Case law

Cawston v. Sturgis

29 Or. 331 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 3, 1896

E. 355 ); Speed v. Hollingsworth, 54 Kan. 436 ( 38 Pac. 496 ); Lynch v. Mercantile Trust Company, 18 Fed. 486 ; Antle v. Sexton, 137 Ill. 410 ( 27 N. E. 691 ); Jackson v. Armstrong, 50 Mich. 65 ( 14 N. … Law), 138; Flint v. Lewis, 61 Ill. 299 ; Hallam v. Todhunter, 24 Iowa, 166 ; Sears v. Stinson, 3 Wash. 615 ( 29 Pac. 205 ).

State v. Montgomery

106 Or. App. 150 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 27, 1991

ORAP 5.45(2); State v. Brown, 310 Or 347 , 800 P2d 259 (1990); State v. Wills, 93 Or App 322, 323 , 761 P2d 1365 (1988), rev den 307 Or 611 (1989); State v. Braughton, 28 Or App 891, 893 , 561 P2d 1040 (1977). … See State v. Gammond, supra. That error is apparent on the face of the record and needs to be corrected. State v. Brown, supra. The state agrees that, if we reach the issue, the case should be remanded for resentencing.

State v. Stafford

184 Or. App. 674 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 6, 2002

State v. Dixon / Digby, 307 Or 195, 211-12 , 766 P2d 1015 (1988). … State v. Gabbard, 129 Or App 122, 126-27 , 877 P2d 1217 , rev den, 320 Or 131 (1994) (citing State v. Ohling, 70 Or App 249 , 688 P2d 1384 , rev den, 298 Or 334 (1989)).

Thomas v. Harder

District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 8, 2023

See Thomas v. … For Brown and Boemmels, Plaintiff asserts that the facts alleged in Paragraphs 96-112 regarding the alleged deficiencies in the Board’s disciplinary findings are facts that apply to Brown and Boemmels.

Mallatt v. LUIHN

206 Or. 678 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 7, 1956

Parsons, 191 US 17 , 48 L ed 73, 24 S Ct 8 ; Brown v. New Jersey, 175 US 172, 175 , 44 L ed 119, 20 S Ct 77 ; Ex parte Reggel, 114 US 642, 651 , 29 L ed 250, 5 S Ct 1148 ; Missouri v. Lewis, 101 US 22, 31 , 25 L ed 989. … The Hurlbut case was approved and followed in Kelley v. State Board of Social Welfare, 86 Cal App2d 627, 186 P2d 429 .

Harris v. District Court for Southern Indiana

989 F. Supp. 2d 1088 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 14, 2013

Seventh Circuit Brown Exception One potential exception relevant to the pending Petition is recognized by the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals. 2 In Brown v. … United States v. Smith, 544 F.3d 781, 787 (7th Cir.2008). Therefore, the third Brown element -is met.

Taylor v. SAIF

329 Or. App. 135 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 15, 2023

See Dotson v. … See OEA v.

State v. HARBICK

234 Or. App. 699 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 14, 2010

State v. … State v. Brown, 310 Or 347, 355 , 800 P2d 259 (1990). Even if the error is plain, this court must affirmatively exercise its discretion to correct the error. See State ex rel Juv. Dept. v. S.

State v. Walter

36 Or. App. 303 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 18, 1978

Defendant relies on Brown v. Multnomah County Dist. … We recently applied the Brown holding in State v.

State Ex Rel. Nilsen v. Whited

239 Or. 149 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 25, 1964

The party asserting unconstitutionality labors under a heavy burden of proof: Semler v. Oregon State Board of Dental Examiners, supra; Schmidt v. City of Cornelius, 1957, 211 Or 505 , 316 P2d 511 ; Port of Umatilla v. … Richardson, 1906, 48 Or 309 , 85 P 225 , and may be entirely prohibited: Brown and Bennett v. Powers, 1910, 146 Iowa 729 , 125 NW 833 : Twenty-first Amendment.

Davidson v. Oregon Government Ethics Commission

300 Or. 415 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 24, 1985

Ultimate approval of the plan was vested in SAIF’s board of directors. … We last reviewed the question whether nonpenal statutes can be unconstitutional for vagueness in Megdal v. Board of Dental Examiners, 288 Or 293 , 605 P2d 273 (1980).

Johnson v. Timber Structures, Inc.

203 Or. 670 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 30, 1955

Defendant relies on Brown v. Underwood Lumber Co., 172 Or 261 , 141 P2d 527 , and the Inwall and Atkinson cases, supra. All these cases can be distinguished. … In the Brown case, Brown, while scaling logs for the Warner Company, was killed when a log rolled off a truck as it was being loaded by the defendant Underwood Lumber Co.

Peabody v. SAIF

326 Or. App. 132 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 24, 2023

The board adhered to its decision. Claimant petitioned for judicial review, challenging the board’s decision to award $12,500 in attorney fees, rather than the $31,000 claimant had requested. Peabody v. … See Friends of Columbia Gorge v. Energy Fac.

Houston v. Zahm

65 L.R.A. 799 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 18, 1904

Co. v. Continental Ins. Co. 87 N. Y. 400 . … Curtis, 19 Pick. 459 ; Bronson v. Coffin, 108 Mass. 175 ( 11 Am. Rep. 335 ); King v. Wight, 155 Mass. 444 ( 29 N. E. 644 ). 5.

State v. Fox

313 Or. App. 317 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 14, 2021

Although Brown testified that Blue Cross paid for M’s ambu- lance flight, facility charges, and a follow-up appointment, Brown did not provide a breakdown of the cost of each ser- vice. … See State v.

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Smith

292 Or. 84 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 2, 1981

The Trial Board and the Disciplinary Review Board did not agree on the third cause of complaint. … See, e.g., Fredeen v.

State v. Osborne

82 Or. App. 229 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 12, 1986

Brown testified that Saunders asked him to help him commit the murder and burn the house. … United States v. Perez, 658 F2d 654 (9th Cir 1981). Here, Saunders’ statement soliciting Brown’s help contained neither assertions nor recollections of past facts. It also did not misrepresent defendant’s involvement.

Giustina Land & Timber Co., LLC v. Eugene Water & Electric Board

District Court, D. Oregon · Apr 30, 2025

Wood v. … V.

Marcum v. Adventist Health System/West

345 Or. 237 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 16, 2008

Brown[, 297 Or 404 , 687 P2d 751 (1984)] and [State v.] O’Key[, 321 Or 285 , 899 P2d 663 (1995)]. … In Jennings v.

Boothby v. D.R. Johnson Lumber Co.

184 Or. App. 138 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 9, 2002

Id. at 177 (citing Wilson v. P.G.E. Company, 252 Or 385, 390-92, 448 P2d 562 (1968); Brown v. Boise-Cascade Corp., 150 Or App 391, 396 , 946 P2d 324 (1997), rev den, 327 Or 317 (1998)). … Brown, 150 Or App at 395 n 4 (citing Hickey v. Settlemier, 141 Or App 103, 108 , 917 P2d 44 , rev den, 323 Or 690 (1996)); see also Brown v. J. C.