Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filters1788

10,000+ results

4.76s

  • Meals v. City of Memphis, Tennessee

    493 F.3d 720 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 11, 2007

    Under the doctrine of qualified immunity, “government officials performing discretionary functions, generally are shielded from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory … If the plaintiff fails to establish any one of these elements, qualified immunity must be granted. Radvansky v.

    Cited 90 timesPublished
  • Eng v. Cooley

    552 F.3d 1062 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 14, 2009

    If a plaintiffs constitutional rights were not clearly established at the time of the violation, then qualified immunity should be granted. 2. Whether Eng’s Rights Were Clearly Established a. … established’ to preclude qualified immunity.”

    Cited 322 timesPublished
  • Walker v. Corizon Health

    947 F.3d 1244 · Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · Jan 14, 2020

    This court may choose to address either of the two qualified-immunity requirements first because, if “the plaintiff fails to establish either prong of the two-pronged qualified immunity standard, the defendant prevails on … immunity, the complaint must allege specific facts showing each defendant violated the defendant’s clearly established constitutional rights).

    Cited 106 timesPublished
  • Sabir v. District of Columbia

    755 A.2d 449 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 22, 2000

    Absent violation of “a clearly established right,”a police officer will not be subject to § 1983 liability. Id. at 1015. As the D.C. Circuit articulated the standard in Wardlaw v. … Generally, the review of a deniál of qualified immunity is a question of law — “whether the legal norms allegedly violated by the defendant were clearly established at the time of the challenged actions.” Mitchell v.

    Cited 39 timesPublished
  • Henry H. Cunningham v. City of Wenatchee, and Robert R. Perez

    345 F.3d 802 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 3, 2003

    The Court observed: Unless the plaintiffs allegations state a claim of violation of clearly established law, a defendant pleading qualified immunity is entitled to dismissal before the commencement of discovery. … Qualified Immunity We review de novo Perez’s qualified immunity claim. Mena v. City of Simi Valley, 226 F.3d 1031, 1036 (9th Cir.2000).

    Cited 107 timesPublished
  • Aluizio v. Van Kanegan

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 8, 2025

    Qualified Immunity Van Kanegan argues he is entitled to qualified immunity because Aulizio cannot establish a violation of any clearly established constitutional right. … “The doctrine of qualified immunity provides that ‘government officials performing discretionary functions generally are shielded from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Eilenfeldt ex rel. J.M. v. United C.U.S.D. 304 Board of Education

    169 F. Supp. 3d 867 · District Court, C.D. Illinois · Mar 14, 2016

    Qualified Immunity The doctrine of qualified immunity protects government officials from civil liability for their actions in the course of their duties “insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory … However, once a claim of qualified immunity has been raised, a plaintiff also bears the burden of demonstrating the violation of a clearly established constitutional right of which a reasonable person would have known.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Cantrell v. DeKalb County

    78 S.W.3d 902 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 3, 2001

    The Qualified Immunity Defense The dispositive issue for this appeal is whether the law enforcement officials have presented undisputed facts demonstrating that they are entitled to qualified immunity as a matter of law. … Cantrell’s clearly established rights. ■ 1. Mr. Cantrell’s Free Exercise Rights Mr. Cantrell, like all persons, possesses certain clearly established rights with regard to the practice of his religion.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Petzak v. Nevada Ex Rel. Department of Corrections

    579 F. Supp. 2d 1330 · District Court, D. Nevada · Sep 23, 2008

    Dobel’s motion (# 18) for summary judgment raises only the issue of qualified immunity. A. Qualified Immunity and Money Damages Qualified immunity is a valid defense for a public official in an action for damages. … right in question was clearly established in the specific context of the case.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Mohammad Siddique v. Michael Laliberte

    972 F.3d 898 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Aug 26, 2020

    We elect to resolve this case on the second part of the qualified immunity test—whether the right was clearly established. This appeal, in its current iteration, involves only a First Amendment retaliation claim. … No such clearly established law exists.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Plummer v. Department of Corrections

    305 N.J. Super. 365 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 25, 1997

    reasonable, thereby entitling them to qualified immunity as a matter of law. … However, the fact that the law at issue is clearly established will not deprive these defendants from the qualified immunity defense if, in light of the specific facts known to them, they could reasonably believe that probable

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Ritchie v. Turner

    559 S.W.3d 822 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 1, 2018

    Recognizing that these actions were clearly discretionary in nature, we held the kindergarten teacher in Turner was entitled to qualified official immunity. Id. at 878 . In Patton v. … As to the objective reasonableness test, Doe has not met her burden to show a violation of a constitutional, statutory, or other clearly established right.

    Cited 49 timesPublished
  • Greiner v. City of Champlin

    816 F. Supp. 528 · District Court, D. Minnesota · Mar 9, 1993

    Moreover, plaintiffs argue that because a reasonable officer would have known that the orders to leave the party violated clearly established constitutional rights, qualified immunity is not available. … Defendants argue that none of the arrests violated plaintiffs’ clearly established constitutional rights and therefore qualified immunity applies.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Noyes v. Moccia, et al.

    District Court, D. New Hampshire · Jun 24, 1999

    Under the doctrine of qualified immunity, "government officials performing discretionary functions generally are shielded from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established … would violate plaintiff's clearly established constitutional rights.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Clancy v. McCabe

    441 Mass. 311 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Mar 26, 2004

    McCabe moved for summary judgment, claiming he was entitled to qualified immunity. … The doctrine of qualified immunity shields government officials, in the course of performing discretionary tasks, from liability for civil damages “insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Galante v. County of Nassau

    186 Misc. 2d 733 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 12, 2000

    if either (1) their conduct did not violate clearly established rights of which a reasonable person would have known, or (2) it was objectively reasonable to believe that [their] acts did not violate these clearly established … [their] acts [do] not violate these clearly established rights.’ ” (Tenenbaum, at 596.)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Anderson v. Furst

    District Court, E.D. Michigan · Mar 20, 2020

    further inquiries concerning qualified immunity. … Thereafter, the burden shifts to the plaintiff to establish that the defendant's conduct violated a right so clearly established that any official in his position would have clearly understood he was under an

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Sinaloa Lake Owners Ass'n v. City of Simi Valley

    70 F.3d 1095 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 30, 1995

    While the right to due process is “clearly established” by the Due Process Clause, this level of generality was not intended to satisfy the qualified immunity standard. … that the law was clearly established, Doody was nonetheless entitled to qualified immunity because “a reasonable dam safety engineering official, similarly situated, could have believed breaching the dam was lawful.”

    Cited 48 timesPublished
  • Jim Nahas v. Polk County, Iowa

    Supreme Court of Iowa · Jun 9, 2023

    The “clearly established” standard is thus inherently backward-looking. … Further, whether the law was clearly established is inextricably intertwined with the new qualified immunity defense and only relevant to this case to the extent the new qualified immunity defense is operative in this

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Wilhoit v. Seay

    248 S.W.3d 135 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 24, 2008

    Again, both Jones and Walker are public officials entitled to qualified immunity unless their immunity was lost through conduct violating a clearly established statutory or constitutional right of which a reasonable person … Wood, therefore, has failed to allege facts that adequately prove that Jones and Walker lost their qualified immunity by violating a clearly established statutory or constitutional right.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.