Case law

Hayden v. Russell

119 Me. 38 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 24, 1920

Long v. Cockern, 128 Ill., 29; Kohreman v. Dunbar, 152 Ill., *41 A. 34; Franklin Nat. Bank v. Whitehead, 149 Ind., 560 ; Longey v. Leach, 7 Vt., 377 ; Travis v Bishop, 13 Met., 304 ; Bingham v. … Jordan, 1 Allen, 373; Whitney v. Browne et al., 180 Mass., 597 . In Rich v.

Dorr v. Maine Maritime Academy

670 A.2d 930 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 2, 1996

In Ward v. … Remanded to the Workers’ Compensation Board for further proceedings consistent with the opinion herein. All concurring. 1 .

DeArment v. Local Lodge S-6, International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers

779 F. Supp. 200 · District Court, D. Maine · Nov 20, 1991

The court went on to distinguish Hodgson v. … McDermott v. Lehman, 594 F.Supp. 1315 (D.Me.1984). .

Lawrence v. Ford

44 Me. 427 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1857

Williams v. Veazie, 8 Greenl. R., 106; ib. 138. … Chesley v. Brown, 11 Maine R., 143.

Bilodeau v. Maine Employment Security Commission

153 Me. 254 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 21, 1957

Ablondi, et al. v. Board of Review (Superior Ct. App. Div.), 73 A. (2nd) 262 (N. J.); Great A. & P. Tea Company v. New Jersey Dept. of Labor and Industry, etc. (Superior Ct. App. Div.), 101 A. (2nd) 573 (N. J.). … Gerber v. Board of Review, etc., supra; Unemployment Compensation Commission of Alaska v. Aragon, 329 U. S., 143 ; Johnson v. Iowa Employment Sec. Com., 32 N. W. (2nd) 786 (Iowa). See 28 A. L. R. (2nd) 287. 81 C. J.

Andrews v. Department of Environmental Protection

1998 Me. 198 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 3, 1998

See Bush v. … See, e.g., Bartlett v.

Knowlton v. Homer

30 Me. 552 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1849

In Musselbrook v. … And in McArthur v.

Stoddard v. Crocker

100 Me. 450 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 16, 1905

Jones on Liens, § 976; Mulliner v. Florence, 3 Q. B. Division, 489; Jones v. Pearle, 1 Strange, 556. The statute as to warehousemen, c. 31, E. S. of 1883, made no provision for sale. … Bassett v. Carleton, 32 Maine, 553; Sudbury Meadows v. Middlesex Canal, 23 Pick. 47 ; Starbird v. Brown, 84 Maine, 240.

State v. O'Donnell

131 Me. 294 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 27, 1932

State v. Lambert, 97 Me., 51, 53 A., 879 ; State v. Albanes, 109 Me., 199, 83 A., 548 ; State v. Priest, 117 Me., 223, 103 A., 359 ; State v. Dodge, supra. … State v. Grover, supra; State v. Priest, supra.

State v. Fletcher

126 Me. 153 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 31, 1927

State v. Intox. Liquors, 80 Me., 57; Com. v. Kimball, 24 Pick., 366 , 373; See Title, Words and Phrases. … S., State v. Wenworth, 65 Me., 234; State v. Brown, 31 Me., 520; Com. v. Nichols, 10 Met., 259 ; Com. v. Holmes, 119 Mass., 195 ; Com. v. Uhrig, 138 Mass., 492 ; State v.

Raymond v. Portland Railroad

100 Me. 529 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 6, 1905

Then he proceeds to. quote from Storer v. … See also Rowse v. Downs, 5 Kan. App. 549 ; McPheters v. Hannibal, etc., R. Co., 45 Mo. 22 ; Reed v. Western Union Tel. Co., 135 Mo. 661 ; Culbertson v. Halliday, 50 Neb. 229 .

Sacknoff v. Sacknoff

131 Me. 280 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 20, 1932

Spiller v. Close, 110 Me., 302, 86 A., 173 ; Laughlin v. Eaton, 54 Me., 156; Ballard v. Russell, 33 Me., 196. … Morrison v. Brown, 84 Me., 82, 24 A., 672 ; Hobbs v. Hobbs, 70 Me., 383. “It relates to cases when, by the very assumption, the hunsband may be a party with the wife, or not, at her election.” Hobbs v.

State Tax Assessor v. Tracfone Wireless, Inc.

2022 ME 36 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 23, 2022

Goggin v. … See Wawenock, LLC v.

Estes v. Smith

521 A.2d 682 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 24, 1987

See Brickley v. Leonard, 129 Me. 94, 97 , 149 A. 833, 835 (1930). … Chillingworth provided him with plane tickets, room and board and paid him $300 a month. The plaintiffs responsibilities included nursing care of Mrs. Chillingworth, shopping, cooking and maintaining the grounds.

Inhabitants of Dover v. Inhabitants of Deer Isle

15 Me. 169 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 15, 1838

It has beep deoided in several cases, cited in the argument, that a notice signed by one overseer, in behalf or by order of the board, is sufficient. In Garland v. … Bridgewater v. Dartmouth, 4 Mass.

Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes v. Guilford Transportation Industries, Inc.

808 F. Supp. 46 · District Court, D. Maine · Dec 9, 1992

Relying on NLRB v. … Air Transport Employees v.

Parsons v. Stevens

107 Me. 65 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 14, 1910

Pitman v. Thornton, 65 Maine, 96, 99; Clapp v. Thaxter, 7 Gray, 384 ; Brown v. Aspden, 14 How. 26 ; 2 Smith’s Chancery Practice, pages 5 et seq. … In Brown v. Aspden, 14 How. 26 , it was said "By the established rule of chancery practice a rehearing in the sense in which that term is used in proceedings in equity cannot be allowed after a decree is enrolled.”

Lear v. Manser

114 Me. 342 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 3, 1916

For example, in Howard v. Am. … Cutter v. Burrows, 100 Maine, 379. This case therefore is plainly distinguishable from *347 that of Murdock v. Bridges. For a case very similar to the one at bar, see Dennis v.

Joyce v. S.D. Warren Co.

759 A.2d 712 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 28, 2000

In Moreau v. … Remanded to the Workers’ Compensation Board to dismiss the 1992 injury claims as barred by the then applicable statute of limitations. . See Moreau v. S.D. Warren Co., 2000 ME 62 , 748 A.2d 1001 ; Wallace v. S.D.

Cushing Nature & Preservation Center v. Town of Cushing

785 A.2d 342 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 29, 2001

Charlton v. Town of Oxford, 2001 ME 104, ¶ 10 , 774 A.2d 366, 371 . … Bell v. Town of Wells, 557 A.2d 168, 173 (Me.1989).