Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.08s
B of E City Lawton v. School Dist. No. 49
28 Okla. 321 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 16, 1910
The eontrovers)” involved grew out' of substantially the following facts; November 20, 1905, on a written petition, the board of education of the city of Lawton made-an order attaching certain territory, which constituted … before us; but it is contended on the part of counsel for plaintiff that the averments of their petition were sustained, and’ that the proof offered showed conclusively that the petition and the evidence offered before the board
Cited 0 timesPublishedPendergraft v. Board of Regents of Oklahoma Colleges
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 30, 2020
CIV-18-793-D ) BOARD OF REGENTS OF ) OKLAHOMA COLLEGES, et al., ) … See United States v. Hardage, 116 F.R.D. 460, 462 (W.D. Okla. 1987); Sender v. Mann, 423 F. Supp. 2d 1155, 1163 (D. Colo. 2006).
Cited 0 timesUnknownOklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 24, 1995
Board of Cty. … For example, in Kavanaugh v. Brown, 206 F.
Cited 0 timesPublishedRodriguez v. Wagoner County Board of County Commissioners
District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · Apr 24, 2020
Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007). … See Wessel v. City of Albuquerque, 299 F.3d 1186, 1194 (10th Cir. 2002); Facio v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownRandolph v. Carter County Board of County Commissioners
District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · Apr 10, 2020
CIV-18-319-RAW ) BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ) OF CARTER COUNTY, an Oklahoma ) … Howard v. Segway, Inc., 2012 WL 2923230, at *2 (N.D. Okla. July 18, 2012) citing Washington v. Thurgood Marshall Academy, 230 F.R.D. 18 (D.D.C. 2005); Smith v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownPendleton v. Oklahoma County Board of County Commissioners
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 10, 2020
CIV-18-707-G ) BOARD OF COUNTY ) COMMISSIONERS FOR ) … Co. v. Indeck Power Equip. Co., No. CIV-15-491- D, 2016 WL 5173402, at *2 (W.D. Okla.
Cited 0 timesUnknown496 P.2d 375 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 27, 1972
Brown, 456 F.2d 18 (See Appendix B), on the 16th day of March, 1972, which, in effect, overturned this Court’s decision in Lamb v. State, Okl.Cr., 475 P.2d 829 (See Appendix A), and its progeny. In Lamb v. … Brown.
Cited 16 timesPublishedSchool Dist. No. 6, McClain v. Bd. of Com'rs.
108 Okla. 254 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 5, 1925
The Supreme Court of Illinois, in its opinion in the case of Hecker v. Ry. Co., 83 N. … The same question now presented was passed upon by this count in the case of Board of Education of Nowata v. McCracken, 62 Okla. 173 , 162 Pac. 782 .
Cited 6 timesPublishedMcCullough v. School Dist. No. 37
118 Okla. 59 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 13, 1926
of the board. … The case is styled Brown v. School District, reported in 1 Kan. App. 530 , 40 Pac. 826 . The court was in error in entering judgment against the plaintiffs.
Cited 0 timesPublished103 Okla. 153 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 7, 1924
Battiest v. Wolf, 97 Okla. 215 , 223 Pac. 661 . … In the case of Wilson v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedSAFEWAY STORES, INCORPORATED v. Martin
530 P.2d 131 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 26, 1974
Jones v. Brown, 516 P. 2d 546, 548 (Okl.1973), Hiner v. Hugh Breeding Inc., 355 P.2d 549 (Okl.1960). … The convenience of the Browns in having the action tried in Oklahoma County is reduced to the convenience to Safeway and Herridge and their witnesses outweigh the convenience to the Browns.
Cited 6 timesPublished119 Okla. 296 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 28, 1926
The law makes no presumption of agency, and the burden of proving agency, as well as the nature and extent thereof, rests upon the party alleging it (Bourland v. … Commerce Furniture & Undertaking Co. v. White Sewing Machine Co., 94 Okla. 299 , 222 Pac. 516 .
Cited 2 timesPublished558 P.3d 1220 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 6, 2024
Bird v. Coleman , 1997 OK 44 939 P.2d 1123 Brown v. Okla. State Bank & Trust Co., 1993 OK 117 860 P.2d 230 Stuckey v. Young Exp. Co., 1978 OK 128 586 P.2d 726 ANALYSIS A. … Marshall relies upon the Court of Civil Appeals' ruling in Hass v. Money , 1993 OK CIV APP 38 849 P.2d 1106 Money , while owners were on vacation, they boarded their dog at an animal clinic. Id . ¶ 1, 849 P.2d at 1107 .
Cited 5 timesPublishedKelsey v. Dollarsaver Food Warehouse of Durant
65 O.B.A.J. 3781 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 8, 1994
Co. v. Brown, 45 Okl. 143 , 144 P. 1075, 1080-81 (1914). For a more detailed explanation, see the Partridge quotation infra note 15. … Brown, supra note 13 , 144 P. at 1080-81 ; Manhattan-Dickman Construction Co. v. Shawler, 113 Ariz. 549, 555 , 558 P.2d 894, 900 (1976); Rack, supra, note 13 , 318 S.W.2d at 215 . .
Cited 1 timesPublishedPendleton v. Oklahoma County Board of County Commissioners
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Sep 30, 2019
Brown v. Buhman, 822 F.3d 1151, 1161 n.9 (10th Cir. 2016). … Martinez v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown238 P.3d 954 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 31, 2010
Board of Examiners in Optometry v. Lawton, 1974 OK 69 , 523 P.2d 1064 . … Lester, 1972 OK 126 , 501 P.2d 1099 ; Brown Distributing Co., Inc. v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedThornton v. Holdenville General Hospital
72 O.B.A.J. 3319 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · May 8, 2001
Meistrell v. … See Brown v. Skaggs Albertson's Properties, Inc., 563 F.2d 983, 987-88 (10th Cir.1977).
Cited 14 timesPublishedChilders v. Oklahoma County Board of County Commissioners
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Aug 28, 2019
Childers, is a former employee of defendant, Board of County Commissioners of Oklahoma County. … Quoting MacKenzie v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown122 P.3d 484 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 17, 2005
Brown v. Alliance Real Estate Group, 1999 OK 7 , 976 P.2d 1043, 1045 . Summary judgment is not proper where reasonable minds could draw different inferences or conclusions from the undisputed facts. Id. … Board of Educ. of Lawton Public Schools, 1983 OK 75 , 673 P.2d 154 , and Lamont Ind. Sch. Dist. # I-95 of Gr. Cty. v. Swanson, 1976 OK 38 , 548 P.2d 215 .
Cited 1 timesPublishedBd. of Ed. of Cons. Sch. Dist. v. Bd. of Ed., Cons.
120 Okla. 22 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 19, 1926
Section 10605 imposes upon the county superintendent the duty of furnishing the school board of every district, from which a transfer has been made, with a statement not later than the 15th day of June, showing the amount … Campbell v. Vance, 118 Okla. 283 , 248 Pac. 634 ; Leonard & Braniff v. Price-Few Lbr. Co., 118 Okla. 174 , 247 Pac. 671 ; Oklahoma Producing & Refining Corp. v.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna