Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
3.93s
927 So. 2d 733 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Mar 2, 2006
Pursuant to MTCA Section 11-46-11(1), Brown sent a Notice of Claim, dated June 19, 2003, to Bolivar County Chancery Clerk Jeanne Walker and James McBride, President of the Bolivar County Board of Supervisors. … James McBride [1] , Bolivar County Board of Supervisors. . . pursuant to MRCP 4(d)(7)."
Cited 68 timesPublished207 So. 3d 787 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Jan 30, 2015
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text262 S.W.3d 63 · Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · Jul 3, 2008
Sudan v. … Brown contends this statement is a judicial admission that confines Duerr to bringing only a malpractice claim. See Horizon/CMS Healthcare Corp. v.
Cited 109 timesPublished267 Mich. App. 141 · Michigan Court of Appeals · Jun 23, 2005
Defendant Tommy Brown appeals as of right his jury trial convictions of assault and battery, MCL 750.81; assault with intent to do great bodily harm less than murder, MCL 750.84; and possession of a firearm during the commission … See also People v Hart, 437 Mich 898 (1991); People v Gjidoda, 140 Mich App 294, 297 ; 364 NW2d 698 (1985); Warren v Smith, 161 F3d 358, 361 (CA 6, 1998).
Cited 247 timesPublished77 A.D.3d 1004 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 7, 2010
As such, petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, and the matter must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Ortiz v Fischer, 71 AD3d 1244 [2010]; Matter of Johnson v Fischer, 67 AD3d 1217 [2009]).
Cited 3 timesPublished336 So. 2d 435 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · May 25, 1976
Cited 1 timesPublishedNo opinion text2024 NY Slip Op 01865 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 4, 2024
Brown v Turner ( 2024 NY Slip Op 01865 ) Brown v Turner 2024 NY Slip Op 01865 Decided on April 04, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431 … Index No. 31843/18 Appeal No. 1993 Case No. 2023-01036 [*1]Franklin Brown, Plaintiff-Appellant, v Michael Turner, Defendant-Respondent. Kujawski & Kujawski, Deer Park (Mark C. Kujawski of counsel), for appellant.
Cited 1 timesPublishedSharon Kay Holmes v. James Walter Wack
464 F.2d 86 · Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · Aug 2, 1972
The applicable rule was clearly stated by this court in Brown v. … V. v. Walsh Steve. Co., 380 F.2d 523 (5th Cir. 1967), because a case of plain error is not presented.
Cited 64 timesPublished2008 Pa. Super. 156 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 16, 2008
Commonwealth v. … for loss previously compensated by the board to the Crime Victim’s Compensation Fund or other designated account when the claim involves a government agency in addition to or in place of the board.
Cited 16 timesPublished456 N.J. Super. 352 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 17, 2018
We granted defendant Ricky Brown's motion for leave to appeal from a January 31, 2018 trial court order, denying his motion to suppress evidence seized as a result of a strip search following his arrest for indictable drug … But see State v.
Cited 20 timesPublished2018 ND 31 · North Dakota Supreme Court · Jan 24, 2018
State v. … See State v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedKurczy v. St. Joseph Veterans Ass'n, Inc.
820 A.2d 929 · Supreme Court of Rhode Island · Apr 15, 2003
During discovery, plaintiff sought the production of defendant’s board-meeting minutes for certain meetings before and after Lucas’ injury at which the board may have discussed the wedding or the accident. … Salcone v.
Cited 40 timesPublished207 So. 3d 797 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Jan 30, 2015
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text604 S.W.2d 636 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 15, 1980
Kaelin v. Nuelle, 537 S.W.2d 226, 229, 230 (Mo.App.1976). Plaintiff contends that he was an invitee. This contention is incorrect. He was a licensee. … Wolfson v. Chelist, 284 S.W.2d 447, 448 (Mo.1955). The duty owed to a licensee is set forth in Restatement of Torts § 342 (1934), adopted by our Supreme Court in Wells v. Goforth, 443 S.W.2d 155, 158 (Mo. banc 1969).
Cited 4 timesPublished2025 Ohio 8 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 3, 2025
[Cite as State v. Brown, 2025-Ohio-8.] … Brown. Because the trial court dismissed the indictment for purely legal reasons, we review its decision de novo. See State v. Thacker, 2024-Ohio-5835, ¶ 7 (1st Dist.), citing State v.
Cited 6 timesPublished260 Mich. App. 576 · Michigan Court of Appeals · May 14, 2004
On July 12, 1998, Marley Loveman-Brown was bom to plaintiff and defendant. … See, e.g., Overall v Overall, 203 Mich App 450, 458 ; 512 NW2d 851 (1994); Bie-lawski v Bielawski, 137 Mich App 587 ; 358 NW2d 383 (1984).
Cited 92 timesPublished302 A.D.2d 919 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 7, 2003
Defendant contends that his due process and equal protection rights were violated because the presumptive overrides applied by the New York State Board of Sex Examiners (Board) in making its recommendation of a defendant’ … Those contentions are raised for the first time on appeal and thus are not preserved for our review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Ruz, 70 NY2d 942 ; People v Iannelli, 69 NY2d 684, 685 , cert denied 482 US 914 ; People v
Cited 37 timesPublished62 A.D.3d 1223 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 28, 2009
that petitioner engaged in inappropriate behavior that delayed the supervisor from engaging in her scheduled duties (compare Matter of Washington v Selsky, 48 AD3d 864, 865 [2008]; Matter of Ramirez v Schultz, 13 AD3d 457 … Finally, petitioner’s claim that he did not receive a fair hearing before an impartial Hearing Officer is not preserved for our review (see Matter of Bailey v Burge, 48 AD3d 854 [2008]; Matter of Williams v Goord, 37 AD3d
Cited 14 timesPublished27 So. 3d 181 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Feb 5, 2010
In Hannum v. … Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).
Cited 17 timesPublished205 N.J. 133 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 25, 2011
See United States v. … Opposed—None. 1 Miranda v.
Cited 46 timesPublished
Ask Donna