Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

10,000+ results

3.93s

  • Brown v. Thompson

    927 So. 2d 733 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Mar 2, 2006

    Pursuant to MTCA Section 11-46-11(1), Brown sent a Notice of Claim, dated June 19, 2003, to Bolivar County Chancery Clerk Jeanne Walker and James McBride, President of the Bolivar County Board of Supervisors. … James McBride [1] , Bolivar County Board of Supervisors. . . pursuant to MRCP 4(d)(7)."

    Cited 68 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    207 So. 3d 787 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Jan 30, 2015

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Duerr v. Brown

    262 S.W.3d 63 · Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · Jul 3, 2008

    Sudan v. … Brown contends this statement is a judicial admission that confines Duerr to bringing only a malpractice claim. See Horizon/CMS Healthcare Corp. v.

    Cited 109 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    267 Mich. App. 141 · Michigan Court of Appeals · Jun 23, 2005

    Defendant Tommy Brown appeals as of right his jury trial convictions of assault and battery, MCL 750.81; assault with intent to do great bodily harm less than murder, MCL 750.84; and possession of a firearm during the commission … See also People v Hart, 437 Mich 898 (1991); People v Gjidoda, 140 Mich App 294, 297 ; 364 NW2d 698 (1985); Warren v Smith, 161 F3d 358, 361 (CA 6, 1998).

    Cited 247 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Fischer

    77 A.D.3d 1004 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 7, 2010

    As such, petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, and the matter must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Ortiz v Fischer, 71 AD3d 1244 [2010]; Matter of Johnson v Fischer, 67 AD3d 1217 [2009]).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Rodriguez v. Brown

    336 So. 2d 435 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · May 25, 1976

    Cited 1 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Brown v. Turner

    2024 NY Slip Op 01865 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 4, 2024

    Brown v Turner ( 2024 NY Slip Op 01865 ) Brown v Turner 2024 NY Slip Op 01865 Decided on April 04, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431 … Index No. 31843/18 Appeal No. 1993 Case No. 2023-01036 [*1]Franklin Brown, Plaintiff-Appellant, v Michael Turner, Defendant-Respondent. Kujawski & Kujawski, Deer Park (Mark C. Kujawski of counsel), for appellant.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Sharon Kay Holmes v. James Walter Wack

    464 F.2d 86 · Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · Aug 2, 1972

    The applicable rule was clearly stated by this court in Brown v. … V. v. Walsh Steve. Co., 380 F.2d 523 (5th Cir. 1967), because a case of plain error is not presented.

    Cited 64 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Brown

    2008 Pa. Super. 156 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 16, 2008

    Commonwealth v. … for loss previously compensated by the board to the Crime Victim’s Compensation Fund or other designated account when the claim involves a government agency in addition to or in place of the board.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    456 N.J. Super. 352 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 17, 2018

    We granted defendant Ricky Brown's motion for leave to appeal from a January 31, 2018 trial court order, denying his motion to suppress evidence seized as a result of a strip search following his arrest for indictable drug … But see State v.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    2018 ND 31 · North Dakota Supreme Court · Jan 24, 2018

    State v. … See State v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Kurczy v. St. Joseph Veterans Ass'n, Inc.

    820 A.2d 929 · Supreme Court of Rhode Island · Apr 15, 2003

    During discovery, plaintiff sought the production of defendant’s board-meeting minutes for certain meetings before and after Lucas’ injury at which the board may have discussed the wedding or the accident. … Salcone v.

    Cited 40 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    207 So. 3d 797 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Jan 30, 2015

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Brown ex rel. Brown v. Lesh

    604 S.W.2d 636 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 15, 1980

    Kaelin v. Nuelle, 537 S.W.2d 226, 229, 230 (Mo.App.1976). Plaintiff contends that he was an invitee. This contention is incorrect. He was a licensee. … Wolfson v. Chelist, 284 S.W.2d 447, 448 (Mo.1955). The duty owed to a licensee is set forth in Restatement of Torts § 342 (1934), adopted by our Supreme Court in Wells v. Goforth, 443 S.W.2d 155, 158 (Mo. banc 1969).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    2025 Ohio 8 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 3, 2025

    [Cite as State v. Brown, 2025-Ohio-8.] … Brown. Because the trial court dismissed the indictment for purely legal reasons, we review its decision de novo. See State v. Thacker, 2024-Ohio-5835, ¶ 7 (1st Dist.), citing State v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Loveman

    260 Mich. App. 576 · Michigan Court of Appeals · May 14, 2004

    On July 12, 1998, Marley Loveman-Brown was bom to plaintiff and defendant. … See, e.g., Overall v Overall, 203 Mich App 450, 458 ; 512 NW2d 851 (1994); Bie-lawski v Bielawski, 137 Mich App 587 ; 358 NW2d 383 (1984).

    Cited 92 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    302 A.D.2d 919 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 7, 2003

    Defendant contends that his due process and equal protection rights were violated because the presumptive overrides applied by the New York State Board of Sex Examiners (Board) in making its recommendation of a defendant’ … Those contentions are raised for the first time on appeal and thus are not preserved for our review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Ruz, 70 NY2d 942 ; People v Iannelli, 69 NY2d 684, 685 , cert denied 482 US 914 ; People v

    Cited 37 timesPublished
  • Dixon v. Brown

    62 A.D.3d 1223 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 28, 2009

    that petitioner engaged in inappropriate behavior that delayed the supervisor from engaging in her scheduled duties (compare Matter of Washington v Selsky, 48 AD3d 864, 865 [2008]; Matter of Ramirez v Schultz, 13 AD3d 457 … Finally, petitioner’s claim that he did not receive a fair hearing before an impartial Hearing Officer is not preserved for our review (see Matter of Bailey v Burge, 48 AD3d 854 [2008]; Matter of Williams v Goord, 37 AD3d

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    27 So. 3d 181 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Feb 5, 2010

    In Hannum v. … Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    205 N.J. 133 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 25, 2011

    See United States v. … Opposed—None. 1 Miranda v.

    Cited 46 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.