Case law

Buda Co. v. Industrial Commission

377 Ill. 215 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 17, 1941

There is evidence which shows sand dust in the room where he was employed in such quantities that exposure in his employment to the hazard of silicosis is clearly established. … The four who qualified as physicians and medical experts each made a personal examination of Kut.

People v. Johnson

2011 IL 111817 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 1, 2011

. ¶ 11 Section 5-4-3(k)(1) establishes a State Offender DNA Identification System Fund (Fund), “a special fund in the State Treasury.” 730 ILCS 5/5-4-3(k)(1) (West 2008). … App. 3d at 919). ¶ 19 Marshall establishes, first, that the DNA analysis charge clearly is compensatory.

People v. Adams

198 Ill. App. 3d 74 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jun 5, 1990

As such, the registration requirement at issue here clearly serves a legitimate governmental purpose. … In doing so, we are mindful that legislative enactments carry a strong presumption of constitutionality, and the party challenging the statute has the burden of clearly establishing its invalidity. (People v.

In Re Ocean Bank

481 F. Supp. 2d 892 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 16, 2007

Further, despite the lack of any credential or experience that would qualify him to say so, Mr. … Connelly refers to here as “we,” but Ocean Bank has not established that he is qualified to offer testimony on the meaning of the law.

Michigan Avenue National Bank v. County of Cook

306 Ill. App. 3d 392 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jun 30, 1999

No evidentiary facts established that fibrocystic disease was treatable or that any of the defendant medical professionals had undertaken treatment of that condition on October 22, 1986. … Finally, the legislature used the words "undertaken to prescribe" in subsection (c), and "administering any treatment" in subsection (d). 745 ILCS 10/6-106 (c), (d) (West 1996) The legislature's use of such language clearly

Dunnigan v. Ellis

162 Ill. App. 185 · Appellate Court of Illinois · May 26, 1911

O’Connors et al., ante, p. 108, fully sets forth the requirements necessary to be established in cases of this character and clearly distinguishes between actions brought by reason of injuries caused by an intoxicated person … The witness qualified and was competent to testify as an expert, and it was for the jury to determine the weight to be given to his testimony.

Ferguson v. Ryan

251 Ill. App. 3d 1042 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Nov 19, 1993

committeeman of another established political party; 3. a judge of election pursuant to Article 13 or 14 of The Election Code for another established political party; 4. a voter who voted in the primary election of another … established political party.”

Taylor v. State Universities Retirement System

203 Ill. App. 3d 513 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jul 12, 1990

SURS contended Taylor was seeking a money judgment against the State, in violation of the doctrine of sovereign immunity. … SUES maintains a circuit court money judgment against SUES, in the amount of the fees which Taylor claims, would violate the doctrine of sovereign immunity.

Clark Oil & Refining Corp. v. Golden

114 Ill. App. 3d 300 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Apr 22, 1983

Opinion Plaintiff first contends that defendant failed to establish a prima facie case of race discrimination. … In each case, the complainant must present evidence that he was qualified for the position in question.

Advincula v. United Blood Services

Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1996

We find that information in ABRA's brief that provides background to the Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) crisis essentially appears within the record on appeal and within the parties' briefs. … Curran, Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) Associated with Transfusions, 310 New Eng. J. Med. 69, 70 (1984); Kozop, 663 F. Supp. at 1052 .

Slezak v. Girzadas

167 Ill. App. 3d 1045 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Mar 8, 1988

The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred by refusing to qualify plaintiff’s expert witness as a medical expert on the ground that he had failed to establish that he was familiar with the community standards … Laskin clearly indicated his familiarity with the Zimmer plate surgical procedure and testified as to the similarity of standard of care between New York and Chicago.

Arnold v. County of Cook

220 F. Supp. 2d 893 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 11, 2002

Every accommodation is in some sense a preference, but the ADA clearly requires accommodation in some circumstances. The question is not whether, but when. … II To establish a reasonable accommodation claim, Arnold must show that he was a “qualified individual with a disability,” which is defined as an “individual with a disability who, with or without reasonable accommodation

Venner v. Chicago City Railway Co.

246 Ill. 170 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 29, 1910

There is nothing in the law. of 1859 that would prohibit the establishment and maintenance of its principal office in a foreign State or country. … It cannot, we think, be seriously contended that the State ever intended that x corporations chartered by our legislature should enjoy such complete immunity from the'visitorial powers of the State as would result if the

Board of Education of the City of Chicago v. Illinois Educational Labor Relations Board

2015 IL 118043 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 25, 2016

In resolving a mixed question of law and fact, a reviewing court must determine whether established facts satisfy applicable legal rules. … If the IELRB did not clearly err on that point, we must consider whether it clearly erred in finding the grievances arbitrable under section 10(b) of the Act.

People v. C.B.

308 Ill. App. 3d 227 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Oct 19, 1999

The State contends that section 2 — 18 (4) (a) of the Juvenile Court Act is immune from the requirement that writings speak for themselves based upon language contained in the statute that states, “All other circumstances … We cannot say that the opposite conclusion is clearly evident from the record or that the trial court’s conclusion is unreasonable, arbitrary, and not based on the evidence presented.

People v. George O.

314 Ill. App. 3d 1044 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jul 26, 2000

The State conversely maintains that (1) the circuit court’s order was proper, as clear and convincing evidence established by Dr. … We, therefore, decline to apply waiver in this case, since the State’s failure to comply with section 3 — 610 appears on the face of the record and clearly prejudiced George O.

People v. Miller

20 Ill. App. 3d 1061 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jul 3, 1974

Whether one not qualified as an expert may given an opinion on the identity of fingerprints. b. Whether the court erred in admitting hearsay to establish the identity of the fingerprints in People’s Exhibit #3. c. … Whether the trial court committed plain error in admitting into evidence a police booking card which clearly indicated prior criminal activity by the defendant. 3.

Marshall v. Industrial Commission

342 Ill. 400 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 18, 1930

Dependency is established when it is shown that the claimant relied upon the deceased for his of her means of living. … In this case the evidence clearly shows that the claimant relied on the contributions of deceased for half her livelihood, and dependency is thus established.

Northern Trust Co. v. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co.

43 Ill. App. 3d 169 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Oct 13, 1976

The Chicago Foundation was, in fact, a qualified charitable organization under section 501(c)(3). … Here, the trustees clearly exercised their discretion by nominating various charities for grants.

Salaymeh v. St. Vincent Memorial Hospital Corp.

706 F. Supp. 643 · District Court, C.D. Illinois · Feb 22, 1989

Immunity Defendant asserts that it is entitled to summary judgment based on an Illinois statute which provides immunity for hospitals and individuals against civil liability for their actions in the peer review process. … In conclusion, we are clearly persuaded that Defendant must prevail.