Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersWV

5,304 results

2.54s

  • State v. Surbaugh

    230 W. Va. 212 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Nov 20, 2012

    Surbaugh had been shot, was clearly injured and was in need of medical treatment. … The situation was clearly an emergency.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • PNGI Charles Town Gaming, LLC v. Reynolds

    229 W. Va. 123 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Nov 18, 2011

    Va.C.S.R. where “the context clearly requires a different meaning.” … When a person is excluded from a racetrack or is suspended, he or she is not qualified, whether acting as agent or otherwise, to subscribe for, to enter or run any horse in any race either in his or her own name or in that

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Tankovits v. Glessner

    211 W. Va. 145 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Apr 5, 2002

    We review the final order and the ultimate disposition under an abuse of discretion standard, and we review the circuit court’s underlying factual findings under a clearly erroneous standard. … The BP and Dairy Queen establishments were constructed on the land in 1980, a year before the real estate was first leased to Windmill. .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lester v. United Mine Workers of America Health & Retirement Fund

    40 F. Supp. 2d 800 · District Court, S.D. West Virginia · Feb 17, 1999

    Ignatiadis clearly stated in his 1994 letter that the plaintiffs injuries were related to his 1987 accident. … However, the chronic pain mentioned in the ALJ’s decision clearly is related to the pain from the cervical sprain.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Sutherland v. Miller

    79 W. Va. 796 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Mar 13, 1917

    It reads: “At any time within sixty days after any primary or other election, the attorney general, any prosecuting attorney, any candidate voted for at such election, or any one hundred qualified voters, upon giving bond … They do not inaugurate or *807 establish the public policy of the state. That would be an infringement of article five of the constitution.

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • United States v. Jammal

    90 F. Supp. 3d 618 · District Court, S.D. West Virginia · Feb 9, 2015

    “Once it has been determined that a person does not qualify for citizenship, ... the district court has no discretion to ignore the defect and grant citizenship.” U.S. v. … Because those unlawful acts clearly adversely reflect on Defendant’s moral character, Defendant did not have the good moral character required and therefore illegally procured naturalization.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Peck v. City Council of Montgomery

    150 W. Va. 580 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Jun 14, 1966

    This matter is clearly stated in the third point of the syllabus of the Pridemore case, wherein it is said: “In the absence of the adoption of an ordinance by the governing body of a municipality, or a charter provision to … Clerk of the county court of the county wherein the municipality is located, does not deprive them of the right to vote in a municipal election held in the municipality in which they reside, and in which they are otherwise qualified

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Akers v. West Virginia Department of Highways

    188 W. Va. 698 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Jan 25, 1993

    Appellee qualified as a “communicator,” according to the Department, because he was the “front line man and representative of the Department in Wayne County” and as such was required to respond to the maintenance complaints … The Department clearly failed to meet the following test established in Elrod for the permissible encroachment on a public employee’s First Amendment right: In short, if conditioning the retention of public employment on

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Niland v. Monongahela West Penn Public Service Co.

    125 W. Va. 231 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1942

    We think the testimony clearly preponderates in favor of defendant’s contention that the warning signals were given at the time the Grant sedan approached the crossing. … It is unequivocally established that the work car was not being operated at a fast rate of speed.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Timberline Mountain Operations, LLC, Timberline Property Management, LLC, and Valley Scenic View, LLC v. The County Commission of Tucker County

    District Court, N.D. West Virginia · Mar 17, 2026

    “The [Supreme] Court has . . . rejected any suggestion that a state tax or regulation affecting interstate commerce is immune from Commerce Clause scrutiny because it attaches only to a … The statute, however, provided that institutions “conducted or operated principally for the benefit of persons who are not residents of Maine” qualified only for a more limited tax benefit.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • State v. O'DONNELL

    189 W. Va. 628 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Jul 22, 1993

    Clearly, the letter contains several statements against interest, 9 the combined effect of which is not only to suggest that Mrs. … The evidentiary significance of an admission against interest is that, rather than qualifying as merely impeachment in nature, it is independent substantive evidence. 58 Am.Jur.2d New Trial § 437 (1989).

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • MacLay v. Jones

    208 W. Va. 569 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Dec 1, 2000

    Common Law Privilege .Turning first to the issue of whether a common law privilege exists, Defendants acknowledge that West Virginia is not among the group of states that have chosen to recognize a qualified privilege for … After thoroughly considering the arguments relative to the establishment of a privilege that would protect law enforcement investigatory materials from disclosure, we find no compelling need for the establishment of such

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Patrick J. Meckling v. Marvin Plumley, Warden

    West Virginia Supreme Court · Jun 2, 2017

    We review the final order and the ultimate disposition under an abuse of discretion standard; the underlying factual findings under a clearly erroneous standard; and questions of law are subject to a … Therefore, under the facts and circumstances of this case, we conclude that petitioner’s prior proceeding in Meckling qualifies as an omnibus habeas corpus proceeding under syllabus point two of Losh.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State Road Commission v. Curry

    155 W. Va. 819 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Mar 28, 1972

    It is true that the portions of the bond relating to the conditions thereof are not precisely and exactly worded in the language of the statute, but the bond, when *636 read and considered in its entirety, clearly discloses … minerals, timber and surface *639 is inadmissible in evidence to prove the market value of the property taken, but such different elements contained in, on or under the land or property taken may be considered by competent or qualified

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Reynolds v. Vandervender

    District Court, N.D. West Virginia · Dec 22, 2017

    However, clearly a conclusory allegation does not suffice. … However, the docket in that case, which was opened on September 21, 2019, clearly establishes that a Notice of Deficient Pleading and Intent to Dismiss was entered in that case.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • State Ex Rel. Hechler v. Christian Action Network

    201 W. Va. 71 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Jul 16, 1997

    Code, 22-19-5 [1992], Clearly not included in the above list of information in W. Va. … Code, 29-19-8 [1992] clearly limits the Secretary of State’s review to “[organizations applying for registration[.]”

    Cited 38 timesPublished
  • State of West Virginia v. James B.

    West Virginia Supreme Court · Nov 14, 2016

    The circuit court also determined that respondent established by a preponderance of the evidence that the “acts did, in fact, happen” and the victim’s testimony was also permissible under 404(b) because the testimony showed … on that point will not ordinarily be disturbed unless it clearly appears that its discretion has been abused.”

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ewing v. Lanark Fuel Co.

    65 W. Va. 726 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Jun 11, 1909

    He may not have shown himself very well qualified as an expert to testify on the subject; but the jury was competent to weigh and consider such testimony, and to give to it such value only as it merited, and no doubt did … In other words, the fact that the servant was a minor does not enlarge his rights, whore it is once established that he understood the danger.”

    Cited 62 timesPublished
  • Schwartz v. County Court of Hancock County

    136 W. Va. 626 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Dec 11, 1951

    Article 1 thereof establishes a state board of health, sometimes designated by the chapter as state public health council, makes it a corporation, and defines its powers and duties. … It clearly appears that the defendant paid unto the petitioner, as county health officer for Hancock County, a salary of $4,200.00 for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1950.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Peters v. Narick

    165 W. Va. 622 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Oct 2, 1980

    (Emphasis supplied) It is less than clear what previous cases establish the rule as articulated. One might infer that if previous cases did in fact, establish the rule in this form they would have been cited. … The denial of these rights to properly qualified persons by reason of ... sex, ... is contrary to the principles of freedom and equality of opportunity and is destructive to a free and democratic society.” W.Va.

    Cited 19 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.