Case law

Culinary Workers & Bartenders Union Local 535 v. National Labor Relations Board

310 F.2d 853 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 1, 1962

The sole issue before us is whether substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole supports the Board’s finding. We hold that the finding is thus supported. … The Board’s order will accordingly be affirmed and enforced. So ordered.

Pan American Airways, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

171 F.2d 139 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 1, 1948

The findings and opinion in this' so-called Second Atlantic case do not appear in the printed volumes of the Board’s decisions, but they are available in mimeographed form. Transcontinental & Western Air v. … Docket No. 1706 before the Board; now No. 9674 in this court. Board Docket No. 1499; now No. 9675 in this court. See. 406(a) of the Civil Aeronautics Act, 52 Stat. 998 (1938), 49 U.S.C.A. § 486 (a); Morgan v.

Securities Industry Ass'n v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

627 F. Supp. 695 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 4, 1986

of Governors v. … Becker, Inc. v.

National Black Child Development Institute, Inc. v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

483 A.2d 687 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 8, 1984

Monaco v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, 407 A.2d 1091, 1096 (D.C.1979). … Dexter v. Town Board of Town of Gates, 36 N.Y.2d 102, 104 , 365 N.Y.S.2d 506, 508 , 324 N.E.2d 870, 871 (1975); Vlahos Realty Co. v. Little Boar’s Head District, 146 A.2d 257, 260 (N.H.1958); see also 3 R.M.

A. G. Becker Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

502 F. Supp. 378 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 26, 1980

Ray v. Turner, 587 F.2d 1187 (D.C.Cir.1978); Vaughn v. Rosen, 484 F.2d 820 (1973), cert. denied 415 U.S. 977 , 94 S.Ct. 1564 , 39 L.Ed.2d 873 (1974). … Becker, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, No. 80-2258 (D.C.Cir., filed Oct. 14, 1980); A. G. Becker, Inc. v.

Quincy Park Condominium Unit Owners' Ass'n v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

4 A.3d 1283 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 30, 2010

Homes, Inc. v. … See Nelson v.

Cosgrove v. Thornburgh

703 F. Supp. 995 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 30, 1988

Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 301-03 , 99 S.Ct. 1705, 1717-18 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979). As such, they do not carry the force of law and are not part of the “power and authority” vested in the Board. … In Johnson v.

Townsend v. Mabus

736 F. Supp. 2d 250 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 13, 2010

Townsend; and the entire 256-page Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) hearing transcript. … s Mem. at 23-24); see also Brown v. Gen. Servs.

United Packinghouse, Food & Allied Workers International Union v. National Labor Relations Board

416 F.2d 1126 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 7, 1969

In its historic decision in Brown v. … This circumstance does not gainsay the Supreme Court’s finding in Brown v.

Paralyzed Veterans Of America v. Civil Aeronautics Board

804 F.2d 1306 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 14, 1986

CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Federal Aviation Administration, United States Department of Transportation, Respondents, Regional Airline Association, Intervenor. No. 83-1055. … Before WALD, Chief Judge and MIKVA, Circuit Judge. * PER CURIAM. 1 In Paralyzed Veterans of America v.

Agapito v. District of Columbia

477 F. Supp. 2d 103 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 7, 2007

Brown. Pis.’ Ex. 15 at 2-3. He explained Mr. Brown’s supervisory efforts as follows: [Mr. … Board of Trustees of the Hotel & Restaurant Employees Local 25 v. JPR Inc., 136 F.3d 794, 801 (D.C.Cir.1998).

Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

669 F. Supp. 2d 126 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 19, 2009

Cruz-Packer v. Dist. of Columbia, 539 F.Supp.2d 181, 189 (D.D.C.2008) (quoting Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 255 , 106 S.Ct. 2505 , 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986)); Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. … See 5 U.S.C. § 552 (a)(6)(C); Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Rossotti 326 F.3d 1309, 1310 (D.C.Cir. 2003) (citing Oglesby v. U.S. Dep’t of Army, 920 F.2d 57, 64-65 (D.C.Cir.1990)).

Medco Health Solutions of Las Vegas, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

701 F.3d 710 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 14, 2012

See, e.g., United Steelworkers, AFL- CIO-CLC v. Marshall, 647 F.2d 1189, 1236 (D.C. Cir 1980). Before the Board and on appeal Medco has invoked New River Industries, Inc. v. … We recognize that “the Board draws on a fund of knowledge and expertise all its own,” NLRB v.

Daniel v. Fulwood

823 F. Supp. 2d 13 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2011

Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C. Cir. 2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242. … Warren v. District of Columbia, 353 F.3d 36, 39 (D.C. Cir. 2004); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242. “Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements, do not suffice.”

Teamsters Local Union No. 171 v. National Labor Relations Board

863 F.2d 946 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 9, 1988

See Southwest Regional Joint Bd. v. … See NLRB v.

Thomas v. Power

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 25, 2026

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … Brown v. Gen. Servs. Admin., 425 U.S. 820, 835 (1976); see also Alhayoti v. Blinken, No. 21-cv-7713, 2022 WL 2869850, at *1, 4–5 (N.D. Cal.

Detroit Newspaper Agency v. National Labor Relations Board

171 F. App'x 352 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 7, 2006

Our review “is limited to determining whether the Board’s findings of fact are supported by substantial evidence” in the record as a whole, and if so, “whether the Board acted arbitrarily or otherwise erred in applying established … Stanford Hosp. & Clinics v. NLRB, 370 F.3d 1210, 1212 (D.C.Cir.2004). The Board’s findings are supported by the testimony of multiple witnesses, as well as by other direct evidence.

Cintron v. Jetblue Airways Corp.

324 F. Supp. 3d 248 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 15, 2018

Bower v. EgyptAir Airlines Co. , 731 F.3d 85 , 93 (1st Cir. 2013) (quoting Brown v. United Airlines, Inc. , 720 F.3d 60 , 63 (1st Cir. 2013) ). … The Fourth Circuit has taken a similar middle-ground approach in Smith v. Comair, Inc. , 134 F.3d 254 , 259 (4th Cir. 1998) (holding that "boarding procedures are a service rendered by an airline").

United Transportation Union-General Committee of Adjustment v. Surface Transportation Board

363 F.3d 465 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 6, 2004

The termination of a trackage rights agreement is among the transactions requiririg Board approval, Thompson v. Texas Mexican Ry. … Further, the Board may not create exemptions that relieve rail carriers of their obligations to *31 protect the interests of employees. 49 U.S.C. § 10502 (g); see also McGinness v.

Truck Drivers And Helpers Local Union 728 v. National Labor Relations Board

249 F.2d 512 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 28, 1957

B. v. Denver Bldg. & Const. Trades Council, supra, 341 U.S. at page 692, 71 S.Ct. at page 953. 8 We recognize the doubt, but we must give weight to the resolution of it by the Board. … Carlson v. People of State of California, 310 U.S. 106 , 60 S.Ct. 746 , 84 L.Ed. 1104 ; Thornhill v. State of Alabama, 310 U.S. 88 , 60 S.Ct. 736 , 84 L.Ed. 1093 .