Case law

Simon v. Brown

5 Or. 285 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1874

Brown, the defendant. Then follows a prayer for a writ of mandamus commanding the Treasurer to reduce said currency in the General Fund to coin, and to pay said warrant, with the interest due thereon. … (Griswold v. National Insurance Co., 3 Cowen, 96.)

Spalding v. Brown

32 Or. 594 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 2, 1897

weight of it with any greater degree of certainty than did the trial judge who saw and heard the witnesses, noted their manner, tone and bearing while on the stand, and having reached the conclusion that King loaned to Brown

Brown, Adm'x v. Gessler

191 Or. 503 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 25, 1951

Brown and Mildred C. … Brown, one of the plaintiffs, died, and Mildred C. Brown, as administratrix of the estate of the said William P. Brown, deceased, has been substituted as a party plaintiff.

Brown v. Benston

149 Or. App. 675 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 10, 1997

See Shiel v. … See Moore v. Adams, 273 Or 576, 579 , 542 P2d 490 (1975) (we defer to discretion of trial court); State v.

Department of Human Services v. S. M. S.

281 Or. App. 720 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 19, 2016

Oregon School Activities v. Board of Education, 244 Or App 506, 510 , 260 P3d 735 (2011); see also Dept. of Human Services v. L. … Dept. v. L.

State v. Brown

98 Or. App. 129 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 30, 1989

Under State v. … See State v. Peller, 287 Or 255, 264 , 598 P2d 684 (1979); see also State v. Heikkinen, 94 Or App 472, 475 , 765 P2d 1252 (1988). They also establish probable cause for the police to enter to search for Simmons.

Bays v. Brown

160 Or. 594 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 29, 1938

From Seed v. … Beard, 12 Or. 447 ( 8 Pac. 537 ); Bennett v. Minott, 28 Or. 339 ( 39 Pac. 997 , 44 Pac. 288 ); Morton v.

Gynther v. Brown & McCabe

67 Or. 310 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 16, 1913

And when so determined that intention will control the actual language used: Wyatt v. Wyatt, 31 Or. 531 ( 49 Pac. 855 ); Patterson v. Patterson, 40 Or. 560 ( 67 Pac. 664 ); Holmes v. … Brown & McCabe, 53 Or. 598 ( 101 Pac. 671 ), we think no error was committed. For the reasons herein stated our conviction is the judgment should be affirmed, and it is so ordered. Affirmed. Mr.

Linn Cnty. v. Brown

297 Or. App. 330 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 1, 2019

"(b) 'Local government' means a city, county, municipal corporation or municipal utility operated by a board or commission. … See, e.g., GTE Northwest Inc. v. PUC , 179 Or.

State v. Brown

Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 17, 2023

Brown prejudice that is more than the prejudice that is inherent whenever joined charges allow the jury to hear that the defendant may have committed other bad acts.” State v. … (Citing State v. Brown, 299 Or 143, 151, 699 P2d 1122 (1985).)).

Brown v. Gatti

240 Or. App. 519 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 2, 2011

Brown v. Gatti, 195 Or.App. 695, 698-99 , 99 P.3d 299 (2004) ( Brown I ). … Brown v. Gatti, 341 Or. 452, 457 , 145 P.3d 130 (2006) ( Brown II ).

Johannsen v. Brown

788 F. Supp. 465 · District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 20, 1992

Gray & Co. v. Firstenberg Mach. … Sollinger v. Nasco Int’l, Inc., 655 F.Supp. 1385, 1389 (D.Vt.1987); Micromanipulator Co. v. Bough, 558 F.Supp. 36, 37 (D.Nev.1982); Donner v.

Brown, Adm'r v. Miles

193 Or. 466 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1951

Moody v. Baker, 142 Or 559, 562 , 20 P2d 1069 ; 13 RCL, Homestead, 688, § 148. … Iltz v. Krieger, 104 Or 59, 65 , 202 P 409 , 206 P 550 .

Hazell v. Brown

238 Or. App. 487 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 10, 2010

App. 487 Bryn HAZELL, Francis Nelson, Tom Civiletti, David Delk, Gary Duell, Joan Horton, and Ken Lewis, Plaintiffs-Appellants Cross-Respondents, v. Kate BROWN, Secretary of State of the State of Oregon; and John R. … See Meyer v.

State v. Brown

107 Or. App. 280 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 22, 1991

However, he argues that, under State v. Farley, 308 Or 91 , 775 P2d 835 (1989), the observation of beer cans, bloodshot eyes and the odor of alcohol should have been suppressed. … State v. Kolendar, 100 Or App 319, 323 , 786 P2d 199 , rev den 309 Or 698 (1990).

Brown v. SAIF Corp.

79 Or. App. 205 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 30, 1986

Claimant petitions for review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board that reversed the referee and reinstated SAIF’s denial of his claim for medical services. We affirm. … Rather, he argues that “in cases of potentially toxic or poisonous exposure, it is the exposure to the dangerous substance that is an ‘injury.’ ” In Johnson v.

Brown & Co. v. Rathburn

10 Or. 158 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1882

(Brandt on Suretyship and Guaranty, secs. 17, 384 and 386; Rogers v. School Trustees, 46 Ill., 428 ; Hubbard v. Gusney, 64 N. Y., 457 .)

State v. Brown

232 Or. App. 472 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 16, 2009

State v. Hankins, 342 Or 258, 263 , 151 P3d 149 (2007). … State v. Gaines, 346 Or 160, 171-72 , 206 P3d 1042 (2009).

Brown v. Crawford

254 F. 146 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 25, 1918

McClellan v. Carland, 217 U. S. 268, 282 , 30 Sup. Ct. 501, 505 ( 54 L. Ed. 762 ). And in an earlier case, Gordon v. Gilfoil, 99 U. S. 168, 178 ( 25 L. … Isherwood, unwilling to resist an officer of the court, yielded to the demand, but did so under protest, and Brown assumed possession. Brown subsequently was appointed trustee, and now holds the property as such.

L & D of Oregon, Inc. v. American States Insurance

171 Or. App. 17 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 15, 2000

Similarly, in Bock v. … See also Ferguson v.