Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersNC

10,000+ results

4.37s

  • New Hanover Cnty. Bd. of Educ. v. Stein

    826 S.E.2d 455 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 2, 2019

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • New Hanover Cnty. Bd. of Educ. v. Stein

    823 S.E.2d 393 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 27, 2019

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • District Board of the Metropolitan Sewerage District v. Blue Ridge Plating Co.

    110 N.C. App. 386 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 1, 1993

    The standard for both the superior court, sitting as an appellate court, and this Court, when reviewing the decision of a municipal board was set out by the North Carolina Supreme Court in Concrete Co. v. … Lackey v. Dept. of Human Resources, 306 N.C. 231, 238 , 293 S.E.2d 171, 176 (1982).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Godon v. NC Crime Control & Public Safety

    959 F. Supp. 284 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 4, 1997

    Connick v. Myers, 461 U.S. 138, 142 , 103 S.Ct. 1684, 1687 , 75 L.Ed.2d 708 (1983) (cites omitted); Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563 , 88 S.Ct. 1731 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968). … to Sheriff Brown.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • U.S. Tobacco Coop., Inc. v. Big S. Wholesale of Va., LLC

    365 F. Supp. 3d 604 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Feb 19, 2019

    Brown v. Nationsbank Corp. , 188 F.3d 579 , 587-88 (5th Cir. 1999) (citing *616 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (1) ). … Brown , 188 F.3d at 589 ; see also Boyle v. United Techs.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Bryan v. Hilton Lumber Co.

    154 N.C. 485 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 5, 1911

    Whitson v. Wrenn, 134 N. C., 86 ; Covington v. Furniture Co., 138 N. C., 374 . … Harvell v. Lumber Co., ante, 254. Plaintiff’s negligent conduct fills to the full measure the requirements of proximate cause as expressed by Mr. Justice Hoke in Ramsbottom v. R. R., 138 N.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Cubbage v. Board of Trustees of the Endowment Fund of NC State University

    367 N.C. 778 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 18, 2014

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cubbage v. Board of Trustees of the Endowment Fund of NC State University

    367 N.C. 801 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 18, 2014

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Griffin v. Board of Commissioners of the Law Enforcement Officers' Benefit & Retirement Fund

    84 N.C. App. 443 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 17, 1987

    The letter also stated that the fund’s medical board was of the opinion that his condition could improve to the point of him being able to again perform the duties of a law enforcement officer, and that his status would be … In the meantime, on 24 June 1980, the General Assembly amended G.S. 143-166(y) to require the defendant board to determine whether disability retirees were gainfully employed and to reduce the benefits of those that were

    Overruled in part by Faulkenbury v. Teachers' & State Employees' Retirement System, 345 N.C. 683 (1997)Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Bolling v. . Belk-White Co.

    228 N.C. 749 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 7, 1948

    Taylor v. Wake Forest, supra. There must be some causal connection between the employment and the injury. Canter v. Board of Education, 201 N. C., 836 , 160 S. E., 924 ; Chambers v. Oil Co., 199 N. C., 28 , 153 S. … E., 594 ; Plemmons v. White’s Service, 213 N. C., 148 , 195 S. E., 370 ; Ridout v. Rose’s Stores, Inc., 205 N. C., 423 , 17 S. E. (2d), 642 ; Harden v. Furniture Co., 199 N. C., 733 , 155 S. E., 728 ; Brown v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Farmers & Merchants Bank of Baltimore v. Board of Aldermen of City of Charlotte

    75 N.C. 45 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1876

    Erwins v. Lowrey, 64 N. C. Rep., 321 ; Swepson v. Harvy, 66 N. C. Rep., 436 . … And in Caswell v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State v. Yoes

    271 N.C. 616 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 1, 1967

    Miller, *632 237 N.C. 29 , 74 S.E. 2d 513 ; State v. Brown, 233 N.C. 202 , 63 S.E. 2d 99 . … State v. Lowry and State v. Mallory, supra; State v. Wilson, supra; Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443 , 73 S. Ct. 397 , 97 L. Ed. 469 .

    Cited 64 timesPublished
  • Bardolph v. Arnold

    112 N.C. App. 190 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 5, 1993

    Brown v. Walker, 188 N.C. 52 , 123 S.E. 633 (1924), involved the town of Sylva’s appropriation of $5,000.00 to a trustee for the purchase of rights-of-way for the construction of a railroad, while Moore v. … Horne v. Chafin, 62 N.C.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Butler v. Scot. Cnty. Bd. of Educ.

    813 S.E.2d 853 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 7, 2018

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Governors of the University of North Carolina v. Helpingstine

    714 F. Supp. 167 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jan 9, 1989

    Under Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341 , 63 S.Ct. 307 , 87 L.Ed. 315 (1943), when a state through a sovereign representative acts as sovereign, the state representative is immune from suit under the Sherman Act. … Thus, the University and its Board are sovereign representatives of the State of North Carolina. Further, as protection of the name and symbols of the State is an inherent power of states, Halter v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Hussey v. Montgomery Memorial Hospital, Inc.

    114 N.C. App. 223 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 5, 1994

    This appeal involves an action brought by plaintiffs, husband James Robert Hussey and wife Eva Lee Brown Hussey, against defendant Montgomery Memorial Hospital, Inc., alleging that de *225 fendant’s negligence resulted in … The Court quoted at length from Dawson v. Eli Lilly and Co., 543 F. Supp. 1330, 1338 (D.D.C. 1982): Where the injury is latent, the claim is held not to accrue until the plaintiff discovers the injury.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Anderson

    265 N.C. 548 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 3, 1965

    See State v. Thompson, 257 N.C. 452 , 126 S.E. 2d 58 ; State v. Merritt, 244 N.C. 687 , 94 S.E. 2d 825 ; State v. Albarty, 238 N.C. 130 , 76 S.E. 2d 381 ; State v. Williams, 210 N.C. 159 , 185 S.E. 661 . … State v. Camel, 230 N.C. 426 , 53 S.E. 2d 313 ; State v. Epps, 213 N.C. 709 , 197 S.E. 580 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Perley v. Ballenger Paving Co.

    228 N.C. 479 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 25, 1948

    The facts upon which the decisions were based in Gulf Refining Co. v. Brown, 93 E. (2), 870; Burruss v. Logging Co., 31 P. (2), 263; Burnett *484 v. Ind. Com., 63 N. E. (2), 240; and Ridgdell v. … School Board, 16 So. (2), 55, cited by plaintiffs, are distinguishable from the facts in the case at bar and may not be held controlling here.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Burton v. Matthews

    250 N.C. 236 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 29, 1959

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Henderson County Sheriff's Office

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · May 14, 2024

    Young v. City of Mount Ranier, 238 F.3d 567, 573 (4th Cir. 2001); see also Fawzy v. … .’”); Colin v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.