Case law

Retail Clerks International Ass'n Local No. 455 v. National Labor Relations Board

510 F.2d 802 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 4, 1975

Div. v. NLRB, 492 F.2d 63 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom. Local 445, Electrical Workers v. Sperry Systems Mgmt. Div., 419 U.S. 831 , 95 S.Ct. 55 , 42 L.Ed.2d 57 (1974); Boire v. … While the Board may defer to arbitration on the issue of accretion to an existing unit, both the Board and the courts have required that any award be consistent with Board bargaining unit policy. See Boire v.

Banks v. Farello

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 1, 2026

Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiff’s allegations are vague and board, rather than clear and direct, see Fed. R. Civ. … Corp. v.

Dallas General Drivers, Warehousemen And Helpers, Local Union No. 745, International Brotherhood Of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen And Helpers Of America v. National Labor Relations Board

355 F.2d 842 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 6, 1966

with such problems. 8 Where good faith bargaining has not resolved a key issue and where there are no definite plans for further efforts to break the deadlock, the Board is warranted, see American Ship Building Co. v. … N.L.R.B. v.

United Food & Commercial Workers International Union v. National Labor Relations Board

880 F.2d 1422 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 4, 1989

We find no clear answer to this question in the Board’s precedent, and thus we leave it to the Board, in its expertise, to confront the claim initially. V. … Retail Clerks Union 1059 v.

Electric Storage Battery Co. v. District of Columbia

155 F.2d 867 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 20, 1946

See — District of Columbia v. … United States v. R. P. Andrews & Co., 207 U.S. 229, 241 , 28 S.Ct. 100 , 52 L.Ed. 185 ; In re Globe Varnish Co., 7 Cir., 114 F.2d 916, 918 . Brown Lumber Co. v.

District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department v. District of Columbia Public Employee Relations Board

901 A.2d 784 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 29, 2006

Postal Workers v. United States Postal Serv., 252 U.S.App. … Even where, in United Paper-workers Int’l Union, AFL-CIO v.

Bender v. Jordan

District Court, District of Columbia · May 5, 2009

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … Brown v. Paulson, 541 F. Supp. 2d 379, 383 (D.D.C. 2008) (internal citations omitted). III.

Carter v. Greenspan

304 F. Supp. 2d 13 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 19, 2004

See Brown v. Marsh, 777 F.2d 8, 13 (D.C.Cir.1985); Lloyd v. Chao, 240 F.Supp.2d 1, 3 (D.D.C.2002). … See Brown, 199 F.3d at 452 . Causation is often demonstrated by proximity in time, see Gleklen v.

George W. Melson v. Thomas R. Sard

402 F.2d 653 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 13, 1968

In Garrity v. … See Boswell v. United States Bd. of Parole, 128 U.S.App.D.C. 311, 315 , 388 F.2d 567, 571 (1967); Brown v. Taylor, 287 F.2d 334 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 366 U.S. 970 , 81 S.Ct. 1933 , 6 L.Ed.2d 1259 (1961).

Louis DeNaples v. Office of the Comptroller of Currency

706 F.3d 481 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 29, 2013

Kuray, Attorney.  2 Before: ROGERS and BROWN, Circuit Judges, and WILLIAMS, Senior Circuit Judge. Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge BROWN. … But that does not mean the Board has exclusive enforcement authority over § 19 violations. See, e.g., United States v.

Detroit Newspaper Agency v. National Labor Relations Board

171 F. App'x 352 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 7, 2006

Our review “is limited to determining whether the Board’s findings of fact are supported by substantial evidence” in the record as a whole, and if so, “whether the Board acted arbitrarily or otherwise erred in applying established … Stanford Hosp. & Clinics v. NLRB, 370 F.3d 1210, 1212 (D.C.Cir.2004). The Board’s findings are supported by the testimony of multiple witnesses, as well as by other direct evidence.

In Re Fogel

679 A.2d 1052 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 11, 1996

Rogers v. United States, 566 A.2d 69, 73 (D.C.1989) (en banc) (citations omitted). … See North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25 , 91 S.Ct. 160 , 27 L.Ed.2d 162 (1970) (guilty plea with assertion of factual innocence). 4 . D.C. Code § 22-1204 , repealed, D.C.

Truck Drivers & Helpers Local No. 728 v. National Labor Relations Board

386 F.2d 643 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 6, 1967

On consideration of intervenor’s motion to dismiss and set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board and of the oppositions of the National Labor Relations Board and petitioner thereto; and on consideration of … International Union, United Auto., Aerospace & Agricultural Workers v. NLRB (Preston Products Co.), 126 U.S.App.D.C. 11 , 373 F.2d 671, 674 (1967). The Board takes no position on the motion to transfer.

National Ass'n of Mortgage Brokers v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

770 F. Supp. 2d 283 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 21, 2011

(“NAIHP”) against the Board. … For example, in Hanson v.

Paul v. Judicial Watch, Inc.

571 F. Supp. 2d 17 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 16, 2008

Id. at 1055-56 (quoting Board of Education of New York City v. Nyquist, 590 F.2d 1241, 1246 (2d Cir.1979)) (citations, footnotes and internal quotation marks omitted). … In doing so, it specifically cites two cases, Brown v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, 486 A.2d 37 (D.C.1984) (en banc) and T.C. Theatre Corp. v.

Citizens Ass'n of Georgetown, Inc. v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

410 A.2d 195 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 4, 1979

See Legislative Study Club, Inc. v. D.C. Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 359 A.2d 153 (1976) (political advocacy group); Carpenter v. … Zoning Board of Appeals, 352 Mass. 54 , 223 N.E.2d 679 (1967) (token memberships allowed).

Maher v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation

271 F. Supp. 3d 296 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 26, 2017

Cl. 413; Maher v. FDIC (Maher III), 441 F.3d 522 (7th Cir. 2006); Maher v. United States (Maher II), 314 F.3d 600 (Fed. Cir. 2002); Maher v. Harris Trust & Sav. Bank (Maher I), 75 F.3d 1182 (7th Cir. 1996). … DATE: September 26, 2017 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

Northwest Graphics, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

156 F. App'x 331 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 14, 2005

The record easily supports the Board’s decisions. … . § 160 (e) (Board’s factual findings are “conclusive” upon this court if “supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole”); Tualatin Elec., Inc. v.

Vip Health Services, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

164 F.3d 644 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 12, 1999

P 10,333 VIP HEALTH SERVICES, INC., Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. Local 2, Federation of Nurses, United Federation of Teachers, American Federation of Teachers, AFL-CIO, Intervenor. … . 1 Because certification of a bargaining unit by the Board in a representation proceeding is not an "order" subject to judicial review, see American Fed'n of Labor v.

Office & Professional Employees International Union, Local 425 v. National Labor Relations Board

419 F.2d 314 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 19, 1969

On the facts of this case we could not upset the Board’s assertion of its jurisdiction even assuming applicability of the narrower standard suggested by Member Brown. … Employer directs us particularly to the analysis of Board Member Brown in his concurring opinion in Cloverleaf Div. of Adams Dairy Co., 147 N.L.R.B. 1410 , 1421 (1964). .