Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.15s
265 N.C. 548 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 3, 1965
See State v. Thompson, 257 N.C. 452 , 126 S.E. 2d 58 ; State v. Merritt, 244 N.C. 687 , 94 S.E. 2d 825 ; State v. Albarty, 238 N.C. 130 , 76 S.E. 2d 381 ; State v. Williams, 210 N.C. 159 , 185 S.E. 661 . … State v. Camel, 230 N.C. 426 , 53 S.E. 2d 313 ; State v. Epps, 213 N.C. 709 , 197 S.E. 580 .
Cited 5 timesPublishedHussey v. Montgomery Memorial Hospital, Inc.
114 N.C. App. 223 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 5, 1994
This appeal involves an action brought by plaintiffs, husband James Robert Hussey and wife Eva Lee Brown Hussey, against defendant Montgomery Memorial Hospital, Inc., alleging that de *225 fendant’s negligence resulted in … The Court quoted at length from Dawson v. Eli Lilly and Co., 543 F. Supp. 1330, 1338 (D.D.C. 1982): Where the injury is latent, the claim is held not to accrue until the plaintiff discovers the injury.
Cited 1 timesPublishedLearning Center/Ogden School, Inc. v. Cherokee County Board of Education
223 N.C. App. 423 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 20, 2012
This Court’s recent decision in Thomas Jefferson Classical Acad. v. Rutherford Cnty. Bd. of Educ., 215 N.C. … While school boards have argued that not all funds deposited in the local current expense fund are subject to distribution to charter schools, this Court, in Sugar Creek Charter Sch., Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedAt & T Wireless PCS, Inc. v. Winston-Salem Zoning Board of Adjustment
11 F. Supp. 2d 760 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jun 12, 1998
See Paging, Inc. v. Board of Zoning Appeals for Montgomery County, 957 F.Supp. 805 (W.D.Va.1997); accord BellSouth Mobility Inc. v. Gwinnett County, 944 F.Supp. 923 (N.D.Ga.1996); Mountain Solutions, Inc. v. State Corp. … Woodhouse v. Board of Commissioners of Nags Head, 299 N.C. 211, 215 , 261 S.E.2d 882, 886 (1980).
Cited 14 timesPublishedPerley v. Ballenger Paving Co.
228 N.C. 479 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 25, 1948
The facts upon which the decisions were based in Gulf Refining Co. v. Brown, 93 E. (2), 870; Burruss v. Logging Co., 31 P. (2), 263; Burnett *484 v. Ind. Com., 63 N. E. (2), 240; and Ridgdell v. … School Board, 16 So. (2), 55, cited by plaintiffs, are distinguishable from the facts in the case at bar and may not be held controlling here.
Cited 9 timesPublished250 N.C. 236 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 29, 1959
Cited 0 timesPublishedSilver v. Halifax Cnty. Bd. of Comm'rs
808 S.E.2d 144 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 22, 2017
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrown v. Henderson County Sheriff's Office
District Court, W.D. North Carolina · May 14, 2024
Young v. City of Mount Ranier, 238 F.3d 567, 573 (4th Cir. 2001); see also Fawzy v. … .’”); Colin v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownShuler v. Burnhardt Lumber Co.
180 N.C. 648 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 24, 1920
We are of the opinion that the following cases are clear authority against this position: Wilson v. Brown, 134 N. C., 400 ; Reynolds v. Cathens, 50 N. C., 438 ; Eddleman v. Carpenter, 52 N. C., 617 , Scarboro v. … It was held in Wilson v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedSilver v. Halifax Cnty. Bd. of Comm'rs
809 S.E.2d 285 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 8, 2018
Cited 0 timesPublished148 N.C. 453 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 14, 1908
Brown v. Hamilton, 135 N. C., 10 ; Cox v. Lumber Co., 124 N. C., 78 ; Blue v. Bitter, 118 N. C., 580 ; 30 Am. and Eng. (2d Ed.), 667. … Foil v. Newsome, 138 N. C., 115 ; Glasscock v. Gray, ante; Morgan v. Huggins, 9 L. R. A., 540; Webster’s Dictionary; Bouvier’s Law Dictionary.
Cited 16 timesPublishedSilver v. Halifax Cnty. Bd. of Comm'rs
807 S.E.2d 579 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 14, 2017
Cited 0 timesPublishedSilver v. Halifax Cnty. Bd. of Comm'rs
807 S.E.2d 578 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 14, 2017
Cited 0 timesPublishedSmith v. Board of Trustees of the Teachers' & State Employees' Retirement System
122 N.C. App. 631 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 4, 1996
Our recent decision in Willoughby v. Board of Trustees, No. COA94-1066 (N.C. Ct. App. Feb. 6, 1996) is dispositive of this issue. … benefits on the Social Security account of her deceased husband if: (1) she is sixty years of age or older or (2) she is at least fifty years of age, but less than sixty years of age, and is disabled. 42 U.S.C. § 402 (e); Cook v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedD & W, INC. v. City of Charlotte
268 N.C. 577 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 30, 1966
G.S. 18-61; State v. Anderson and State v. Brown, 265 N.C. 548 , 144 S.E. 2d 581 ; State v. Welch, 232 N.C. 77 , 59 S.E. 2d 199 ; State v. Wilson, 227 N.C. 43 , 40 S.E. 2d 449 ; State v. … G.S. 18-1; State v. Anderson and State v. Brown, supra.
Cited 25 timesPublishedSilver v. Halifax Cnty. Bd. of Comm'rs
806 S.E.2d 675 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 27, 2017
Cited 0 timesPublishedSipfle v. Board of Governors of the University of North Carolina
69 N.C. App. 752 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 7, 1984
In Zimmerman v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCity of New Bern v. New Bern-Craven County Board of Education
335 N.C. 553 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 10, 1994
Cited 0 timesPublished234 N.C. 3 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 7, 1951
. § 20-129(a, e), Thomas v. … v.
Cited 12 timesPublishedSilver v. Halifax Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners
805 S.E.2d 297 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 26, 2017
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna