Case law

Jadallah v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

476 A.2d 671 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 8, 1984

Hawkins v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, 381 A.2d 619, 622 (D.C.1977) (per curiam). … Kopff v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, 381 A.2d 1372, 1385-86 (D.C.1977); General Railway Signal Co. v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, 354 A.2d 529, 531 (D.C.1976); Wallace v.

Southland Manufacturing Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board

475 F.2d 414 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 16, 1973

The Board ordered the company to pay back pay and reinstate the discriminatees. That decision was affirmed by this court in United Hatters, Cap & Millinery Workers, International Union v. … See NLRB v. Rice Lake Creamery Co., 124 U.S.App.D.C. 355 , 365 F.2d 888 (1966); NLRB v. Mastro Plastics Corp., 354 F.2d 170 (2d Cir. 1965).

Vk v. Child and Family Services Agency

14 A.3d 628 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 17, 2011

Moderwell & Co. v. … .”); State v.

Thompson v. Pope

397 F. Supp. 2d 28 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 3, 2005

Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64, 67 (D.C.Cir.2003); Holy Land Found. for Relief & Development v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . … Warren, 353 F.3d at 39 ; Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . B.

Baptist Memorial Hospital-Golden Triangle v. Sebelius

566 F.3d 226 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 19, 2009

Brown v. Thompson, 374 F.3d 253, 259 (4th Cir. 2004) (A “change in statutory language need not ipso facto constitute a change in meaning or effect. … Power & Light Co. v.

White v. Reid

125 F. Supp. 647 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 23, 1954

Thomas v. United States, 1941, 74 App.D.C. 167 , 121 F.2d 905 ; Richardson v. Browning, 1927, 57 App.D.C. 186 , 18 F.2d 1008 ; Rule v. Geddes, 1904, 23 App.D.C. 31 . … Brown, 1928, 151 Miss. 398 , 118 So. 184 , 60 A.L.R. 1325 ; *650 Ex parte Daedler, 1924, 194 Cal. 320 , 228 P. 467 ; Cinque v.

Richardson v. Yellen

167 F. Supp. 3d 105 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 8, 2016

Baird v. Gotbaum, 792 F.3d 166 , 169 n. 2 (D.C.Cir.2015). The Court also considers the arguments and allegations in Mr. Richardson’s opposition memorandum. Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. … Ottenberg's Bakers, Inc., 999 F.Supp.2d 185, 190 (D.D.C.2013); Brown v. Corr. Corp. of Am., 603 F.Supp.2d 73, 78 (D.D.C.2009); Hardy v. District of Columbia, 601 F.Supp.2d 182, 187 (D.D.C.2009); Jenkins v.

Nicholas County Health Care Center, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

13 F. App'x 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 8, 2001

This appeal was considered on the record from the National Labor Relations Board and on the briefs of the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for oral argument. See D.C.Cir. … It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the petition for review be denied and the Board’s application for enforcement be granted substantially for the reasons given by the Board.

Joseph L. Jones v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

79 F.3d 1168 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 26, 1996

See Irving Bank Corp. v. Board of Governors of the Fed. Reserve Sys., 845 F.2d 1035, 1039 (D.C.Cir.1988); Investment Co. Inst. v. Board of Governors of the Fed. … Board of Governors of the Fed. Reserve Sys., 537 F.2d 1146, 1147 (1st Cir.1976); Bank of Commerce v. Board of Governors of the Fed. Reserve *1171 Sys., 513 F.2d 164, 166-67 (10th Cir.1975); First Nat’l Bank v.

Boone v. MOUNTAINMADE FOUNDATION

684 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 15, 2010

Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64, 67 (D.C.Cir.2003); Holy Land Found, for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . … Warren v. District of Columbia, 353 F.3d 36, 40 (D.C.Cir.2004); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . “Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements, do not suffice.”

Citizens Protective League v. Clark

155 F.2d 290 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 2, 1946

(d). 6 National War Labor Board v. Montgomery Ward & Co., 1944, 79 U.S.App. … Schwarzkopf v. Uhl, 2 Cir., 1943, 137 F.2d 898 . 16 Brown v. United States, 1814, 8 Cranch 110 , 3 L.Ed. 504 ; De Lacey v. United States, 9 Cir., 1918, 249 F. 625 , L.R.A.1918E, 1011; Grahl v.

Burns v. Lovett

104 F. Supp. 312 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 31, 1952

As' stated in the memorandum opinion in the case of Dennis v. Lovett, D. … Hiatt v. Brown, 339 U.S. 103 , 70 S.Ct. 495 , 94 L.Ed. 691 , decided March 13, 1950.

McKenzie-Willamette Regional Medical Center Associates, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board

671 F. App'x 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 22, 2016

The company claims the Board appointed Hooks on January 6, 2012, at which time it lacked a *2 quorum. See N.L.R.B. v. Noel Canning, — U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 2550, 2557, 2578 , 189 L.Ed.2d 538 (2014). … The Administrative Law Judge, in a decision the Board adopted, took official notice of the certificate. In light of that document, the Board determined—with ample support, see, e.g., Marbury v.

Road Sprinkler Fitters Local Union No. 669 v. National Labor Relations Board

637 F. App'x 611 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 10, 2016

Nova Plumbing, Inc. v. NLRB, 330 F.3d 531, 539 (D.C.Cir.2003); accord Brennan Sand & Gravel Co., 289 N.L.R.B. 977 , 979 (1988). … Our review is confined to the reasons given by the Board. See, e.g., Macmillan Publishing Co. v.

Road Sprinkler Fitters Local Union No. 669 v. National Labor Relations Board

637 F. App'x 613 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 10, 2016

Nova Plumbing, Inc. v. NLRB, 330 F.3d 531, 539 (D.C.Cir.2003); accord Brennan Sand & Gravel Co., 289 N.L.R.B. 977 , 979 (1988). … Our review is confined to the reasons given by the Board. See, e.g., Macmillan Publishing Co. v.

No. 90-1503

949 F.2d 441 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 29, 1991

The choice between rulemaking and adjudication is up to the Board. See NLRB v. … NLRB v.

International Longshoremen's Association v. National Labor Relations Board

277 F.2d 681 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 28, 1960

Connolly, its Executive Vice President and Chairman of its Wage Scale Committee, Atlantic Coast District, Petitioners, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. No. 14985. … I would dismiss the petition for review as moot. 1 See Douds v. International Longshoremen's Ass'n, Independent, 147 F.Supp. 103 (D.C.S.D.N.Y.1956), affirmed 241 F.2d 278 (2 Cir., 1957) 2 Labor Board v.

Philip E. Forest v. Stanley R. Resor, Secretary of the Army

379 F.2d 881 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 20, 1967

That trial itself was envisaged by Congress as taking place before the Board of Inquiry, and explicit provision was made for a “fair and impartial” hearing. Brown v. … See Harmon v. Brucker, 355 U.S. 579 , 78 S.Ct. 433 , 2 L.Ed.2d 503 (1958).

North American Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, American Airlines, Inc., Intervenor

228 F.2d 432 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 23, 1955

United Air Lines v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 7 Cir., 1952, 198 F.2d 100, 105 . … United Air Lines v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 1946, 81 U.S.App.D.C. 89, 91 , 155 F.2d 169, 171 .

Richardson v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 26, 2018

In Federal Aviation Administration v. … Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 246 (D.C. Cir. 2002) (discussing “special damages” under Rule 9(g) in a non-Privacy Act context) (internal citations omitted); see also Welborn, 218 F.