Case law

Achagzai v. Broad. Bd. of Governors

308 F. Supp. 3d 396 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 20, 2018

See Ng v. … Lahood , 919 F.Supp.2d 93 , 101-02 (D.D.C. 2013) (same); Brown v. Georgetown Univ. Hosp.

Truck Drivers Union Local No. 413, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America v. National Labor Relations Board, Truck Drivers & Helpers Local Union No. 728, International Brotherhood Ofteamsters v. National Labor Relations Board, Watson-Wilson Transportationsystem, Inc., Intervenors

334 F.2d 539 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 16, 1964

See National Labor Relations Board v. … Employing Lithographers of Greater Miami v. N.L.R.B., supra, at 24-27 of 301 F.2d; N.L.R.B. v. Amalgamated Lithographers of America (Ind.), supra, at 45 of 309 F.2d; Brown v.

Sandoval v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

93 A.3d 678 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 26, 2014

Hosp. v. … District of Columbia Dep’t of Emp’t Servs., 960 A.2d 603 , 606 (D.C.2008) (“we acknowledge [DOES’s] expertise and ... responsibility for administering the Workers’ Compensation Act”); see generally, e.g., Brown v.

Sellmon v. Reilly

561 F. Supp. 2d 46 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 20, 2008

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). That is all that Phillips has offered here. … Moreover, Phillips’s unsupported characterization. of the Parole Board’s practice prior to 1987 is insufficient under the D.C. Circuit’s precedent in Fletcher v.

Sheet Metal Workers International Ass'n, Local 270 v. National Labor Relations Board

561 F.3d 497 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 3, 2009

Express Corp. v. Mineta, 373 F.3d 112, 118 (D.C. Cir. 2004) (quoting Abbott Labs. v. Gardner, 387 U.S. 136, 149 (1967)). … Cir. 2006) (contrasting NLRB v.

Hobson Ex Rel. Hobson v. Hansen

269 F. Supp. 401 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 19, 1967

So it was in Brown v. Board of Education, Bolling v. Sharpe, and Baker v. Carr. So it is in the South where federal courts are making brave attempts to implement the mandate of Brown . So it is here. … Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483, 493 , 74 S.Ct. 686 (1954). 156 . See Dowell v. School Board, W.D.Okl., 244 F.Supp. 971, 976 (1965), affirmed, sub nom. Board of Ed. of Oklahoma City, etc. v.

Textile Workers Union Of America, Afl-Cio, Petitioner v. National Labor Relations Board

294 F.2d 738 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 27, 1961

294 F.2d 738 TEXTILE WORKERS UNION OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, Roselle Shoe Corporation, Harry A. … should have been heard on whether or not the Board should enter the order. 4 In Marine Engineers' Beneficial Ass'n v.

Eldon E. Kuhns v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

930 F.2d 39 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 12, 1991

Charter Management, Inc. v. NLRB, 768 F.2d 1299, 1301 (11th Cir.1985); see also Wilkett v. ICC, 844 F.2d 867, 871 (D.C.Cir.1988). … The Supreme Court in Pierce v.

Food Store Employees Union, Local 347 v. National Labor Relations Board

419 F.2d 719 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 6, 1969

’s motion for remand be granted and’ these cases with respect to the Board’s orders relating to the Company’s refusal to bargain with the Union, that is, Section 8(a) (5) and (1) of the Act, are remanded to the Board for … reconsideration in conformity with the principles outlined in N.L.R.B. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. National Ass'n of Broadcast Employees & Technicians

631 F.2d 944 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 23, 1980

The Supreme Court and this Court have emphasized that it is a primary function and responsibility of the Board “to resolve the conflicting interests that Congress has recognized in its labor legislation.” NLRB v. … For this reason, courts are to give deference to the Board’s statutory construction. NLRB v. Local 103, International Association of Iron Workers, 434 U.S. 335, 350 , 98 S.Ct. 651, 660 , 54 L.Ed.2d 586 (1978).

LOCAL UNION NO. 112, INT. U. ALLIED INDUS. WKRS. v. Rothman

209 F. Supp. 295 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 9, 1962

209 F.Supp. 295 (1962) LOCAL UNION NO. 112, INTERNATIONAL UNION ALLIED INDUSTRIAL WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, Plaintiff, v. Stuart ROTHMAN, General Counsel of the National Labor Relations Board, Frank W. … Brown, Members, National Labor Relations Board, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 929-62. United States District Court District of Columbia. October 9, 1962. David Previant, Milwaukee, Wis., for plaintiff; Herbert S.

ACOTT VENTURES, LLC T/A SHADOW ROOM v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL BOARD

135 A.3d 80 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 17, 2016

Dyas v. … See Bardoff v.

Stanley Siegel v. Juanita M. Kreps, Individually and as Secretary of the United States Department of Commerce

654 F.2d 773 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 13, 1981

Appellant relies on such decisions as Coles v. Penny, 174 U.S.App.D.C. 277 , 531 F.2d 609 (D.C.Cir.1976); Bell v. Brown, 181 U.S.App.D.C. 226 , 557 F.2d 849 (1977); and Laffey v. … Brown v. General Services Administration, supra; Bunch v. United States, 548 F.2d 336, 340 (9th Cir. 1977); Meisch v. U. S.

John Stanton v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals

127 F.3d 72 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 3, 1997

See Brown v. … Carey v. Brown, 447 U.S. 455 , 100 S.Ct. 2286 , 65 L.Ed.2d 263 (1980); Mustfov v. Superintendent of Chicago Police Dep’t, 733 F.Supp. 283, 292 (N.D.Ill.1990); Maynard v.

Board of Regents of University of Washington v. Environmental Protection Agency

86 F.3d 1214 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 25, 1996

See Kent County v. EPA, 963 F.2d 391, 393 (1992). … Co. v.

Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union v. National Labor Relations Board

445 F.2d 237 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 27, 1971

In NLRB v. … The Board, however, had studiously avoided holding one way or the other on the question. When, in Packard Motor Car Co. v.

Thompson v. Pope

397 F. Supp. 2d 28 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 3, 2005

Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64, 67 (D.C.Cir.2003); Holy Land Found. for Relief & Development v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . … Warren, 353 F.3d at 39 ; Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . B.

Road Sprinkler Fitters Local Union No. 669 v. National Labor Relations Board

637 F. App'x 611 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 10, 2016

Nova Plumbing, Inc. v. NLRB, 330 F.3d 531, 539 (D.C.Cir.2003); accord Brennan Sand & Gravel Co., 289 N.L.R.B. 977 , 979 (1988). … Our review is confined to the reasons given by the Board. See, e.g., Macmillan Publishing Co. v.

Jadallah v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

476 A.2d 671 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 8, 1984

Hawkins v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, 381 A.2d 619, 622 (D.C.1977) (per curiam). … Kopff v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, 381 A.2d 1372, 1385-86 (D.C.1977); General Railway Signal Co. v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, 354 A.2d 529, 531 (D.C.1976); Wallace v.

Ramos v. District of Columbia Department of Consumer & Regulatory Affairs

601 A.2d 1069 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 9, 1992

For example, in Brown v. … The Brown case has a rather tortuous subsequent history, none of which relates directly to the principle for which we cite it here. See Brown v.