“Earlier motions made by Defendants were filed prior to and have been rendered moot by Plaintiffs’ filing of the Second Amended Complaint”
How later courts described this case
- “Earlier motions made by Defendants were filed prior to and have been rendered moot by Plaintiffs’ filing of the Second Amended Complaint”
- “Because a properly filed amended complaint supersedes the original one and becomes the operative complaint in the case, it renders the original complaint ‘of no effect.’”
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
ASHEVILLE DIVISION
1:23-cv-00270-MR-WCM
MACKENZIE ELAINE BROWN, )
)
Plaintiff, )
) ORDER
v. )
)
HENDERSON COUNTY )
SHERIFF'S OFFICE; )
ROBERT JORDAN WARREN )
)
; )
MICHAEL SCOTT LINDSAY )
)
; )
CRYSTAL D. LANDERS )
)
; )
JOHNNY E. DUNCAN, JR. )
)
)
; )
BRADLEY R. REESE )
)
; )
BRITTANY NICOLE MAYBIN )
)
)
SUSAN N. OATES )
)
; and )
EMILY GREENE COWAN )
)
)
)
)
Defendants. )
This matter is before the Court on a Motion to Dismiss filed by
Defendants Henderson County Sheriff’s Office, Robert Warren, Michael
Lindsay, Crystal Landers, Johnny Duncan, Jr., Bradley Reese, and Brittany
Maybin (the “HCSO Motion to Dismiss,” Doc. 15) and a Motion to Dismiss filed
by Defendants Susan N. Oates and Emily Greene Cowan (the “Judicial
Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss,” Doc. 17).
By Order filed on May 2, 2024, Plaintiff was granted leave to file an
Amended Complaint. Doc. 36.
Plaintiff filed that pleading on May 13, 2024. Doc. 37.
“The general rule ... is that an amended pleading supersedes the original
pleading, rendering the original pleading of no effect.” Young v. City of Mount
Ranier, 238 F.3d 567, 573 (4th Cir. 2001); see also Fawzy v. Wauquiez Boats
SNC, 873 F.3d 451, 455 (4th Cir. 2017) (“Because a properly filed amended
complaint supersedes the original one and becomes the operative complaint in
the case, it renders the original complaint ‘of no effect.’”); Colin v. Marconi
Commerce Systems Employees’ Retirement Plan, 335 F.Supp.2d 590, 614
(M.D.N.C. 2004) (“Earlier motions made by Defendants were filed prior to and
have been rendered moot by Plaintiffs’ filing of the Second Amended
Complaint”); Ledford v. Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians, No. 1:20-CV-005-
MR-DCK, 2020 WL 1042235 at 1 (W.D.N.C. March 3, 2020) (“It is well settled
that a timely-filed amended pleading supersedes the original pleading, and
that motions directed at superseded pleadings may be denied as moot”).
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the HCSO Motion to Dismiss (Doc.
15) and the Judicial Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 17) are DENIED AS
MOOT AS A MATTER OF LAW. This denial is without prejudice to the filing
of any motions challenging the Amended Complaint, if appropriate.
Signed: May 14, 2024
W. Carleton Metcalf Ay
United States Magistrate Judge ‘elle