Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
9,550 results
2.64s
18 F. Cas. 751 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 15, 1823
The Atlantic remained with the rum on board in the place where she received it, three or four days, taking in a cargo of gypsum, when, having completed her cargo and got ready for sea, and the rum remaining on board undisposed … Kirkland v. The Fame [Case No. 7,845].
Cited 1 timesPublished958 A.2d 887 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 4, 2008
v. … .”); Lewien v.
Cited 15 timesPublishedBrotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes v. Guilford Transportation Industries, Inc.
808 F. Supp. 46 · District Court, D. Maine · Dec 9, 1992
Relying on NLRB v. … Air Transport Employees v.
Cited 0 timesPublished544 A.2d 1290 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 29, 1988
State v. Drown, 447 A.2d 466, 471 (Me.1982). … State v. Howes, 432 A.2d 419, 423 (Me.1981).
Cited 7 timesPublished113 Me. 324 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 20, 1915
Libby v. Brown, 78 Maine, 492; Townsend Bank v. Whitney, 3 Allen, 455 . But the plaintiff contends that the decedent’s possession of the notes at the time of her death is prima facie evidence that she paid them. … In McGee v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedCity of Lewiston v. Lincoln Street Associates
573 A.2d 29 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 19, 1990
Webb appealed to the board of appeals, which affirmed the planning board’s decision. … Inc. v. The Bank Josephine, 558 S.W.2d 597, 598-99 (Ky.1977).
Cited 0 timesPublished101 Me. 124 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 5, 1906
Herrman v. Merchants Ins. Co., 81 N. Y. 184 ; Allen et al. v. St. Louis Ins. Co., 85 N. Y. 473 ; Rann et al. exrs. v. The Home Ins. Co., 59 N. Y. 387 ; Hoffman v. Aetna Fire Ins. Co., 32 N. Y. 405 ; 1 May on Ins., (3rd. … Day v. Mut. Ben. L. Ins. Co., 1 MacArthur (D. C.) 41; Hartford F. Ins. Co. v. Walsh, 54 Ill. 164 ; Withered v. Maine Ins. Co., 49 Maine, 200; Aurora F. & M. Ins. Co. v. Kranich, 36 Mich. 288 .
Cited 6 timesPublished29 F. Cas. 1303 · District Court, D. Maine · Apr 17, 1837
Malone v. Bell [Case No. 8,994]; Jones v. The Phœnix [Id. 7,489]. The same principle has been adopted by the district court of Massachusetts. Dunl. Adm. Prac. 245. … Wilson v. The Mary [Case No. 17,823], The third charge is for the expense of the survey called by the crew.
Cited 0 timesPublished131 Me. 280 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 20, 1932
Spiller v. Close, 110 Me., 302, 86 A., 173 ; Laughlin v. Eaton, 54 Me., 156; Ballard v. Russell, 33 Me., 196. … Morrison v. Brown, 84 Me., 82, 24 A., 672 ; Hobbs v. Hobbs, 70 Me., 383. “It relates to cases when, by the very assumption, the hunsband may be a party with the wife, or not, at her election.” Hobbs v.
Cited 23 timesPublishedSabattus School Committee v. Department of Education
644 A.2d 1380 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 21, 1994
International Paper Co. v. Board of Envtl. Protection, 629 A.2d 597, 599 (Me.1993). I. … Gulick v. Board of Envtl. Protection, 452 A.2d 1202, 1207-08 (Me.1982). Under this standard, a factual finding will be set aside as clearly erroneous only if there is no competent evidence in the record, to support it.
Cited 2 timesPublished29 F. Cas. 266 · District Court, D. Maine · Sep 15, 1847
In the spring of 1S34, Warren and Brown formed a partnership for carrying on the business of attorneys and counselors at law. … It was not long, however, before the name of the firm was freely used in these land securities; at first, it seems, by Brown, but not objected to by Warren.
Cited 1 timesPublishedCatlin v. Maine, Bureau of Taxation (In Re Sheldon's Inc. of Maine)
28 B.R. 568 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · Mar 28, 1983
California State Board of Equalization v. … Id.; California State Board of Equalization v. Goggin, 191 F.2d 726 (9th Cir.1951), cert denied, 342 U.S. 909 , 72 S.Ct. 302 , 96 L.Ed. 680 (1952); Babb v.
Cited 6 timesPublished8 L.R.A. 448 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 11, 1889
Com. part V, c. 35, § 2; Blades v. Higgs, 11, H. L. 621. … Union State Co. v. Tilton, 69 Maine, 244; Adams v. McGlinchy, 66 Maine, 474; Craig v. Gilbreth, 47 Maine, 416; Brown v. Ware, 25 Maine, 411; Burke v. Savage, 13 Allen, 408 ; Magee v. Scott, 9 Cush. 148 ; Armory v.
Cited 10 timesPublished144 Me. 370 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 5, 1949
Rogers v. Brown, 134 Me. 88 ; 181 Atl. 667 . If the writ issues, the court at nisi prius has the jurisdiction to decide what should be done. R. S. (1944), Chap. 116, Sec. 14. … Tuttle v. Lang, supra; Comm. v. Dowdican’s Bail, 115 Mass. 133,136 ; People v. Court of Sessions, 141 N. Y., 288 ; 36 N. E. 386 ; 23 L. R. A. 856.
Cited 3 timesPublished521 A.2d 718 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 2, 1987
See Townsend v. Dollison, 66 Ohio St.2d 225 , 421 N.E.2d 146 (1981); State v. Wenof, 102 N.J.Super. 370 , 246 A.2d 59 (1968). … Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank and Trust Co., 339 U.S. 306, 314-15 , 70 S.Ct. 652, 657-658 , 94 L.Ed. 865 (1949). See also Mennonite Board of Missions v.
Cited 9 timesPublished113 Me. 282 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 5, 1915
See also High’s Extraordinary Legal Remedies, Sec. 24; Wood on Mandamus, Page 19; extensive note to Dane v. Derby, (54 Maine, 95) found in 89 Am. Dec., 722 ; and extensive note to State v. Gardner, 98 Am. St. … Rep., 858 ; Dennett v. Acme Mfg. Co., 106 Maine, 476.
Cited 7 timesPublishedDeArment v. Local Lodge S-6, International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers
779 F. Supp. 200 · District Court, D. Maine · Nov 20, 1991
The court went on to distinguish Hodgson v. … McDermott v. Lehman, 594 F.Supp. 1315 (D.Me.1984). .
Cited 0 timesPublished829 A.2d 520 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 31, 2003
Brown v. Dickey, 106 Me. 97, 103 , 75 A. 382, 385 (1909). We must assume the parties understood the meaning of the technical terms employed. … .”); but see Higgins v.
Cited 17 timesPublishedAndrews v. Department of Environmental Protection
1998 Me. 198 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 3, 1998
See Bush v. … See, e.g., Bartlett v.
Cited 28 timesPublished97 Me. 270 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 1, 1903
M., the plaintiff boarded an electric car in Bath for the purpose of going to his home. At the time the seats, aisle, front and rear platforms of the car were full of passengers. … Atwood v. Bangor, Orono & Old Town Railway Co., 91 Maine, 399. That the plaintiff’s negligence, if he was guilty of negligence, preceded and was independent of the negligence of the defendant cannot be questioned.
Cited 4 timesPublished
Ask Donna