Case law

Darryl Love and Alphonso Bryant v. District of Columbia Office of Employee Appeals and District of Columbia Department of Corrections

90 A.3d 412 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 8, 2014

In Stokes v. … Jail, did not reveal that Leaks had been 26 Brown v. Watts, 993 A.2d 529, 532 (D.C. 2010).  22 convicted for escaping.

North Cleveland Park Citizens Ass'n v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

541 A.2d 912 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 25, 1988

See Jackson v. District of Columbia Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board, 537 A.2d 576 (D.C.1988). … Compare Nelson v.

Rose Lees Hardy Home & School Ass'n v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

324 A.2d 701 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 20, 1974

See Stewart v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 305 A.2d 516, 518 (1973); O’Boyle v. … See Clerics of Saint Viator, Inc. v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 320 A.2d 291 , 296 n. 12 (1974).

Stewart v. Thomas

538 F. Supp. 891 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 6, 1982

Most significantly, the Bundy court made no mention of Brown v. GSA and apparently did not anticipate the relationship between the two cases suggested by the defendant here. Until Barnes v. Costle and Bundy v. … Inapposite cases to which the defendant refers include Brown v.

National Council of American-Soviet Friendship, Inc. v. Subversive Activities Control Board

322 F.2d 375 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 16, 1963

Communist Party of tiie United States v. Subversive Activities Control Board, 367 U.S. 1 , 81 S.Ct. 1357 , 6 L.Ed.2d 625 (1961). 4 . National Council, etc. v. … Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 305 U.S. 197, 229 , 59 S.Ct. 206 , 83 L.Ed. 126 (1938). 22 . Utah Copper Co. v.

Carpenters District Council of Detroit v. National Labor Relations Board

285 F.2d 289 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 8, 1960

In National Labor Relations Board v. … National Labor Relations Board v. Combined Century Theatres, Inc., 2 Cir., 278 F.2d 306 . In National Labor Relations Board v.

Local 1325, Retail Clerks International Ass'n v. National Labor Relations Board

414 F.2d 1194 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 2, 1969

NLRB v. Metropolitan Life Ins. … Co. v. NLRB, supra, 327 F.2d 906 ; NLRB v. Frisch’s Big Boy Ill-Mar, Inc., 356 F.2d 895 (7th Cir. 1966); NLRB v. Davis Cafeteria, supra, 358 F.2d 98 ; NLRB v. Davis Cafeteria, Inc., 396 F.2d 18 (5th Cir. 1968). .

12 Percent Logistics, Inc. v. Unified Carrier Registration Plan Board

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 4, 2019

See Tarrant Regional Water Dist. v. … This reading is supported by Third Circuit’s decision in Doe v. Pennsylvania Board on Probation & Parole.

2200 M STREET LLC v. MacKell

940 A.2d 143 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 31, 2007

Appellees Johnson-Brown and Brown also request injunctive relief to prevent what they allege are appellants’ consumer fraud; the Mackell appellees seek equitable relief in the form of rescission of the purchase of their condominium … Corp. v. Pa.

Southwest Regional Joint Board, Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Levi Strauss & Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

441 F.2d 1027 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 15, 1970

P 11,359 SOUTHWEST REGIONAL JOINT BOARD, AMALGAMATED CLOTHING WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. LEVI STRAUSS & CO., Petitioner, v. … The Board found that maintenance of this rule, operative even during non-working time, constituted a violation of Section 8(a)(1). We sustain the Board. Republic Aviation Corp. v.

Ghaith R. Pharaon v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

135 F.3d 148 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 17, 1998

In-teramericas Invs., Ltd. v. Board of Governors of the Fed. Reserve Sys., 111 F.3d 376, 384 (5th Cir.1997). It is enough, as the Board found, that Pharaon agreed to act as BCCI’s nominee. … Design, Inc. v.

Liquor Salesmen's Union Local 2 v. National Labor Relations Board

664 F.2d 1200 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 31, 1981

It affords the losing party a choice denied the Board when it proceeds under section 10(e).” Ball v. … In UAW v.

Chaplaincy of Full Gospel Churches v. England

454 F.3d 290 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 7, 2006

Glenn Cohen, Attorney.  2 Before: HENDERSON , ROGERS and BROWN , Circuit Judges. Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge BROWN . … Bd., 354 F.3d 249, 261 (4th Cir. 2003); Brown v. Cal. Dep’t of Transp., 321 F.3d 1217, 1226 (9th Cir. 2003); Tenafly Eruv Ass’n v. Borough of Tenafly, 309 F.3d 144, 178 (3d Cir. 2002); Iowa Right to Life Comm., Inc. v.

Green v. McHugh

793 F. Supp. 2d 346 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 24, 2011

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). … The correction board’s decision need only “minimally contain ‘a rational connection between the facts found and the choice made.’ ” Dickson v.

Darnell Hilliard v. Paul A. Volcker, Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board

659 F.2d 1125 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 3, 1981

Coles v. Penny, supra note 23, 174 U.S.App.D.C. at 283 , 531 F.2d at 615 ; see also Bell v. Brown, 181 U.S.App.D.C. 226, 230-231 , 557 F.2d 849, 853-854 (1977). … Compare Coles v. Penny, supra note 23, 174 U.S.App.D.C. at 281 , 531 F.2d at 613 ; Bell v. Brown, supra note 25, 181 U.S. App.D.C. at 231-232, 557 F.2d at 854-855 . Cf. General Elec. Co. v.

Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America v. National Labor Relations Board

417 F.2d 559 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 15, 1969

PRETTYMAN, Senior Circuit Judge: In this case the Labor Board set aside an election on account of unfair labor practices by an- employer and thereupon issued a bargaining order upon the evidence of authorization cards. … Upon the authority of the opinion and decision of the Supreme Court in NLRB v. Gissel Packing Co., Inc., et al., 1 the decision and ruling of the Board are affirmed.

Waterman Steamship Corporation v. Maritime Subsidy Board, Farrell Lines, Incorporated v. James H. Burnley, IV

901 F.2d 1119 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 20, 1990

Finally it noted that “the vast majority” of the Courts of Appeals had reached this conclusion, citing Paulson v. Bowen, 836 F.2d 1249, 1252 (9th Cir.1988); Brown v. … Law Enforcement Assistance Admin., 776 F.2d 1066, 1067 (D.C.Cir.1985); see also Brown v.

Khatri v. Board of Trustees of the University of the District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 5, 2025

Khatri, proceeding pro se, brings this civil action against the defendant, the Board of Trustees of the University of the District of Columbia (the “Board”), asserting a claim of retaliation in violation of Title VII of … Board “did not follow its own procedures and [ ] regulations.”

Highway Truck Drivers & Helpers, Local 107 v. National Labor Relations Board

302 F.2d 897 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 27, 1962

The Board disagreed. … Schauffler v.

Truck Drivers & Helpers Local No. 728 v. National Labor Relations Board

403 F.2d 921 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 18, 1968

No. 21,272 The Supreme Court recently said in NLRB v. … See NLRB v. Mackay Radio & Telegraph Co., 304 U.S. 333 , 58 S.Ct. 904 , 82 L.Ed. 1381 (1938). The trial examiner and the Board, which adopted his findings, found that the Company failed to meet this burden.