13, 1950.

Elsa Maldonado v. DC

61 F.4th 1004 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 10, 2023

Indeed, the case is no more moot than Brown v. … See In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 756 F.3d 754, 763 (D.C.

Nyunt v. Tomlinson

543 F. Supp. 2d 25 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 21, 2008

Stella v. Mineta, 284 F.3d 135, 145 (D.C.Cir.2002) (quoting Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C.Cir.1999)). … See Brown v. Marsh, 777 F.2d 8, 13 (D.C.Cir.1985); see also Rattigan v. Gonzales, 503 F.Supp.2d 56, 68 (D.D.C.2007).

United Parcel Service, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

92 F.3d 1221 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 20, 1996

P 11,640 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, International Brotherhood of Teamsters and Teamsters UPS National Negotiating Committee, Intervenors. No. 95-1469. … SENTELLE, Circuit Judge: 1 Since at least 1947, the National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB" or "Board") has regulated the labor relations of United Parcel Service, Inc.

Padmanabhan v. Hulka

308 F. Supp. 3d 484 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 3, 2018

Goldstein v. Galvin , 719 F.3d 16 , 23 (1st Cir. 2013) (citing Kobrin v. Board of Registration in Med. , 444 Mass. 837 , 832 N.E.2d 628 (2005) ); see also *491 Airframe Sys., Inc. v. … Mead v. Indep. Ass'n , 684 F.3d 226 , 231 (1st Cir. 2012). Exclusive of such pronouncements, plaintiff's allegations against Browne are unavailing. *494 8.

Ward v. Califano

443 F. Supp. 89 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 12, 1977

Bell v. Brown, 557 F.2d 849 (D.C.Cir. May 20, 1977) and cases cited therein. … Early v. Klassen, 10 E.P.D. § 10,507 (D.D.C.1975).

Wilson and Sons Heating and Plumbing, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

971 F.2d 758 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 7, 1992

Local No. 455 v. … The Board relies heavily on the decision of the First Circuit in C.E.K. Industrial Mechanical Contractors, Inc. v.

Robert S. Dunning v. National Aeronautics and Space Administration

718 F.2d 1170 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 11, 1983

, see, e.g., Brown v. … . § 7701 (c)(2)(B); see Frazier v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 672 F.2d 150, 165 (D.C.Cir.1982). The Board’s finding that Dunning failed to meet that burden is supported by substantial evidence on the record.

Vk v. Child and Family Services Agency

14 A.3d 628 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 17, 2011

Moderwell & Co. v. … .”); State v.

International Union, United Mine Workers of America v. National Labor Relations Board

399 F.2d 977 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 2, 1968

We first considered the 80 cent clause in Lewis v. … Orange Belt District Council, etc. v. NLRB, 117 U.S.App.D.C. 233, 237-238 , 328 F.2d 534, 538-539 (1964). . Truck Drivers Union Local No. 413, etc. v. NLRB, 118 U.S.App.D.C. 149 , 158, 334 F.2d 539 , 548 (1964). .

United Food & Commercial Workers International Union v. National Labor Relations Board

852 F.2d 1344 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 2, 1988

Conair Corporation v. N.L.R.B., 721 F.2d 1355, 1386 (D.C.Cir. 1983). We enforce the Board’s order as entered by it. I. … Employees Div. v. N.L.R.B., 683 F.2d 305 (9th Cir.1982). Pursuant to a Board order, a representation election was held at the plant on October 9, 1981.

William v. Robbins v. George J. Reed, Chairman, United States Board of Parole

269 F.2d 242 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 2, 1959

In Fleming v. Tate, 81 U.S. … Tate and Moore v.

Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

345 F.2d 445 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 26, 1965

. v. … Corp. v. Civil Aero.

Communist Party of the United States of America v. Subversive Activities Control Board

223 F.2d 531 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 31, 1955

Board of Education 42 and Wieman v. … United States, 1913, 227 U.S. 131, 143-144 , 33 S.Ct. 226 , 57 L.Ed. 450 ; Brown v. Walker, 1896, 161 U.S. 591, 600 , 16 S.Ct. 644 , 40 L.Ed. 819 ; United States v.

Montship Lines, Limited v. Federal Maritime Board and the United States of America

295 F.2d 147 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 30, 1961

On October 31,1960, the Second Circuit upheld the Board’s order and denied Kerr’s petition. Kerr S. S. Co. v. United States, 284 F.2d 61 . … But we agree with petitioners that the Board’s consideration of these motions on their merits constituted a waiver of the Board’s own limitation period. Cf. Bowman v.

12 Percent Logistics, Inc. v. Unified Carrier Registration Plan Board

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 18, 2017

standard set forth in Winter v. … Office for Prot. & Advocacy v.

Evans v. FIRST MOUNT VERNON, ILA

786 F. Supp. 2d 347 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 24, 2011

v. … Club v.

Simon Boorda v. Subversive Activities Control Board, Robert Archuleta and Wayne Dallas Holley v. Subversive Activities Control Board

421 F.2d 1142 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 20, 1970

421 F.2d 1142 Simon BOORDA, Petitioner, v. SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES CONTROL BOARD, Respondent. Robert ARCHULETA and Wayne Dallas Holley, Petitioners, v. SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES CONTROL BOARD, Respondent. No. 22514. … See Keyishian v. Board of Regents, 385 U.S. 589, 606-607 , 87 S.Ct. 675 , 17 L.Ed.2d 629 (1967); Shelton v. Tucker, 364 U.S. 479, 488 , 81 S.Ct. 247 , 5 L.Ed.2d 231 (1960).

Dearsman v. Kurtz

516 F. Supp. 1255 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 26, 1981

Brown v. General Services Administration, 425 U.S. 820, 835 , 96 S.Ct. 1961, 1969 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976). … Having acknowledged that Brown is applicable to constitutional claims regarding discrimination, and having applied the rationale of Brown to the CSRA, it is only logical to also apply the rationale of Brown to the constitutional

Baptist Memorial Hospital-Golden Triangle v. Sebelius

566 F.3d 226 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 19, 2009

Brown v. Thompson, 374 F.3d 253, 259 (4th Cir. 2004) (A “change in statutory language need not ipso facto constitute a change in meaning or effect. … Power & Light Co. v.