Case law

State v. Edmondson

536 P.2d 386 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 23, 1975

See State v. Adams, Okl.Cr., 400 P.2d 467 (1965). … See also Kovash v. State, Okl.Cr., 519 P.2d 517 (1974). Judge Brown has thus ruled that the corpus delic-ti has not been proved and the appellee so urges.

Rawley v. Commonwealth Cotton Oil Co.

88 Okla. 29 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 12, 1922

The undisputed evidence further shows that the two boys borrowed the guns from one Sylvester Brown, a.negro employed as night watchman by the Commonwealth Cotton Oil Company; that the guns were the private property of Brown … Mirick v. Sucky (Kan.) 87 Pac. 1141 . Put counsel say the law requires of persons having in their custody instruments of danger, that (hey should keep them with the utmost care, and Dixon v.

Thompson v. State

462 P.2d 299 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 12, 1969

In Davis v. … See also Gossett v. State, Okl.Cr., 373 P.2d 285 (1962), at 287. Likewise, we note the holding of this court in Mitchell v.

Simms v. Board of County Commissioners for Oklahoma County

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Oct 28, 2024

Van Skiver v. United States, 952 F.2d 1241, 1243 (10th Cir. 1991). However, “a district court always has the inherent power to reconsider its interlocutory rulings.” Warren v. Am. … See Minter v. Prime Equip.

THE ICON AT NORMAN APTS, LP v. DOUGLAS WARR, CLEVELAND COUNTY ASSESSOR

2025 OK 42 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 17, 2025

Icon protested this decision, to no avail, then appealed to the Cleveland County Board of Equalization. … McGinnity v. Kirk, 2015 OK 73 362 P.3d 186 Bowls v.

Felts v. State

588 P.2d 572 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 12, 1978

Clifton Brown was immediately reappointed to represent the defendant, as reflected by a docket sheet minute to this effect. However, the order appointing Brown was not filed until October 10, 1975. … BROWN: Object as hearsay. “THE COURT: Well, did you learn where his address was? “THE WITNESS: He just told me that— “MR. BROWN: Object to whatever he said to him, Judge. “MR.

Goodnight v. Board of County Commissioners of Cleveland County

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Sep 12, 2024

Brown v. Montoya, 662 F.3d 1152, 1164 (10th Cir. 2011) (quoting Dodds, 614 F.3d at 1199). … Comm’rs of Bryan Cnty. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997).

In Re Skelton Lead & Zinc Co.'s Gross Production Tax for 1919

81 Okla. 134 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 5, 1921

Co. v. Texas, 210 U. S. 217 ; McHenry v. Alford, 168 U. S. 651 ; quoting and relying upon the same language which we have above quoted. In Brown v. Spillman, 155 U. … In Ohio Oil Co. v. Indiana, 177 U. S. 190 , the same thing was held upon the authority' • of Brown v. Spillman, supra, the court citing, quoting, and relying upon the reasoning in Brown v. Spillman. In Manuel v.

Houston v. Independent School District No. 89

949 F. Supp. 2d 1104 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · May 30, 2013

See Monell, 436 U.S. at 694 , 98 S.Ct. 2018 ; see also Board of County Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 409 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997). … See Morris v. City of Colorado Springs, 666 F.3d 654, 661 (10th Cir.2012); see also Couch v. Board of Trustees, 587 F.3d 1223, 1235 (10th Cir.2009).

Travelers Fire Insurance Company v. Wright

322 P.2d 417 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 25, 1958

In Ray v. … Crum v. Brock, infra. If the witness Brown is forced to testify relative to the cause of the fire he will not be disclosing any facts which go to make up the crime of perjury.

Harmon v. Phillips Petroleum Co.

196 Okla. 607 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 26, 1946

V. … Crouch & Son v. Huber, 87 Okla. 83 , 209 P. 764 ; Davis v. Goodwin-Barclay Co., 120 Okla. 274 , 251 P. 1042 ; Nickel v. Janda, 115 Okla. 207 , 242 P. 264 ; Brown v. Privette, 109 Okla. 1 , 234 P. 577 ; Duncan v.

Flores v. State

71 O.B.A.J. 137 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 29, 1999

Holbird v. State, 1982 OK CR 130, ¶ 24 , 650 P.2d 66, 70 . In this case there are sufficient intervening factors to purge any taint originating from the actions of officer Goree. See Brown v. … See Le v.

YERTON v. CITY OF TULSA

2023 OK CIV APP 18 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 14, 2023

YERTON v. … Fanning v. Brown , 2004 OK 7 85 P.3d 841 Id .

Griffin v. State

490 P.2d 1387 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 23, 1971

In Harris v. … Grant v. State, Okl.Cr., 385 P.2d 925 (1963).

Raible v. Yawman

93 Okla. 168 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 6, 1923

In Board of Com’rs et al. v. … In Van Sickle v. Kellogg, 19 Mich. 49 , it was held that it must be shown there was an agreement or consent to have the action tried to a jury of less than 12. In Brown v. Hannibal & St. J. Ry.

Bostwick v. Atlas Iron Masters, Inc.

780 P.2d 1184 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 20, 1988

In University of Tennessee v. … Eddy v. Brown, 715 P.2d 74 (Okl.1986).

Rox Petroleum, L.L.C. v. New Dominion, L.L.C.

184 P.3d 502 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 12, 2008

Manley v. Brown, 1999 OK 79, ¶ 22 , 989 P.2d 448, 455-456 . Summary judgment settles only questions of law, which we review de novo. Id. … Clauer died with the residue of his property passing to the Board of Trustees of Carleton College.

Elkins v. Hardin

327 P.2d 468 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 6, 1958

In Brown v. … The one Oklahoma case, most nearly in-point, insofar as the applicable reasoning is Reynolds v. Phipps, 89 Okl. 21 , 213 P. 855, 857 .

In Matter of Estate of Brown

600 P.2d 857 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 18, 1979

We do not believe that § 4 of the Act of 1908 or § 23 of the 1906 Act have prohibited Thompson Brown from making a will with a power of sale. Nor do we believe that Ryburn v. … Court decided the case of Tucker v.

Leatherock v. Lawter

45 Okla. 715 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 2, 1915

In State v. … SHARP and BROWN, J. J., concur, KANE, C. J., dissents.