Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersDC

10,000+ results

1.55s

  • Teamsters Local Union No. 171 v. National Labor Relations Board

    863 F.2d 946 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 9, 1988

    See Southwest Regional Joint Bd. v. … See NLRB v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • DC METRO. POLICE DEPT. v. Broadus

    560 A.2d 501 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 9, 1989

    Jones v. Police and Firemen's Retirement and Relief Board, 375 A.2d 1, 5 (D.C.1977). … Saah v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, 433 A.2d 1114, 1116 (D.C.1981). We examine the record accordingly. III.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • North Cleveland Park Citizens Ass'n v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

    541 A.2d 912 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 25, 1988

    See Jackson v. District of Columbia Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board, 537 A.2d 576 (D.C.1988). … Compare Nelson v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Bell v. District of Columbia Department of Corrections

    403 A.2d 330 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 21, 1979

    Davis v. Attorney General, supra, and Brown v. … Brown v. United States, supra, relied upon the authority of Davis v. Attorney General, supra. 4 .

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Daniel v. Fulwood

    823 F. Supp. 2d 13 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2011

    Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C. Cir. 2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242. … Warren v. District of Columbia, 353 F.3d 36, 39 (D.C. Cir. 2004); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242. “Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements, do not suffice.”

    Reversed by Roy Daniel v. Isaac Fulwood, Jr., 766 F.3d 57 (2014)Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Truck Drivers And Helpers Local Union 728 v. National Labor Relations Board

    249 F.2d 512 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 28, 1957

    B. v. Denver Bldg. & Const. Trades Council, supra, 341 U.S. at page 692, 71 S.Ct. at page 953. 8 We recognize the doubt, but we must give weight to the resolution of it by the Board. … Carlson v. People of State of California, 310 U.S. 106 , 60 S.Ct. 746 , 84 L.Ed. 1104 ; Thornhill v. State of Alabama, 310 U.S. 88 , 60 S.Ct. 736 , 84 L.Ed. 1093 .

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Townsend v. Mabus

    736 F. Supp. 2d 250 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 13, 2010

    Townsend; and the entire 256-page Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) hearing transcript. … s Mem. at 23-24); see also Brown v. Gen. Servs.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Paralyzed Veterans Of America v. Civil Aeronautics Board

    804 F.2d 1306 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 14, 1986

    CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Federal Aviation Administration, United States Department of Transportation, Respondents, Regional Airline Association, Intervenor. No. 83-1055. … Before WALD, Chief Judge and MIKVA, Circuit Judge. * PER CURIAM. 1 In Paralyzed Veterans of America v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Artis, Cynthia v. Greenspan, Alan

    158 F.3d 1301 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 20, 1998

    ."); see also Barnes v. … Brown v. Marsh, 777 F.2d 8, 15 (D.C.

    Cited 72 timesPublished
  • The Kamit Institute for Magnificent Achievers v. District of Columbia Public Charter School Board

    81 A.3d 1282 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 26, 2013

    .”); Mallof v. D.C. … Comford v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Thomas v. Power

    District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 25, 2026

    Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … Brown v. Gen. Servs. Admin., 425 U.S. 820, 835 (1976); see also Alhayoti v. Blinken, No. 21-cv-7713, 2022 WL 2869850, at *1, 4–5 (N.D. Cal.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cintron v. Jetblue Airways Corp.

    324 F. Supp. 3d 248 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 15, 2018

    Bower v. EgyptAir Airlines Co. , 731 F.3d 85 , 93 (1st Cir. 2013) (quoting Brown v. United Airlines, Inc. , 720 F.3d 60 , 63 (1st Cir. 2013) ). … The Fourth Circuit has taken a similar middle-ground approach in Smith v. Comair, Inc. , 134 F.3d 254 , 259 (4th Cir. 1998) (holding that "boarding procedures are a service rendered by an airline").

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Chandamuri v. Georgetown University

    274 F. Supp. 2d 71 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 22, 2003

    Circuit’s more recent analysis in Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235 (D.C.Cir.2002). … Jackson v. Birmingham Board of Educ., 309 F.3d 1333 (11th Cir.2002). The Jackson court relied heavily on the Supreme Court’s assertion that: [P]rivate rights of action to enforce federal law must be created by Congress.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Ari Bailey v. Isaac Fulwood, Jr.

    793 F.3d 127 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 14, 2015

    Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge BROWN. Opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part filed by Circuit Judge ROGERS. … Court of Appeals had already explained the broad discretion retained by the Board under the 1987 Regulations. Davis v. Henderson, 652 A.2d 634 (D.C.1995); White v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

    489 F.3d 1310 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 15, 2007

    Testing Co., Inc. v. NLRB, 160 F.3d 14, 20, 22 (D.C. Cir. 1998); accord Raven Servs. Corp. v. NLRB, 315 F.3d 499, 505 (5th Cir. 2002); Olivetti Office U.S.A., Inc. v. … Detroit Typographical Union No. 18 v. NLRB, 216 F.3d 109, 117-18 (D.C. Cir. 2000); see also TruServ Corp. v. NLRB, 254 F.3d 1105, 1114 & n.8 (D.C. Cir. 2001); Noel Foods, a Div. of Noel Corp. v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Ghaith R. Pharaon v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

    135 F.3d 148 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 17, 1998

    In-teramericas Invs., Ltd. v. Board of Governors of the Fed. Reserve Sys., 111 F.3d 376, 384 (5th Cir.1997). It is enough, as the Board found, that Pharaon agreed to act as BCCI’s nominee. … Design, Inc. v.

    Cited 38 timesPublished
  • Rose Lees Hardy Home & School Ass'n v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

    343 A.2d 564 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 26, 1975

    See Udall v. Tallman, 380 U.S. 1, 16-17 , 85 S.Ct. 792 , 13 L.Ed.2d 616 (1965); Daniel v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 329 A.2d 773, 775 (1974); Dietrich v. … District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 320 A.2d 282, 286 (1974); Taylor v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App.,' 308 A.2d 230, 232 (1973).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Washington v. District of Columbia

    538 F. Supp. 2d 269 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 18, 2008

    Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64, 67 (D.C.Cir.2003); Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . … Warren v. District of Columbia, 353 F.3d 36, 39 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . B. The Court Grants the Defendant’s Motion To Dismiss 1.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board

    350 F.2d 791 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 7, 1965

    The only significant question presented is whether under our recent decision in International Organization of Masters, Mates and Pilots of America, Inc., et al. v. … The Board’s order will be enforced.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Ballard v. District of Columbia

    10 D.C. 49 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 1, 1881

    The thirty-seventh section of the act organizing a government for the District of Columbia requires that all contracts made by the Board of Public Works shall be in writing and signed by the parties making the same, and a … The act contemplated a written instrument filed away in the archives of the board and authenticated by their signatures. There is no such officer provided for as an assistant secretary.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.