Case law

United States v. Tilghman, Warren P.

134 F.3d 414 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 3, 1998

United States v. Norris, 873 F.2d 1519, 1525-26 (D.C. … This case also differs from United States v.

San Antonio ex rel. City Public Service Board v. United States

631 F.2d 831 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 9, 1980

Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. v. Wichita Bd. of Trade, 412 U.S. 800, 806 , 93 S.Ct. 2367, 2374 , 37 L.Ed.2d 350 (1973) (quoting Board of Trade v. … Aberdeen & Rockfish R.R. v.

Walter Jackson, Jr. v. Raymond Mabus, Jr.

808 F.3d 933 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 29, 2015

The District Court granted summary judgment to the Board. Jackson v. Mabus, 56 F. Supp. 3d 1 (D.D.C. 2014). We review the District Court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. See Roberts v. … See, e.g., Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association v.

Ballard v. District of Columbia

10 D.C. 49 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 1, 1881

The thirty-seventh section of the act organizing a government for the District of Columbia requires that all contracts made by the Board of Public Works shall be in writing and signed by the parties making the same, and a … The act contemplated a written instrument filed away in the archives of the board and authenticated by their signatures. There is no such officer provided for as an assistant secretary.

Kat, LLC T/A Cloud Lounge & Sports Bar v. D.C. Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 27, 2024

Levelle, Inc. v. D.C. Alcoholic Beverage Control Bd., 924 A.2d 1030, 1035 (D.C. 2007). … “Prior Adjudication” is defined as “[v]iolations that have been adjudicated and can therefore be counted for purposes of computing violation history.” 23 D.C.M.R. § 199.

In Re Laibstain

841 A.2d 1259 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 12, 2004

Laibstain did not respond- to the show cause order or participate in the Board proceeding that ensued. 2 Bar Counsel *1261 asked the Board to impose disbarment as “functionally equivalent” reciprocal discipline. … In re Brown, 797 A.2d 1232 (D.C.2002) (suspension); see also In re Best, 825 A.2d 301, 302 (D.C.2003) (disbarment).

Paralyzed Veterans Of America v. Civil Aeronautics Board

752 F.2d 694 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 26, 1985

In North Haven Board of Education v. … Sec. 1681 (a) (1982)) 88 See, e.g., Brown v.

Chauffeurs, Teamsters & Helpers, Local 633 v. National Labor Relations Board

509 F.2d 490 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 23, 1974

This Court refused to accept the Board’s position based on its loss in NLRB v. … The need for this safe harbor is considerably lessened by the Board’s new practice on authorization cards announced at oral argument in Gissel, 395 U.S. at 594 , 89 S.Ct. 1918 , and is eliminated altogether by the Board’s

International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace And Agricultural Implement Workers Of America (Uaw) v. National Labor Relations Board

381 F.2d 265 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 9, 1967

Brown, Jr., Atty., N.L.R.B., with whom Messrs. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, were on the brief, for respondent. Mr. Eugene L. … And in Puerto Rico Telephone Co. v.

John S. Wertz v. Brown & Root, Inc., Raymond International, Inc., Walsh Construction Co.

316 F.2d 392 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 12, 1963

Spring Valley Wesley Heights Citizens Ass'n v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

644 A.2d 434 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 23, 1994

Co. v. Public Service Comm’n of District of Columbia, 378 A.2d 1085, 1089 (D.C.1977). “Absent express statutory or regulatory authority, a regulatory agency may not impose remedial measures.” Davidson v. … Board.

Banks v. Farello

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 1, 2026

Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiff’s allegations are vague and board, rather than clear and direct, see Fed. R. Civ. … Corp. v.

Ardith M. Horne v. Merit Systems Protection Board and Interstate Commerce Commission

684 F.2d 155 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 3, 1982

Healthy Board of Educ. v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274, 279 , 97 S.Ct. 568, 572 , 50 L.Ed.2d 471 (1977). … The Board’s decision is therefore vacated, and the case remanded to the ICC for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion. So ordered. 1 . ICC Commissioner Brown selected Horne as an attorney-advisor in 1967.

Alrob Enterprises, Inc. v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

337 A.2d 497 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 7, 1975

Butz v. Glover Livestock Comm’n Co., 411 U.S. 182, 187 , 93 S.Ct. 1455, 1459 , 36 L.Ed.2d 142 (1973). … Federal Communications Commission v. WOKO, Inc., 329 U.S. 223, 228 , 67 S.Ct. 213, 216 , 91 L.Ed. 204 (1946). In 2447 Good Hope Rd., Inc. v. District of Columbia A. B. C.

U-Haul Co. of California, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

255 F. App'x 527 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 13, 2007

JUDGMENT This appeal was considered on the record from the National Labor Relations Board and on the briefs of the parties. … It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the petitions for review be denied and the Board’s application for enforcement be granted. Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published.

Dallas General Drivers, Warehousemen And Helpers, Local Union No. 745, International Brotherhood Of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen And Helpers Of America v. National Labor Relations Board

355 F.2d 842 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 6, 1966

with such problems. 8 Where good faith bargaining has not resolved a key issue and where there are no definite plans for further efforts to break the deadlock, the Board is warranted, see American Ship Building Co. v. … N.L.R.B. v.

Bulluck v. Washington

468 F.2d 1096 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 19, 1972

That was what Brown v. Board of Education [, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954),] was all about. Indeed it was. … Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, 402 U.S. 1, 18 , 91 S.Ct. 1267, 1277 , 28 L.Ed.2d 554 (1971). . Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Board of Educ. v.

George W. Melson v. Thomas R. Sard

402 F.2d 653 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 13, 1968

In Garrity v. … See Boswell v. United States Bd. of Parole, 128 U.S.App.D.C. 311, 315 , 388 F.2d 567, 571 (1967); Brown v. Taylor, 287 F.2d 334 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 366 U.S. 970 , 81 S.Ct. 1933 , 6 L.Ed.2d 1259 (1961).

Citizens Ass'n of Georgetown, Inc. v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

279 A.2d 514 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 13, 1971

Compare Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. … Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce Comm’n, 219 U.S. 498 , 31 S.Ct. 279 , 55 L.Ed. 310 (1911) ; United States v.

District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department v. District of Columbia Public Employee Relations Board

901 A.2d 784 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 29, 2006

Postal Workers v. United States Postal Serv., 252 U.S.App. … Even where, in United Paper-workers Int’l Union, AFL-CIO v.