Opinion

Spalding v. Brown

  • 32 Or. 594
  • 49 P. 731
  • 1897 Ore. LEXIS 121
Court
Oregon Supreme Court
Filed
Aug 2, 1897
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Per Curiam.

The question presented for consideration by this appeal is one of fact, and inasmuch as there exists in the record an irreconcilable conflict in the testimony submitted at the trial, it is impossible for this court to determine the weight of it with any greater degree of certainty than did the trial judge who saw and heard the witnesses, noted their manner, tone and bearing while on the stand, and having reached the conclusion that King loaned to Brown the sum of $1,000 in the manner and under the circumstances indicated, we are not prepared to say, after a careful examination of the record, that this finding is not supported by the evidence, and hence it follows that the decree must be affirmed^ and it is so ordered.

Appirmed.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.