Case law

Electric Storage Battery Co. v. District of Columbia

155 F.2d 867 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 20, 1946

See — District of Columbia v. … United States v. R. P. Andrews & Co., 207 U.S. 229, 241 , 28 S.Ct. 100 , 52 L.Ed. 185 ; In re Globe Varnish Co., 7 Cir., 114 F.2d 916, 918 . Brown Lumber Co. v.

Neiman-Marcus Co. v. Lucas

41 F.2d 300 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 5, 1930

In this the Board was clearly right. United States v. Anderson, 269 U. S. 422 , 46 S. Ct. 131 , 70 L. Ed. 347 ; Wickwire v. Reinecke, 275 U. S. 101 , 48 S. Ct. 43 , 72 L. Ed. 184 ; Williamsport Co. v. … Ed. 985 ; Avery v. Commissioner (C. C. A.) 22 F.(2d) 6 , 55 A. L. R. 1277; Brown v. Commissioner (C. C. A.) 22 F.(2d) 797 ; Rieck v. Heiner (C. C. A.) 25 F.(2d) 453 ; W. K. Henderson Iron Works & Supply Co. v.

Highway Truck Drivers And Helpers Local 107 v. National Labor Relations Board

273 F.2d 815 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 23, 1959

273 F.2d 815 107 U.S.App.D.C. 1 HIGHWAY TRUCK DRIVERS AND HELPERS LOCAL 107, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN AND HELPERS OF AMERICA, Petitioner, v. … MILLER, Circuit Judge. 1 Pursuant to charges made by Virginia-Carolina Freight Lines, Inc., the General Counsel of the National Labor Relations Board filed with the Board on August 26, 1958, a complaint alleging Highway Truck

Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union v. National Labor Relations Board

445 F.2d 237 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 27, 1971

In NLRB v. … The Board, however, had studiously avoided holding one way or the other on the question. When, in Packard Motor Car Co. v.

Active Transportation Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

112 F. App'x 60 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 15, 2004

Hotel Mgmt., LLC v. … The Board, thus, had ample basis to find the parties intended to switch health and pension plans. See Capitol-Husting Co. v. NLRB, 671 F.2d 237, 243 (7th Cir.1982).

Teamsters Local Union Nos. 822 & 592 v. National Labor Relations Board

956 F.2d 317 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 19, 1992

Teamsters Local Union Nos. 822 & 592 v. NLRB, 813 F.2d 472 (D.C.Cir. 1987) (table). … Our role in reviewing the Board’s holding is not without some teeth. We defer to the Board when it interprets the Act reasonably, see NLRB v.

Duane Reade Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

99 F. App'x 240 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 4, 2004

The National Labor Relations Board (Board) found that Duane Reade, Inc. … (citing Amalgamated Local Union 355 v. NLRB, 481 F.2d 996 , 1002 n. 8 (2d Cir.1973); Dep’t Store Food Corp. v. NLRB, 415 F.2d 74 , 77 n. 4 (3d Cir.1969); NLRB v. Clement Bros.

National Black Police Ass'n v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics

858 F. Supp. 251 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 29, 1994

In Day v. Hayes and Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life, Inc. v. … See also Day v. Hayes, Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life, Inc. v.

Service Employees International Union, Local 250 v. National Labor Relations Board

600 F.2d 930 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 25, 1979

The precedent authorities in Great Dane Trailers are, in the main, Labor Board v. Erie Resistor Corp., 373 U.S. 221 , 83 S.Ct. 1139 , 10 L.Ed.2d 308 (1963), and Labor Board v. … Brown, 380 U.S. 278 , 85 S.Ct. 980 , 13 L.Ed.2d 839 (1965). Each is a § 8(a)(3) case where “both discrimination and a resulting discouragement of union membership are necessary,” Labor Board v.

Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers, International Union v. National Labor Relations Board

486 F.2d 1266 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 28, 1973

B. v. … See, e.g., NLRB v. Southern Calif. Dist. Council of Laborers, 443 F.2d 220 (9 Cir. 1971). . Cf. NLRB v. Dover Tavern Owners’ Ass’n, 412 F.2d 725 (3d Cir. 1969). . See, e. g., Douds v.

Citizens Ass'n of Georgetown, Inc. v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

287 A.2d 87 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 24, 1972

PER CURIAM: Citizens Association of Georgetown, Inc., (petitioner) seeks review and reversal of an order of the District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board (respondent) granting a retail Class “C” license to Publick

Alvin Silbaugh, Jr. v. National Labor Relations Board, Kroger Co., Intervenor

429 F.2d 761 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 5, 1970

Mastro Plastics Corp. v. NLRB, 350 U.S. 270 , 76 S.Ct. 349 , 100 L.Ed. 309 (1956). … We conclude, however, that on the record as a whole there is substantial evidence to support the Board’s position. Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951).

Achagzai v. Broad. Bd. of Governors

308 F. Supp. 3d 396 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 20, 2018

See Ng v. … Lahood , 919 F.Supp.2d 93 , 101-02 (D.D.C. 2013) (same); Brown v. Georgetown Univ. Hosp.

Nyman v. Modly

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 1, 2025

Taucher v. Brown-Hruska, 396 F.3d 1168, 1173 (D.C. Cir. 2005) (citation modified). … For one, there is a “presumption of regularity” afforded to a correction board’s decision. Kight v. United States, 850 F. Supp. 2d 165, 170 (D.D.C. 2012) (citation modified).

Securities Industries Ass'n v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

900 F.2d 360 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 10, 1990

Montana v. … The Board, drawing from our opinion in National Courier Ass’n v.

Hobson Ex Rel. Hobson v. Hansen

269 F. Supp. 401 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 19, 1967

So it was in Brown v. Board of Education, Bolling v. Sharpe, and Baker v. Carr. So it is in the South where federal courts are making brave attempts to implement the mandate of Brown . So it is here. … Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483, 493 , 74 S.Ct. 686 (1954). 156 . See Dowell v. School Board, W.D.Okl., 244 F.Supp. 971, 976 (1965), affirmed, sub nom. Board of Ed. of Oklahoma City, etc. v.

LOCAL UNION NO. 112, INT. U. ALLIED INDUS. WKRS. v. Rothman

209 F. Supp. 295 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 9, 1962

209 F.Supp. 295 (1962) LOCAL UNION NO. 112, INTERNATIONAL UNION ALLIED INDUSTRIAL WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, Plaintiff, v. Stuart ROTHMAN, General Counsel of the National Labor Relations Board, Frank W. … Brown, Members, National Labor Relations Board, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 929-62. United States District Court District of Columbia. October 9, 1962. David Previant, Milwaukee, Wis., for plaintiff; Herbert S.

Stanford C. Stoddard v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

868 F.2d 1308 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 3, 1989

Federal Home Loan Bank Board, 839 F.2d 1349 (9th Cir.1988), and Larimore v. Conover, 775 F.2d 890 (7th Cir.1985), rev’d on other grounds, 789 F.2d 1244 (7th Cir.1986) (en banc). … Board of Gov. v. Dimension Fin. Corp., 474 U.S. 361, 373-74 , 106 S.Ct. 681, 688-89 , 88 L.Ed.2d 691 (1986) (citation omitted).

Woods v. Thompson

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 5, 2024

Lee v. United States Agency for Int'l Dev., 859 F.3d 74, 77-78 (D.C. Cir. 2017) (quoting Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 316 (1979)). … Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 573-74 (1992).

Sheet Metal Workers' International Association, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board

293 F.2d 141 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 25, 1961

In National Labor Relations Board v. … Highway Truck Drivers and Helpers Local 107, etc. v. National Labor Relations Board, 1959, 107 U.S.App.D.C. 1 , 273 F.2d 815 ; National Labor Relations Board v. Denver Bldg. & Const.