Case law

SAIF Corp. v. DeLeon

241 Or. App. 614 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 23, 2011

We agree with SAIF that ORS 656.382(2), as interpreted by this court in Santos v. Caryall Transport, 171 Or App 467, 469 , 17 P3d 509 (2000), rev den, 332 Or 558 (2001) (Santos II), and SAIF v. … Claimant appealed the ALJ’s order to the Workers’ Compensation Board, and the board reversed the ALJ, reinstating the 11 percent award.

Hoffmire v. Martin

29 Or. 240 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 27, 1896

Anderson, 96 Ill. 372 ; Prutsman v. Baker, 30 Wis. 644 ( 11 Am. Rep. 592 ); Brown v. Brown, 66 Me. 316 ; Cook v. Brown , 34 N. H. 460; Williams v. Schatz, 42 Ohio St. 47 ; Provart v. Harriss, 150 Ill. 40 ( 36 N. … To the same effect are Lang v. Smith, 36 W. Va. 734 ( 17 S. E. 213 ); Stephens v. Rinehart, 72 Pa. St. 434; Reed v. Douthit, 62 Ill. 348 ; Hathaway v. Payne, 34 N. Y. 92 ; Wheelwright v.

Webb v. HIGHWAY DIV. OF OREGON STATE

293 Or. 645 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 19, 1982

In Urban Renewal Agency v. … We decided Brown v. Portland School District §1, 291 Or 77 , 628 P2d 1183 (1981) after the trial court granted summary judgment in the present case, construing the same statute.

Borg v. Department of Revenue

11 Or. Tax 67 · Oregon Tax Court · Aug 12, 1988

Dept. of Treas., 155 Mich App 778 , 401 NW2d 62 (1986); Comm. of Rev. v. Plymouth Home National Bank, 394 Mass 66, 473 NE2d 1139 (1985). As the court found in Brown v. … Memphis Bank & Trust Co. v. Garner, supra.

State v. Jacobson

80 Or. 648 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 6, 1916

Rep. 592); Walling v. Michigan, 116 U. S. 446 ( 29 L. Ed. 691 , 6 Sup. Ct. Rep. 454); Welton v. Missouri, 91 U. S. 275 ( 23 L. Ed. 347 ); Cooley v. Board of Wardens, 12 How. 299 ( 13 L. Ed. 996 ); Brown v. … In State v.

Torres v. SAIF

321 Or. App. 408 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 24, 2022

When reviewing the board’s evaluation of medical opinions, “we do not substitute our judgment for that of the board”; we determine only whether the board’s evaluation was reasonable. SAIF v. … Corkum v. Bi-Mart Corp., 271 Or App 411, 422, 350 P3d 585 (2015); Murdoch v.

Kelley v. Sisters of Providence in Oregon

98 Or. App. 684 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 11, 1989

See Patton v. J. C. … See Sheets v. Knight, 308 Or 220 , 779 P2d 1000 (1989).

Haskins v. Palmateer

186 Or. App. 159 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 5, 2003

Byrnes v. Board of Parole, 134 Or App 296, 300 , 894 P2d 1252 (1995). … City of Klamath Falls v. Environ. Quality Comm., 318 Or 532, 543 , 870 P2d 825 (1994). Thus, we decline to read such a term into the board’s rules.

Cabler v. Alexander

111 Or. 257 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 22, 1924

The court, in the case of Martin v. Hughes, 67 N. … Brown, Rand and Coshow, JJ., concur.

Medford Firefighters Ass'n, Local 1431 v. City of Medford

43 Or. App. 733 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 24, 1979

See, e.g., Hinson v. NLRB, 428 F2d 133, 136 (8th Cir 1970). The termination date of the agreement, however, is now res judicata. Medford Firefighters v. … Cf., McPherson v. Employment Division, 285 Or 541, 550 , 591 P2d 1381 (1979); Springfield Education Assn v. School Dist., 42 Or App 93 , 600 P2d 425 (1979).

Miles v. Bi-Mart Corp.

316 Or. App. 481 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 22, 2021

Additionally, the board’s reasoning must provide a rational explanation of the factual findings that lead to the legal conclusions on which the order is based. NAES Corp. v. … Norpac Foods, Inc. v. Gilmore, 318 Or 363, 366, 867 P2d 1373 (1994).

State v. MacOmber

18 Or. App. 163 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 22, 1974

When defense counsel moved to require tlie state to elect, he relied upon State v. Brown, supra. … Brown, supra, and State v. Woolard, supra.

State v. Wiltse

373 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 7, 2024

Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc., 312 Or 376, 381-82, 823 P2d 956 (1991) (citing State v. Brown, 310 Or 347, 355-56, 800 P2d 259 (1990)). … State v. Lyon, 304 Or 221, 233, 744 P2d 231 (1987) (citing State v. Brown, 297 Or 404, 440-41, 687 P2d 751 (1984)).

State v. McCoy

152 Or. App. 393 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 4, 1998

State v. Brown, 310 Or 347, 355 , 800 P2d 259 (1990). That requirement is not met here. … Brown, 310 Or at 355 . Affirmed.

State v. Briggs

45 Or. 366 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 1, 1904

: Barmore v. … State Board of Medical Examiners, 21 Or. 301 ( 28 Pac. 8 ); People ex rel. v. Dental Examiners, 110 Ill. 180 .

State v. Terry

333 Or. 163 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 28, 2001

State v. Thompson, 328 Or 248, 250 , 971 P2d 879 (1999). On August 6, 1994, Jeffrey Brown (Jeff) invited defendant to celebrate the birthday of Jeffs brother Dale Brown (Dale). … Brown would result.

State v. Wheeler

268 Or. App. 729 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 4, 2015

See ORAP 5.45(1) (authorizing appellate court to consider unpreserved error of law apparent on the record); State v. … Brown, 310 Or 347, 355 , 800 P2d 259 (1990) (describing requirements for plain-error review under ORAP 5.45(1)).

Arms v. SAIF Corp.

268 Or. App. 761 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 4, 2015

If that is the board’s finding, it is not supported by substantial evidence and reason. As we explained in Luckhurst v. … See also SAIF v.

Young v. Hermiston Good Samaritan

223 Or. App. 99 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 15, 2008

In SAIF v. … In White v.

Application of Shrewsbury

52 Or. App. 81 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 5, 1981

In some respects, the situation resembles that involved in Penrod/Brown v. … See Peters v. Renfro, 43 Or App 411 , 602 P2d 1137 (1979).