Case law

Dresser v. Dresser

46 Me. 48 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1858

This last proposition has been ably discussed; and the counsel for the complainants has commented at some length upon the case of Blount v. Barrow, 4 Brown, C. C., 75, and subsequent cases in which it has been cited. … In the case of Dole v.

Mayo v. Hamlin

73 Me. 182 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 20, 1882

Knight v. Mains, 12 Maine, 41; Mann v. Edson, 39 Maine, 25. … Brown v. Williams, 31 Maine, 403. Was the homestead ever redeemed from ■ the levy and the claim under it extinguished?

Keyes v. State

121 Me. 306 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 15, 1922

Treat v. Orono, 26 Maine, 216; Packard v. New Limerick, 34 Maine, 266; Arnold v. Augusta, 118 Maine, 399; Lynde v. Melrose, 10 Allen, 49 . … Treat v.

Coombs v. Warren

17 Me. 404 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 15, 1840

Loker v. Rolle, 3 Vesey, 7 ; Muckleston v. Brown, 6 Vesey, 63 ; Baker v. Mellish, 10 Vesey, 553; Gordon v. Simpkinson, 11 Vesey, 510; Jones v. Jones, 3 Meriv. 502 ; 1 Story’s Eq. 87.

State v. Levesque

281 A.2d 570 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 29, 1971

In State v. … Bosse described the robber as wearing a three-quarter length dark blue jacket with some “fur or something” on it, with no tie, and as having a dark complexion and dark brown hair.

Bernard v. Mead Publishing Paper Division

765 A.2d 576 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 24, 2001

As we noted in Allen v. … The entry is: Decision of the Hearing Officer of the Workers’ Compensation Board vacated. Remanded to the Board for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Benson v. Inhabitants of Newfield

136 Me. 23 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 17, 1938

In applying the principle of presumption to the acts of a county superintendent of schools, the court, in Board of Education of City of Emporia et al. v. … In Clapp v.

Cotton v. Wiscasset, Waterville & Farmington Railroad

98 Me. 511 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 25, 1904

Second, it may be of rails, timber, boards, iron or wire. But how shall it be put together? How many rails, how many timbers, how many "wires ? Upon these details the statute is silent. … The interpretation given to section 36 by the court in Gould v. Bangor & Piscataquis R. R., 82 Maine, 126, sustains this view.

Canal National Bank v. Noyes

348 A.2d 232 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 3, 1975

Fiduciary Trust Co. v. Brown, 152 Me. 360 , 131 A.2d 191 (1957). The most .natural repository of this intent is the trust instrument itself. Bryant v. … Fiduciary Trust Co. v. Brown, 152 Me. 360, 371 , 131 A.2d 191, 197 (1957).

Bumpus v. American Central Insurance

108 Me. 217 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 12, 1911

In this mill the logs were sawed, and the boards and dimension lumber were planed, when necessary. … Martin v. Smith, 102 Maine, 27. Here the defendant can be held only if it is "so nominated in the bond.”

State v. Andrews

624 A.2d 1235 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 19, 1993

Dow v. State, 275 A.2d 815, 820-21 (Me.1971); Morgan v. State, 287 A.2d 592, 598 (Me.1972); State v. Blanchard, 409 A.2d 229 , 232 n. 1 (Me.1979). … See State v.

State v. Patterson

68 Me. 473 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 12, 1878

Hutchison v. Bowker, 5 Mee. & W. 535, 540. Smith v. Faulkner, 12 Gray, 251 , 255. Putnam v. Bond, 100 Mass. 58 . Cunningham v. Washburn, 119 Mass. 224 . Powers v. Cary, 64 Maine, 9, 21. … Primm v. Hazen, 27 Mo. 211 . Heft v. McGill, 3 Pa. St. 257. Reynolds v. Richards, 14 Pa. St. 208. Iasigi v. Brown, 17 How. 183 . Bolckow v. Seymour, 17 C. B. (N. S.) 107. The rule may be subject to other qualification.

Matthews v. Light

32 Me. 305 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1850

Wardell v. Van Rensalaer, 1 Johns. Ch. 344 ; Storrs v. Barker, 6 Johns. Ch. 166 . … Brown v. Veazie, 25 Maine, 359.

Dubie v. Branz

145 Me. 170 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 4, 1950

In McPheters v. … Great Northern Manufacturing Co. v. Brown, 113 Me. 51, 53 , 92 A. 993 . Fraud vitiates all contracts into which it enters, verbal or written. Warren v. Kimball, 59 Me. 264, 266 ; Stewart v.

Loud v. Poland

126 Me. 45 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 4, 1927

Richardson v. Richardson, 80 Maine 585 . Hodgdon v. Clark, 84 Maine 319 . Small v. Thompson, 92 Maine 545 . Haselton v. Shepherd, 99 Maine 495 . A contrary view is expressed in Haines v. … Brown, 114 Maine 320 , in an opinion in which the cases cited above are not discussed and were apparently overlooked. Notwithstanding this later opinion, Richardson v.

Johnson v. S.D. Warren Co.

843 A.2d 1 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 2, 2004

DISCUSSION [¶ 6] In Page v. Gen. Elec. … The entry is: The decision of the hearing officer of the Workers’ Compensation Board is vacated. Remanded to the Workers’ Compensation Board for further proceedings consistent with the opinion herein.

Barker v. French

102 Me. 407 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 15, 1907

See also Drake v. Hamilton Woolen Co., 99 Mass. 574 . In Brooks v. … In Durham v.

Waldo Bros. v. Downing

131 Me. 410 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 6, 1933

Parson v. Monmouth, 70 Me., 262; Ross v. Brown, 74. Me., 352. … In Tuckerman v. *414 Hartwell, 3 Me., 155, and Hobart v. Dodge, 10 Me., 595, our Court adopted the reasoning of Jones v.

Wellby Super Drug Stores, Inc. v. Maine Unemployment Insurance Commission

603 A.2d 476 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 25, 1992

When the Superior Court acting as an appellate court reviews the action of an administrative board, we directly examine the record developed before the board. Gerber Dental Ctr. v. Maine Unemployment Ins. … Thompson v. Maine Unemployment Ins. Comm’n, 490 A.2d 219, 222 (Me. 1985); Moore v. Dep’t of Manpower Affairs, 388 A.2d 516, 519 (Me.1978).

Sawyer v. Hammatt

12 Me. 391 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 15, 1835

Argenbright v. Campbell & wife, 3 Hen. & Mumf. 144. F. Allen, and W. P. Fessenden, for the plaintiffs. Rogers, for the defendants. … And the cases of Stowell v. Pike, 2 Greenl. 387, and Pease & al. v. Gibson, 6 Greenl. 81, have been pressed upon our consideration. Those were actions of trespass. This is trover.